- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07392099
Comparison of the Efficacy of an Empowered Relief Single-Session Versus Standard Care for Reducing Postoperative Pain Following Elective Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial (ER-CHUS -Ortho)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to conduct a pragmatic clinical trial comparing the effectiveness and acceptability of two postoperative pain management approaches following elective orthopedic surgery:
- Empowered Relief (ER): A single-session, 2-hour intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) principles, designed to teach patients pain self-management strategies.
- Standard Care: Usual postoperative care without additional psychological intervention.
The investigators aim to determine which approach is more effective and acceptable for patients in managing postoperative pain. Ultimately, this research aims to provide a low-cost, low-risk, widely accessible, and feasible intervention.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1H 5N4
- Recruiting
- CIUSSSE de l'Estrie CHUS
-
Contact:
- Sonia Bédard
- Phone Number: 13927 819-346-1110
- Email: sonia.bedard2@usherbrooke.ca
-
Contact:
- Catherine Raynauld
- Phone Number: 13831 819-346-1110
- Email: catherine.raynauld@usherbrooke.ca
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Frédéric Balg
-
Principal Investigator:
- Magalie Angers
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Bernard Larue
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Margaux Courgeon
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pain >4/10 for >3 months related to the surgical indication
- French fluency
- Ability to adhere to and complete study protocol
- Males and females, 18+
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participated in another project that may cause bias in the study results
- Pain related to cancer
- Cognitive impairment, non-French speaking, or factors that would preclude comprehension of material or full participation in ER
- Previous participation in ER
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Empowered Relief (ER)
Behavioral: Empowered Relief A certified instructor delivers 1 session of pain relief skills intervention (Empowered Relief) to groups of patients who were randomized to this treatment arm.The ER session will be done between 4 to 8 weeks before the surgery.
All treatment sessions will be conducted in person, in a meeting room of the CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS
|
ER is rooted in cognitive behavioral theory and incorporates pain education, self-regulatory skills and mindfulness principle
|
|
No Intervention: Waitlist Control (WLC)
Participants randomized to the waitlist control arm will be instructed to continue with their usual medical care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Intensity and Interference
Time Frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
|
The Brief Pain Inventory-short form measures both the intensity of pain and the interference of pain in various aspects of the patient's life.
Patients rate their pain at its "worst," "least," "average," and "now" (current pain) over the past 24 hours.
Ratings are provided on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "pain as bad as you can imagine."
Patients also assess how pain has interfered with seven aspects of their daily life: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.
|
6-weeks post-surgery
|
|
Pain Intensity and Interference
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
The Brief Pain Inventory-short form measures both the intensity of pain and the interference of pain in various aspects of the patient's life.
Patients rate their pain at its "worst," "least," "average," and "now" (current pain) over the past 24 hours.
Ratings are provided on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "pain as bad as you can imagine."
Patients also assess how pain has interfered with seven aspects of their daily life: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.
|
3-months post-surgery
|
|
Treatment Acceptability
Time Frame: Less than 7 days Post ER session
|
Acceptability of the ER session will be assessed with the Acceptability Home-based questionnaire, a 8-item measure with a total score ranging from 0-48 with higher scores indicative of more acceptability.
|
Less than 7 days Post ER session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item measure with a total score ranging from 0-52 with higher scores indicative of more catastrophizing.
|
6-weeks post-surgery
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item measure with a total score ranging from 0-52 with higher scores indicative of more catastrophizing.
|
3-months post-surgery
|
|
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)
Time Frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
|
The 10 item Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) assesses self-efficacy using à 0 = "Not confident at all" to 6= "Completely confident" scale.
Higher scores suggest a greater self-efficacy.
|
6-weeks post-surgery
|
|
Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
The 10 item Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) assesses self-efficacy using à 0 = "Not confident at all" to 6= "Completely confident" scale.
Higher scores suggest a greater self-efficacy.
|
3-months post-surgery
|
|
General Self-Efficacy - Short Form 4a
Time Frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for self-efficacy using the PROMIS 4-item PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Self-Efficacy - Lower scores indicate lower levels of Self-Efficacy. |
6-weeks post-surgery
|
|
General Self-Efficacy - Short Form 4a
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for self-efficacy using the PROMIS 4-item. PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Self-Efficacy - Lower scores indicate lower levels of Self-Efficacy. |
3-months post-surgery
|
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Depression - 8a
Time Frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for depression using the PROMIS 8-item. PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Depression - Lower scores indicate lower levels of Depression. |
6-weeks post-surgery
|
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Depression - 8a
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for depression using the PROMIS 8-item. PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Depression - Lower scores indicate lower levels of Depression. |
3-months post-surgery
|
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety - 8a
Time Frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for anxiety using the PROMIS 8-item. PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Anxiety- Lower scores indicate lower levels of Anxiety. |
6-weeks post-surgery
|
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety - 8a
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for anxiety using the PROMIS 8-item. PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Anxiety- Lower scores indicate lower levels of Anxiety. |
3-months post-surgery
|
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 4a
Time Frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for sleep disturbance using the PROMIS 4-item. PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Sleep disturbance - Lower scores indicate lower levels of Sleep disturbance. |
6-weeks post-surgery
|
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 4a
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for sleep disturbance using the PROMIS 4-item. PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Sleep disturbance - Lower scores indicate lower levels of Sleep disturbance. |
3-months post-surgery
|
|
PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Social Isolation 4a
Time Frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for social isolation using the PROMIS 4-item. PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Social isolation - Lower scores indicate lower levels of Social isolation. |
6-weeks post-surgery
|
|
PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Social Isolation 4a
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for social isolation using the PROMIS 4-item. PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Social isolation - Lower scores indicate lower levels of Social isolation. |
3-months post-surgery
|
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 4a
Time Frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for fatigue using the PROMIS 4-item. PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Fatigue - Lower scores indicate lower levels of Fatigue. |
6-weeks post-surgery
|
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 4a
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
Compare treatment groups for fatigue using the PROMIS 4-item. PROMIS instruments are normed on the US population and are reported using t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of Fatigue - Lower scores indicate lower levels of Fatigue. |
3-months post-surgery
|
|
Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS)
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
The Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) assesses patients' satisfaction regarding their health care with 7 items using a 4 likert scale from "very satisfied" to "very unsatisfied"
|
3-months post-surgery
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain medication
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Pain medication use will be assessed using a self-report medication questionnaire asking participants which medications they have used to relieve pain in the past 2 weeks. Medication categories include: Acetaminophen, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Muscle relaxants, Opioid/narcotic analgesics, Neuropathic pain medications (e.g., gabapentin, pregabalin), Antidepressants used for pain, Cannabis and Other (specified by participant). For each category, participants indicate frequency of use: As needed (occasionally), Regularly, Used previously but stopped. |
Baseline
|
|
Pain medication
Time Frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
|
Pain medication use will be assessed using a self-report medication questionnaire asking participants which medications they have used to relieve pain in the past 2 weeks. Medication categories include: Acetaminophen, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Muscle relaxants, Opioid/narcotic analgesics, Neuropathic pain medications (e.g., gabapentin, pregabalin), Antidepressants used for pain, Cannabis and Other (specified by participant). For each category, participants indicate frequency of use: As needed (occasionally), Regularly, Used previously but stopped. |
6-weeks post-surgery
|
|
Pain medication
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
Pain medication use will be assessed using a self-report medication questionnaire asking participants which medications they have used to relieve pain in the past 2 weeks. Medication categories include: Acetaminophen, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Muscle relaxants, Opioid/narcotic analgesics, Neuropathic pain medications (e.g., gabapentin, pregabalin), Antidepressants used for pain, Cannabis and Other (specified by participant). For each category, participants indicate frequency of use: As needed (occasionally), Regularly, Used previously but stopped. |
3-months post-surgery
|
|
Pain management method
Time Frame: 6-weeks post-surgery
|
Use of non-pharmacological pain management approaches will be assessed using a self-report questionnaire asking participants which non-medication resources they consulted or used to relieve pain during the past month.
Categories include: Physiotherapy, Occupational therapy, Massage therapy, Psychology services, Self-care strategies (e.g., ice, heat, self-massage), and Other (specified by participant).
Participants will indicate frequency of use for each category: 1-2 times, 3-10 times, More than 10 times.
|
6-weeks post-surgery
|
|
Pain management method
Time Frame: 3-months post-surgery
|
Use of non-pharmacological pain management approaches will be assessed using a self-report questionnaire asking participants which non-medication resources they consulted or used to relieve pain during the past month.
Categories include: Physiotherapy, Occupational therapy, Massage therapy, Psychology services, Self-care strategies (e.g., ice, heat, self-massage), and Other (specified by participant).
Participants will indicate frequency of use for each category: 1-2 times, 3-10 times, More than 10 times.
|
3-months post-surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CÉRCIUSSSEstrieCHUS_2025-5666
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain
-
University Rovira i VirgiliMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación, SpainNot yet recruitingChronic Post-operative Pain | Chronic Postsurgical Pain | Chronic Post-surgical Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainSpain
-
Pain ConcernThe Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE) and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Chronic Pain, Widespread | Chronic Pain Due to Trauma | Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding) | Chronic Pain Due to Injury | Chronic Pain Post-Procedural | Chronic Pain HipUnited Kingdom
-
Bjorn AngKarolinska Institutet; The Swedish Research Council; Göteborg University; Forte; Dalarna...Not yet recruitingPain Management | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain, WidespreadSweden
-
University of FaisalabadNot yet recruiting
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCAPES Foundation - Ministry of Education, Brazil.Enrolling by invitationChronic Low Back Pain | Chronic Shoulder Pain | Chronic Knee PainBrazil
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionCompletedPain, Chronic | Widespread Chronic PainSweden
-
Washington D.C. Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Back Pain | Chronic Pain (back / Neck)United States
-
Connecticut Children's Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Pain | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...RecruitingJoint Pain | Chronic Knee Pain | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck) | Chronic Pain ManagementUnited States
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States