Endoscopic Suture Gastroplasty (ESG) for Treatment of Obese Patients With Endometrial Cancer (ESG-ENDO)

February 10, 2026 updated by: Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - Aviano

Endoscopic Suture Gastroplasty (ESG) for Treatment of Obese Patients With Endometrial Cancer: a Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study (ESG-ENDO)

Obesity increases the risk of endometrial cancer, with higher Body Mass Index (BMI) leading to a significant increase in both cancer risk and recurrence. Because of the excellent cancer-specific outcomes and preponderance of obesity-related complications, women with endometrial cancer are more likely to die of cardiovascular disease and other obesity-related illnesses than endometrial cancer itself. This makes an endometrial cancer diagnosis a critical moment to emphasizes the importance of actively managing the underlying issue of obesity in the endometrial cancer survivorship period.

Bariatric surgery has shown long-term benefits, including weight loss and reduction of obesity-related comorbidities, and has been linked to a decrease in endometrial cancer incidence. However, bariatric surgery has limitations, such as irreversibility and potential complications. Recent interest in less invasive methods, like bariatric endoscopy, shows promising results in achieving weight loss and improving metabolic profiles. Endoscopic procedures, such as Endomina Endoscopic suture gastroplasty (E-ESG), have shown effectiveness in weight loss and could offer a safer, more accessible alternative to surgery, in particular if associated to a lifestyle modifications program. Efficacy and safety of Bariatric endoscopy has been stressed within the recently published "Guideline of the Italian Society of Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases on Bariatric Endoscopy in the treatment of obesity and associated complications" that suggest the use of bariatric endoscopy in patients with class I obesity and in patients with class II obesity regardless of the presence of comorbidities, for the treatment of obesity.

This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of the E-ESG procedure in treating obesity in women after curative treatment for endometrial cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Obesity increases the risk of endometrial cancer, with higher BMI leading to a significant increase in both cancer risk and recurrence. Because of the excellent cancer-specific outcomes and preponderance of obesity-related complications, women with endometrial cancer are more likely to die of cardiovascular disease and other obesity-related illnesses than endometrial cancer itself. This makes an endometrial cancer diagnosis a critical moment to emphasizes the importance of actively managing the underlying issue of obesity in the endometrial cancer survivorship period. Bariatric surgery has shown long-term benefits, including weight loss and reduction of obesity-related comorbidities, and has been linked to a decrease in endometrial cancer incidence. However, bariatric surgery has limitations, such as irreversibility and potential complications. Recent interest in less invasive methods, like bariatric endoscopy, shows promising results in achieving weight loss and improving metabolic profiles. Endoscopic procedures, such as Endomina Endoscopic suture gastroplasty (E-ESG), have shown effectiveness in weight loss and could offer a safer, more accessible alternative to surgery, in particular if associated to a lifestyle modifications program. Efficacy and safety of Bariatric endoscopy has been stressed within the recently published "Guideline of the Italian Society of Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Diseases on Bariatric Endoscopy in the treatment of obesity and associated complications" that suggest the use of bariatric endoscopy in patients with class I obesity and in patients with class II obesity regardless of the presence of comorbidities, for the treatment of obesity.

This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of the E-ESG procedure in treating obesity in women after curative treatment for endometrial cancer.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

74

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Pordenone
      • Aviano, Pordenone, Italy, 33081
        • Recruiting
        • Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO) - IRCCS Aviano
        • Contact:
    • Roma
      • Roma, Roma, Italy
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
        • Contact:
          • Francesco Maria Di Matteo
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Margareth Martino

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women with endometrial cancer scheduled for hysterectomy with a curative intent, with BMI ≥ 30 and Willingness to undergo E-ESG and lifestyle modifications program

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with endometrial cancer scheduled for hysterectomy with a curative intent
  • Age 21-75
  • BMI ≥ 30
  • Willingness to undergo E-ESG and lifestyle modifications program
  • Willingness to comply with the substantial lifelong dietary restrictions required by the procedure
  • Willingness to follow protocol requirements, including signed informed consent, routine follow-up schedule, completing laboratory tests, and completing diet counseling
  • Residing within a reasonable distance from the investigator's office and able to travel to the investigator to complete all routine follow- up visits
  • Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of foregut or gastrointestinal (GI) surgery (except uncomplicated cholecystectomy or appendectomy)
  • Prior gastrointestinal surgery with sequelae, i.e., obstruction, and/or adhesive peritonitis or known abdominal adhesions
  • Prior open or laparoscopic bariatric surgery
  • Prior surgery of any kind on the esophagus, stomach, or any type of hiatal hernia surgery
  • Any inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract including severe (LA Grade C or D) esophagitis, gastric ulceration, duodenal ulceration, cancer or specific inflammation such as Crohn's disease
  • Potential upper gastrointestinal bleeding conditions such as esophageal or gastric varices, congenital or acquired intestinal telangiectasis, or other congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract such as atresia or stenoses
  • Gastrointestinal stromal tumors, history of premalignant gastric lesions (advanced atrophic gastritis), history of familial and non-familial adenomatous syndromes
  • A gastric mass or gastric polyps > 1 cm in size
  • A hiatal hernia > 4 cm of axial displacement of the z-line above the diaphragm or severe or intractable gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms
  • A structural abnormality in the esophagus or pharynx such as a stricture or diverticulum that could impede passage of the endoscope
  • Achalasia or any other severe esophageal motility disorder
  • Severe coagulopathy
  • Subjects with any serious health condition unrelated to their weight that would increase the risk of endoscopy
  • Motility disorders of the GI tract such as gross esophageal motility disorders, gastroparesis, or intractable constipation
  • Hepatic insufficiency or cirrhosis
  • Use of an intragastric device prior to this study due to the increased thickness of the stomach wall preventing effective suturing
  • Active psychological issues preventing participation in a life-style modification program as determined by a psychologist
  • Patients unwilling to participate in an established medically supervised diet and behavior modification program, with routine medical follow-up
  • Patients who are unable or unwilling to take prescribed proton pump inhibitor medication
  • Patients receiving daily prescribed treatment with high dose aspirin (> 80 mg daily), anti-inflammatory agents, anticoagulants, or other gastric irritants
  • Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Subjects with Severe cardiopulmonary disease or other serious organic disease which might include known history of coronary artery disease, Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, poorly controlled hypertension, required use of NSAIDs
  • Subjects taking medications on specified hourly intervals that may be affected by changes to gastric emptying, such as anti-seizure or anti-arrhythmic medications
  • Subjects who are taking corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and narcotics
  • Subjects who are taking diet pills
  • Symptomatic congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, or unstable coronary artery disease
  • Pre-existing respiratory disease such as moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring steroids, pneumonia, or cancer
  • Diagnosis of autoimmune connective tissue disorder (e.g., lupus, erythematosus, scleroderma) or immunocompromised
  • Specific diagnosed genetic disorder such as Prader Willi syndrome
  • Eating disorders including night eating syndrome (NES), bulimia, binge eating disorder, or compulsive overeating
  • Known history of endocrine disorders affecting weight such as uncontrolled hypothyroidism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the feasibility of E-ESG procedure in obese patients with endometrial cancer.
Time Frame: up to 4 years
Absolute and relative frequency of patients with technical success of E-ESG procedure, reported with relative 95% Confidence Interval
up to 4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of patients who refused E-ESG procedure
Time Frame: up to 4 years
Evaluation of the number and percentage of women with endometrial cancer and obese who refused E-ESG procedure
up to 4 years
Evaluation of patients who refused E-ESG procedure
Time Frame: up to 4 years
Description with absolute and relative frequencies of baseline characteristics of women with endometrial cancer and obese who refused E-ESG procedure
up to 4 years
Evaluation of E-ESG safety in obese endometrial cancer patients.
Time Frame: up to 4 years
Absolute and relative frequencies of adverse events
up to 4 years
To evaluate efficacy of E-ESG effects on obesity-associated comorbidities.
Time Frame: up to 4 years
Evaluation of % Excess weight loss (EWL) with the formula (Weight loss)/ (Excess weight at T0) x 100 and %TBWL(total body weight loss) with the formula (weight loss) / (weight at T0) x 100 in enrolled patients at 1 year
up to 4 years
Evaluation of percentage of patients that reach a mean excess weight loss (EWL) of more than 25% and total body weight loss (TBWL) of more than 5% maintained at 1 year (52 weeks) in E-ESG and lifestyle modifications group
Time Frame: up to 4 years
Absolute and relative frequencies of patients that reach a mean excess weight loss (EWL) of more than 25% and a total body weight loss (TBWL) of more than 5% maintained at 1 year (52 weeks)
up to 4 years
To evaluate the change of metabolic serum biomarkers in E-ESG patients
Time Frame: up to 4 years
Mean or median difference between baseline values of metabolic serum biomarkers and 52 weeks (T1), and 156 weeks (T2)
up to 4 years
To evaluate the change of gut microbiota
Time Frame: up to 4 years
Microbial levels will be described as mean or median, reporting differences in levels ad different time points
up to 4 years
To evaluate Overall Survival in E-ESG
Time Frame: up to 4 years
Overall survival will be defined as time between E-ESG and death from any cause or end of follow up, whichever cames first. Data will be described as median survival and interquartile range (IQR) calculated with Kaplan-Meyer method
up to 4 years
To evaluate Disease Free Survival n E-ESG
Time Frame: up to 4 years
Overall survival will be defined as time between E-ESG and disease progression or death from any cause or end of follow up, whichever cames first. Data will be described as median survival and interquartile range (IQR) calculated with Kaplan-Meyer method
up to 4 years
To evaluate Recurrence rate in E-ESG
Time Frame: up to 4 years
Disease recurrence rate at the end of follow up will be reported as absolute and relative frequency
up to 4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrial Cancer

Subscribe