- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07398001
Discontinuation of Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the benefits and risks of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy on clinical outcomes in patients who previously underwent coronary intervention using a drug-coated balloon.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does stopping antiplatelet therapy after 12 months affect the risk of net adverse clinical events? Does stopping antiplatelet therapy reduce the risk of bleeding compared with continuing treatment?
Researchers will compare patients who discontinue antiplatelet therapy with patients who continue antiplatelet therapy to determine the impact on clinical outcomes during follow-up.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to either discontinue or continue antiplatelet therapy Receive routine clinical follow-up through clinic visits or telephone contacts Be monitored for cardiovascular events and bleeding outcomes over time
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Percutaneous coronary intervention is widely used for the treatment of coronary artery disease, traditionally involving implantation of drug-eluting stents. Although contemporary drug-eluting stents have improved safety and efficacy compared with earlier stent technologies, permanent metallic implants remain associated with long-term considerations, including restenosis, stent thrombosis, and the need for prolonged antiplatelet therapy.
Drug-coated balloon therapy represents an alternative revascularization strategy that delivers an antiproliferative drug to the coronary vessel wall without implantation of a permanent scaffold. This "leave-nothing-behind" approach has been adopted in specific clinical settings and has been increasingly applied in selected coronary lesions. The absence of a permanent implant may offer potential advantages with respect to long-term vessel healing and antiplatelet therapy management.
Bleeding complications after coronary intervention are clinically relevant and have been associated with adverse outcomes. Decisions regarding the duration of antiplatelet therapy require careful consideration of both ischemic and bleeding risks. While shorter durations of antiplatelet therapy have been explored following contemporary coronary interventions, optimal long-term antiplatelet strategies after drug-coated balloon-based procedures remain incompletely defined.
Limited data are available regarding the clinical outcomes associated with discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy beyond 12 months in patients who have undergone initial percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon treatment and have remained clinically stable. As a result, uncertainty persists regarding the balance of potential benefits and risks of long-term antiplatelet therapy in this population.
This prospective, randomized, multicenter study is designed to compare clinical outcomes between patients who discontinue antiplatelet therapy and those who continue antiplatelet therapy after 12 months following drug-coated balloon-based percutaneous coronary intervention. The study aims to provide additional evidence to inform clinical decision-making regarding antiplatelet therapy management in patients treated with drug-coated balloons.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Eun-Seok Shin, MD
- Phone Number: +82-10-6319-4025
- Email: sesim1989@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ansan, South Korea
- Korea University Ansan Hospital
-
Contact:
- Sunwon Kim, MD
- Email: sunwon11@hanmail.net
-
Chuncheon, South Korea
- Kangwon National University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Ae-Young Her, MD
- Phone Number: +82-10-6375-3863
- Email: hermartha@hanmail.net
-
Pusan, South Korea
- Kosin University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Soo-Jin Kim, MD
- Email: circleabc@naver.com
-
Seoul, South Korea
- Korea University Guro Hospital
-
Contact:
- Dong Oh Kang, MD
- Email: gelly9@naver.com
-
Seoul, South Korea
- Samsung Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Joo Myung Lee, MD
- Email: drone80@hanmail.net
-
Ulsan, South Korea
- Ulsan University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Eun-Seok Shin, MD
- Phone Number: +82-10-6319-4025
- Email: sesim1989@gmail.com
-
Ulsan, South Korea
- Ulsan Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Chang-Bae Sohn, MD
- Email: scb77@daum.net
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 19 years or older who are able to understand the risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives of the study and who provide written informed consent voluntarily.
- Patients who underwent drug-coated balloon treatment at least 12 months prior to enrollment.
- Patients who have not experienced major adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, or target vessel revascularization, since the index DCB treatment.
- Patients who have not experienced major bleeding since the index DCB treatment.
- Patients who are receiving antiplatelet therapy at the time of enrollment.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with concomitant vascular disease requiring long-term antiplatelet therapy.
- Patients with non-cardiac comorbid conditions that, in the judgment of the investigator, are associated with a life expectancy of less than 1 year or may result in poor compliance with the study protocol.
- Patients who are participating in another drug or coronary device clinical study at the time of enrollment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Stop Antiplatelet
Antiplatelet discontinuation group
|
Antiplatelet discontinuation after DCB treatment
|
|
Active Comparator: Continue Antiplatelet
Antiplatelet continuation group
|
Antiplatelet continuation after DCB treatment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Net adverse clinical events (NACE)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after randomization
|
A composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, and bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5. Non-fatal myocardial infarction is defined as a myocardial infarction diagnosed using standard clinical, electrocardiographic, and biomarker criteria that does not result in death. |
Up to 12 months after randomization
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
NACE
Time Frame: Up to 24, 36 months after randomization
|
A composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, and bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5.
|
Up to 24, 36 months after randomization
|
|
The single components of the primary endpoint
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
A composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, and bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5.
|
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
|
Rate of cardiac death
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
Cardiac death is defined as death resulting from an immediate cardiac cause, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, fatal arrhythmia, or sudden cardiac death.
Deaths of unknown cause or unwitnessed deaths without an identifiable non-cardiac cause are also classified as cardiac death.
Deaths clearly attributable to non-cardiac causes, such as malignancy, infection, trauma, or other non-cardiovascular conditions, are not considered cardiac death.
|
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
|
Stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic)
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
Stroke is defined as a new, sudden onset of a focal or global neurological deficit lasting 24 hours or longer, or resulting in death, with a vascular cause.
Both ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke are included.
The diagnosis is confirmed by clinical assessment and supported by brain imaging when available.
Transient ischemic attacks (TIA), defined as neurological symptoms resolving within 24 hours without evidence of infarction or hemorrhage, are not considered stroke.
|
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
|
Target lesion failure
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
A composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization.
|
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
|
Angina severity measured with Seattle Angina Questionnaires
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months after randomization
|
Angina severity is assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), a validated, patient-reported questionnaire designed to measure the impact of angina on daily life.
The questionnaire evaluates angina-related symptoms, physical limitation, and quality of life.
Higher scores indicate fewer angina symptoms and better functional status.
Changes in SAQ scores over time are used to assess angina severity during follow-up.
|
At baseline and 12 months after randomization
|
|
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
Cost-effectiveness is defined as an economic evaluation comparing the costs and clinical outcomes of the study treatment strategies.
Direct medical costs related to treatment, follow-up care, hospitalizations, and management of clinical events are assessed and compared in relation to clinical outcomes during the follow-up period.
Cost-effectiveness is evaluated to determine the relative economic value of discontinuing versus continuing antiplatelet therapy.
|
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
|
Sex difference in NACE
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
Sex differences are assessed by comparing the incidence of NACE between male and female participants during follow-up.
|
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
|
Comparison of NACE in DM patients
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
NACE in patients with diabetes mellitus is assessed as a composite of ischemic and bleeding events during follow-up after randomization.
|
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
|
NACE in patients with acute coronary syndrome
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
Acute coronary syndrome was defined as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or unstable angina.
|
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025-04-042
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
-
Ospedale della MisericordiaUnknownTo Achieve an Early Reendothelialization at the Expense of Low Restenosis: The EREMUS Study (EREMUS)Percutaneous Coronary Intervention | Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous CoronaryItaly
-
Ospedale Sandro Pertini, RomaCompletedPercutaneous Coronary Intervention | Coronary AngiographyItaly
-
Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Biomedical Robot...Not yet recruitingPercutaneous Coronary InterventionChina
-
Shenyang Northern HospitalCompletedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionChina
-
Beijing Anzhen HospitalPeking UniversityUnknownPercutaneous Coronary Intervention
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownPercutaneous Coronary Intervention
-
ZhangWenduoUnknownPercutaneous Coronary InterventionChina
-
Riphah International UniversityNot yet recruitingPercutaneous Coronary Intervention
-
Asan Medical CenterLN RoboticsCompletedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionKorea, Republic of
-
Portola PharmaceuticalsCompletedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionUnited States, Austria, Canada, Germany, Poland
Clinical Trials on Stop Antiplatelet
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingDifficult Intubation | Airway DiseaseTurkey
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Cancer Institute (NCI); American Medical Group AssociationRecruiting
-
Aalborg University HospitalCompletedGraves Disease | Hyperthyroidism
-
Central Jutland Regional HospitalCompletedMedical PatientsDenmark
-
Medtronic Spine LLCWithdrawnLumbar Spinal Stenosis
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompletedPregnant Women With Type 1 DiabetesBelgium
-
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRecruiting
-
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernSwiss National Science Foundation; University of Bern; Fachhochschule NordwestschweizRecruitingCommunication Research | Communication, MultidisciplinarySwitzerland, Austria
-
Stanford UniversityUniversity of MichiganUnknownCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicUnited States
-
Gan LijunRecruiting