Discontinuation of Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment

February 2, 2026 updated by: Eun-Seok Shin, Ulsan University Hospital

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the benefits and risks of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy on clinical outcomes in patients who previously underwent coronary intervention using a drug-coated balloon.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does stopping antiplatelet therapy after 12 months affect the risk of net adverse clinical events? Does stopping antiplatelet therapy reduce the risk of bleeding compared with continuing treatment?

Researchers will compare patients who discontinue antiplatelet therapy with patients who continue antiplatelet therapy to determine the impact on clinical outcomes during follow-up.

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned to either discontinue or continue antiplatelet therapy Receive routine clinical follow-up through clinic visits or telephone contacts Be monitored for cardiovascular events and bleeding outcomes over time

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Percutaneous coronary intervention is widely used for the treatment of coronary artery disease, traditionally involving implantation of drug-eluting stents. Although contemporary drug-eluting stents have improved safety and efficacy compared with earlier stent technologies, permanent metallic implants remain associated with long-term considerations, including restenosis, stent thrombosis, and the need for prolonged antiplatelet therapy.

Drug-coated balloon therapy represents an alternative revascularization strategy that delivers an antiproliferative drug to the coronary vessel wall without implantation of a permanent scaffold. This "leave-nothing-behind" approach has been adopted in specific clinical settings and has been increasingly applied in selected coronary lesions. The absence of a permanent implant may offer potential advantages with respect to long-term vessel healing and antiplatelet therapy management.

Bleeding complications after coronary intervention are clinically relevant and have been associated with adverse outcomes. Decisions regarding the duration of antiplatelet therapy require careful consideration of both ischemic and bleeding risks. While shorter durations of antiplatelet therapy have been explored following contemporary coronary interventions, optimal long-term antiplatelet strategies after drug-coated balloon-based procedures remain incompletely defined.

Limited data are available regarding the clinical outcomes associated with discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy beyond 12 months in patients who have undergone initial percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon treatment and have remained clinically stable. As a result, uncertainty persists regarding the balance of potential benefits and risks of long-term antiplatelet therapy in this population.

This prospective, randomized, multicenter study is designed to compare clinical outcomes between patients who discontinue antiplatelet therapy and those who continue antiplatelet therapy after 12 months following drug-coated balloon-based percutaneous coronary intervention. The study aims to provide additional evidence to inform clinical decision-making regarding antiplatelet therapy management in patients treated with drug-coated balloons.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1042

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Ansan, South Korea
      • Chuncheon, South Korea
        • Kangwon National University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Pusan, South Korea
      • Seoul, South Korea
        • Korea University Guro Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Seoul, South Korea
      • Ulsan, South Korea
        • Ulsan University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Ulsan, South Korea
        • Ulsan Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults aged 19 years or older who are able to understand the risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives of the study and who provide written informed consent voluntarily.
  2. Patients who underwent drug-coated balloon treatment at least 12 months prior to enrollment.
  3. Patients who have not experienced major adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, or target vessel revascularization, since the index DCB treatment.
  4. Patients who have not experienced major bleeding since the index DCB treatment.
  5. Patients who are receiving antiplatelet therapy at the time of enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with concomitant vascular disease requiring long-term antiplatelet therapy.
  2. Patients with non-cardiac comorbid conditions that, in the judgment of the investigator, are associated with a life expectancy of less than 1 year or may result in poor compliance with the study protocol.
  3. Patients who are participating in another drug or coronary device clinical study at the time of enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stop Antiplatelet
Antiplatelet discontinuation group
Antiplatelet discontinuation after DCB treatment
Active Comparator: Continue Antiplatelet
Antiplatelet continuation group
Antiplatelet continuation after DCB treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Net adverse clinical events (NACE)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after randomization

A composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, and bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5.

Non-fatal myocardial infarction is defined as a myocardial infarction diagnosed using standard clinical, electrocardiographic, and biomarker criteria that does not result in death.

Up to 12 months after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NACE
Time Frame: Up to 24, 36 months after randomization
A composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, and bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5.
Up to 24, 36 months after randomization
The single components of the primary endpoint
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
A composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, clinically driven target vessel revascularization, and bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5.
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
Rate of cardiac death
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
Cardiac death is defined as death resulting from an immediate cardiac cause, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, fatal arrhythmia, or sudden cardiac death. Deaths of unknown cause or unwitnessed deaths without an identifiable non-cardiac cause are also classified as cardiac death. Deaths clearly attributable to non-cardiac causes, such as malignancy, infection, trauma, or other non-cardiovascular conditions, are not considered cardiac death.
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
Stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic)
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
Stroke is defined as a new, sudden onset of a focal or global neurological deficit lasting 24 hours or longer, or resulting in death, with a vascular cause. Both ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke are included. The diagnosis is confirmed by clinical assessment and supported by brain imaging when available. Transient ischemic attacks (TIA), defined as neurological symptoms resolving within 24 hours without evidence of infarction or hemorrhage, are not considered stroke.
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
Target lesion failure
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
A composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization.
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
Angina severity measured with Seattle Angina Questionnaires
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months after randomization
Angina severity is assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), a validated, patient-reported questionnaire designed to measure the impact of angina on daily life. The questionnaire evaluates angina-related symptoms, physical limitation, and quality of life. Higher scores indicate fewer angina symptoms and better functional status. Changes in SAQ scores over time are used to assess angina severity during follow-up.
At baseline and 12 months after randomization
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
Cost-effectiveness is defined as an economic evaluation comparing the costs and clinical outcomes of the study treatment strategies. Direct medical costs related to treatment, follow-up care, hospitalizations, and management of clinical events are assessed and compared in relation to clinical outcomes during the follow-up period. Cost-effectiveness is evaluated to determine the relative economic value of discontinuing versus continuing antiplatelet therapy.
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
Sex difference in NACE
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
Sex differences are assessed by comparing the incidence of NACE between male and female participants during follow-up.
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
Comparison of NACE in DM patients
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
NACE in patients with diabetes mellitus is assessed as a composite of ischemic and bleeding events during follow-up after randomization.
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
NACE in patients with acute coronary syndrome
Time Frame: Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization
Acute coronary syndrome was defined as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or unstable angina.
Up to 12, 24, 36 months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 12, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 11, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Only de-identified individual participant data necessary to reproduce the main analyses will be shared. Data sharing will be subject to approval of a research proposal and execution of a data use agreement.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and ending 5 years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound research proposal may request access to the de-identified individual participant data. Requests will be reviewed by the study steering committee, and access will be granted following approval of the proposal and execution of a data use agreement.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Clinical Trials on Stop Antiplatelet

Subscribe