The STOP-HPV Scale Up Study

May 18, 2026 updated by: Peter G Szilagyi, MD MPH, University of California, Los Angeles

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes 35,900 US cancer cases per year, 4,000 deaths, and $4 billion in can In this study, the investigators will conduct a 3-arm clustered randomized controlled trial (RCT) in an estimated 72 practices from up to 8 health systems to evaluate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of two potentially scalable implementation strategies (based on prior work) to increase the initiation of HPV vaccine against a usual care (control) arm. The intervention arms are 1) online provider communication training only ("STOP-HPV-Online" and 2) online provider communication training plus a Learning Collaborative, with performance feedback, attended by practice leads ("STOP-HPV-LC).

cer-related costs. It is recommended at ages 11-12 years routinely but can be given starting at ages 9-10 years. Despite having an effective vaccine, HPV vaccine initiation/completion rates in the U.S. were only at 76.8%/61.4% respectively in 2023 among 13-17 year olds; these rates are lower than the other recommended adolescent vaccines. Two key barriers are 1) suboptimal clinician communication to address parental concerns and 2) ineffective office systems causing missed vaccine opportunities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In prior work, the investigators have tested two implementation strategies/interventions that were effective, but which were deployed by the research team. The first is provider communication training ("STOP-HPV-Online"), delivered by the research team, in a cluster RCT in 48 pediatric practices from a research network (6.8% improvement in initiation). The other is a quality improvement, pre-post study, that included both provider communication training, as well as a Learning Collaborative (LC) for practice leads (8% increase in initiation).

A major challenge in implementation science and spreading practice-based strategies is to move from research teams deploying implementation strategies (intervention) to health systems deploying them. In this study, the investigators will compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the two implementation strategies (interventions) using a 3-arm clustered RCT: 1) STOP-HPV-Online vs 2) STOP-HPV-LC vs 3) usual care. The study team will randomize an estimated 72 practices (from up to 8 health systems) to the 1) STOP-HPV-Online arm, 2) the STOP-HPV-LC arm or 3) the control arm, assess fidelity to the intervention and conduct the evaluation. A collaborating organization, AMGA (the American Medical Group Association), will facilitate training of the health system personnel, as needed; however, the health systems will deploy each intervention. The primary outcome measure is the initiation rate among 9-<13 year olds with a well-child care visit during the 12 month intervention period (with inclusion starting at the time of a well child care visit during the intervention period). A secondary outcome measure will be the initiation rate among 13-17 year olds with a well child care visit during the intervention period (with inclusion starting at the time of a well child care visit during the intervention period. For both measures, inclusion criteria will be: 1) presenting to a participating practice, 2) age eligible at the visit and 3) no prior vaccine at the time of the visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Alexandria, Virginia, United States, 22314
        • Recruiting
        • AMGA
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient of participating practice
  • Well child care visit during the 12-month intervention period
  • No prior dose of HPV vaccine at the time of the well child care visit
  • Age-eligible

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior dose of HPV vaccine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: STOP-HPV Online
Provider communication training
Approximately one third of practices within a participating health system will be randomized to receiving the STOP-HPV-Online intervention.
Experimental: STOP-HPV LC
Provider communication training plus Learning Collaborative sessions attended by practice leads and quarterly performance feedback to the practice.
Approximately one third of practices within a participating health system will be randomized to receiving the STOP-HPV-LC intervention.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Standard of care control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Initiation (first dose) of HPV vaccination among 9-<13 year olds at or following a well care visit with a participating provider during the intervention period.
Time Frame: 12 months from start of intervention
The percent of children ages 9-<13 years of age who received their first dose of HPV vaccine at or following a well child care visit with a participating provider during the intervention-period (denominator is children ages 9-<13 with a well child visit during the study period at which they were due for their first dose).
12 months from start of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total implementation cost
Time Frame: 12 months from start of intervention
The difference in costs between arms will be used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
12 months from start of intervention
Initiation (first dose) of HPV vaccination among 13-17 year olds at or following a well care visit with a participating provider during the intervention period.
Time Frame: 12 months from start of intervention
The percent of children ages 13-17 years of age who received their first dose of HPV vaccine at or following a well child care visit with a participating provider during the intervention-period (denominator is children ages 13-17 years with a well child visit during the study period at which they were due for their first dose).
12 months from start of intervention
Initiation (first dose) of HPV vaccination among 9-<13 year olds at or following a well care visit with any provider during the intervention period.
Time Frame: 12 months from start of intervention
The percent of children ages 9-<13 years of age who received their first dose of HPV vaccine at or following a well child care visit with any provider (participating or not) during the intervention-period (denominator is children ages 9-<13 with a well child visit during the study period at which they were due for their first dose).
12 months from start of intervention
Initiation (first dose) of HPV vaccination among 13-17 year olds at or following a well care visit with any provider during the intervention period.
Time Frame: 12 months from start of intervention
The percent of children ages 13-17 years of age who received their first dose of HPV vaccine at or following a well child care visit with any provider (participating or not) during the intervention-period (denominator is children ages 13-17 years with a well child visit during the study period at which they were due for their first dose).
12 months from start of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Szilagyi, MD, MPH, University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 19, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 19, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 23-000022
  • 1R01CA276151-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine

Clinical Trials on STOP-HPV-Online

Subscribe