Voice-Induced Motor Intention to Enhance Upper Limb Rehabilitation Efficacy of Exoskeleton Robots for Stroke Patients

This study aims to investigate whether combining "motor imagery" (the mental visualization of movement) with robotic exoskeleton therapy can improve upper limb recovery in stroke patients. Conventional robotic therapy often involves passive movement driven by the machine. In this study, patients in the experimental group will use their own voice to trigger the robot (e.g., saying "bend arm") while simultaneously imagining the movement. The research will compare this voice-enhanced "active" approach with traditional passive robotic training to see if it better promotes brain-to-muscle signal recovery and improves overall arm function .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background and Rationale: Stroke is a leading cause of adult disability, and the "golden period" for rehabilitation requires intensive therapy to trigger muscle movement. Recent theories suggest that combining motor imagery with physical activity-known as Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) concepts-may be more effective than passive movement alone. However, complex EEG-based BCI is difficult to implement clinically. This study proposes a simplified "voice-controlled" interface to simulate the motor intent-to-action loop.

Study Design: This is a randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial involving 32 subacute or chronic stroke patients. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups for a 4-week intervention (5 sessions per week, 30 minutes per session).

Interventions:

Experimental Group (Voice + Exoskeleton): Patients will use the Nimbo single-joint robot. Before each movement, they will focus on imagining the target action for 2 seconds, then issue a standardized voice command (e.g., "bend hand") to trigger the robotic assistance.

Control Group (Passive Exoskeleton): Patients will receive conventional robotic-assisted training where the Nimbo exoskeleton moves the limb through a preset path without voice prompts or intentional imagery requirements.

Outcome Measures: Evaluations will be conducted at baseline (T0), week 2 (T1), and week 4 (T2).

Primary Outcome: Upper limb motor function measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE).

Secondary Outcomes: Brunnstrom stage (recovery phase), KVIQ-10 (subjective imagery), Laterality Judgment Task (objective imagery processing), Sense of Agency (SoA) questionnaire, and System Usability Scale (SUS).

Safety and Monitoring: Safety checks, including pain (NRS), fatigue (RPE), and skin inspections, will be performed after every session. Any adverse events will be reported to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and data safety monitoring personnel .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke diagnosed by CT or MRI
  • Stroke onset occurred at least 1 month prior to enrollment
  • Aged 20 to 80 years
  • Moderate to severe upper limb impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity score between 13 and 47)
  • Cognitive function sufficient to follow instructions (MMSE score > 20)
  • Stable medical condition with no severe pain in the affected upper limb

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe spasticity of the affected upper limb (Modified Ashworth Scale score > 2)
  • History of other neurological diseases (e.g., Parkinson's disease, brain tumor)
  • Serious orthopedic conditions or skin lesions on the affected upper limb that prevent robot use
  • Unstable epilepsy or severe psychiatric disorders
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Voice-Enhanced Motor Imagery Group
Participants in this group receive upper limb rehabilitation using the Nimbo single-joint robot combined with an "Active Imagery" protocol. Before each movement, patients focus on imagining the target action for 2 seconds and then issue a standardized voice command (e.g., "bend hand") to trigger the robotic assistance. The training is conducted for 30 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for a total of 4 weeks.
The same robotic exoskeleton used in a traditional passive rehabilitation mode where the device moves the limb automatically according to preset parameters.
Active Comparator: Passive Robotic Training Group
Participants in this group receive conventional passive robotic-assisted rehabilitation using the Nimbo single-joint robot. The robot moves the patient's limb through a preset range of motion automatically. There is no requirement for synchronized motor imagery or voice commands during the session. The training frequency and duration are identical to the experimental group: 30 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 4 weeks.
A robotic exoskeleton used with a voice-trigger interface. Patients perform motor imagery for 2 seconds followed by a voice command to activate the device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), and 4 weeks (T2).
A quantitative measure of upper limb motor recovery. The scale includes 33 items assessing reflexes, movement patterns, and coordination. Scores range from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better motor function.
Baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), and 4 weeks (T2).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brunnstrom Recovery Stage (Upper Limb)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), and 4 weeks (T2).
A 6-stage classification system used to categorize the degree of motor recovery in post-stroke hemiplegia, ranging from Stage I (flaccidity) to Stage VI (normal motor function).
Baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), and 4 weeks (T2).
Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ-10)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), and 4 weeks (T2).
Evaluates the clarity of visual imagery and intensity of kinesthetic imagery on a 5-point scale. Scores range from 10 to 50; higher scores indicate better imagery ability.
Baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), and 4 weeks (T2).
Laterality Judgment Task (LJT) - Accuracy and Reaction Time
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), and 4 weeks (T2).
Measures the mental rotation ability by identifying the laterality (left/right) of hand images. Accuracy (percentage) and reaction time (seconds) are recorded.
Baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), and 4 weeks (T2).
Sense of Agency (SoA) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), and 4 weeks (T2).
This questionnaire assesses the patient's subjective feeling of control over the robotic movement. It consists of 4 items scored on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from -3 (strongly disagree) to +3 (strongly agree). The total score is the sum of all items, ranging from -12 to +12. Higher scores indicate a stronger sense of agency (a greater feeling of being the cause of the robotic movement).
Baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), and 4 weeks (T2).
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: 4 weeks (T2).
The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a 10-item instrument for evaluating the usability of the voice-controlled robotic interface. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The final score is calculated by multiplying the sum of the item scores by 2.5, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better usability and higher user satisfaction.
4 weeks (T2).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TYGH114109

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on single-joint robot (Passive Mode)

Subscribe