- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07398573
Comparison of Caudal and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks With Pain Monitoring in Children
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks With Pain Monitoring in Lower Abdominal Surgery in Children
Study Type: Prospective, Randomized, Observational Clinical Study
Primary Purpose:
The primary objective of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of caudal block (CB) and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery using objective pain monitoring methods.
Key Questions Addressed:
Does the quadratus lumborum block provide superior intraoperative and postoperative analgesia compared to the caudal block, as measured by the Pain Monitor (PAM) and the FLACC scale?
Is the PAM monitor a reliable tool for objectively assessing nociception and pain in children who are unable to verbally express pain?
Which regional anesthesia technique more effectively delays the time to first postoperative analgesic requirement and reduces total analgesic consumption?
Which method is associated with higher parental satisfaction and fewer postoperative side effects, such as postoperative nausea and vomiting?
Comparison Groups:
Children receiving ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block will be compared with those receiving caudal block.
Intervention Group:
Bilateral quadratus lumborum block with 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine.
Active Comparator Group:
Caudal block with 1 mL/kg of 0.125% bupivacaine.
Participant Population:
A total of 68 children, aged 2 months to 6 years, with ASA physical status I-II, scheduled for elective lower abdominal surgeries (e.g., inguinal hernia repair, orchiopexy, hydrocele).
What Participants Will Do:
Participants will receive the assigned regional block as part of standard anesthetic care. Observational data will be collected as follows:
Intraoperative: Continuous nociception monitoring using the PAM device at predefined time points (during laryngeal mask airway insertion, block performance, surgical incision, 20 minutes after block performance, and extubation).
Postoperative: Pain assessment using the FLACC scale at 1, 2, and 4 hours in the post-anesthesia care unit.
Rescue analgesia (intravenous paracetamol) will be administered if the FLACC score is ≥4. Time to first analgesic administration and total analgesic consumption will be recorded.
Additional outcomes include postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) scores, Steward recovery scores, and parental satisfaction scores assessed using the Pediatric Parental Satisfaction Scale (PPPS).
Primary Outcome:
Intraoperative PAM index scores.
Secondary Outcomes:
Postoperative FLACC scores, time to first analgesic requirement, total postoperative analgesic consumption, incidence and severity of PONV, Steward recovery scores, and parental satisfaction (PPPS) scores.
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Study Title:
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Using a Pain Monitor in Children Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery
Study Objectives
Primary Objective:
To compare the analgesic efficacy of caudal block and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) using an objective pain monitoring device (Pain Monitor; PAM).
Secondary Objectives:
To evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of caudal block and QLB in lower abdominal surgeries.
To compare postoperative analgesia duration and analgesic requirements between the two groups.
To assess postoperative side effects associated with each regional anesthesia technique.
To evaluate postoperative parental satisfaction.
Materials and Methods
Children aged 2 months to 6 years with ASA physical status I-II, scheduled for elective lower abdominal surgeries (e.g., inguinal hernia repair, orchiopexy, hydrocele) performed by the pediatric surgery unit at Etlik City Hospital, will be included.
Participants will be randomized using the Research Randomizer program (https://www.randomizer.org/
) into either the caudal block group or the quadratus lumborum block group. A total of 68 participants will be enrolled, with 34 participants in each group.
Both regional anesthesia techniques and the use of the PAM device for intraoperative nociception monitoring are established components of standard clinical practice at the study institution. Therefore, all participants will receive these interventions as part of routine perioperative care, independent of study participation. The study design is prospective and observational, with no deviation from standard anesthetic management.
Demographic data, anesthesia duration, and surgical duration will be recorded. Written informed consent will be obtained from parents or legal guardians preoperatively.
Participants may receive routine oral premedication with midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) in the preoperative area. In the operating room, standard monitoring (SpO₂, ECG, non-invasive blood pressure) will be applied, followed by placement of the PAM monitor. A pediatric probe will be placed on the foot in children younger than 3 years, and an adult probe will be placed on the hand in children aged 3 years or older.
Standard anesthesia induction and maintenance will be performed (oxygen/air mixture, sevoflurane, propofol, laryngeal mask airway). Under ultrasound guidance, either a caudal block with 1 mL/kg of 0.125% bupivacaine (maximum 20 mL) or a bilateral quadratus lumborum block with 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine (maximum 20 mL) will be administered.
Intraoperative PAM index values will be recorded at five predefined time points:
During laryngeal mask airway insertion
During block performance
At the first surgical incision
20 minutes after block performance
During extubation
Following emergence from anesthesia, the PAM monitor will be removed, and participants will be observed for up to 4 hours postoperatively.
Postoperative assessments will include:
FLACC pain scores
PONV scores
Steward recovery scores
Parental satisfaction scores (PPPS)
These assessments will be performed at 1, 2, and 4 hours postoperatively.
Rescue analgesia with intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg) will be administered if the FLACC score is ≥4, and the time to first administration will be recorded. Postoperative complications will also be documented.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: DILARA YIGIT, Resident
- Phone Number: +905334719202
- Email: dilaraa3632@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: GULSEN KESKIN, Assoc.Prof.
- Phone Number: +905334133524
- Email: drgulsenkeskin@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
YENIMAHALLE
-
Ankara, YENIMAHALLE, Turkey (Türkiye), 06170
- Etlik City Hospital
-
Contact:
- DILARA MD YIGIT, resident
- Phone Number: +905334719202
- Email: dilaraa3632@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- GULSEN MD KESKIN, Assoc.Prof.
- Phone Number: +905334133524
- Email: drgulsenkeskin@gmail.com
-
Sub-Investigator:
- DILARA MD YIGIT, Resident
-
Principal Investigator:
- ASLI MD DONMEZ, Professor
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pediatric patients between 2 months and 6 years of age
- Pediatric patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery
- Family consent must be obtained
- No contraindications to block (infection at the block site), coagulopathy (INR <1.4, platelets >100,000), local anesthetic allergy)
- ASA I-II patients
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe systemic disease (ASA ≥III)
- Infection at the block site
- Coagulopathy (INR >1.4, platelets <100,000)
- Local anesthetic allergy
- Parental refusal
- Children aged <2 months or >6 years
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
QUADRATUS LUMBORUM BLOCK GROUP
Intraoperatively, under ultrasound guidance, bilateral QL block with 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine (maximum volume 20 ml) will be performed.
|
|
CAUDAL BLOCK GROUP
Under ultrasound guidance, a caudal block with 1 ml/kg of 0.125% bupivacaine (maximum volume 20 ml) will be performed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraoperative Pain Index Scores Measured by MEDSTORM Pain Monitor (PAM)
Time Frame: Perioperative period, at the following predefined time points: At airway instrumentation (laryngeal mask airway insertion) During regional block performance At skin incision 20 minutes after block performance At emergence from anesthesia (extubation)
|
The intraoperative analgesic efficacy of Caudal Block and Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block will be assessed using the MEDSTORM Pain Monitor (PAM). The PAM provides a Pain Index score ranging from 0 to 10, reflecting the patient's nociceptive state and the need for analgesic intervention. Lower scores indicate better analgesic efficacy. Pain Index scores will be recorded at predefined perioperative time points. It is hypothesized that the QL block will result in lower intraoperative Pain Index scores compared to the caudal block. Pain Index interpretation: 0-1: No additional analgesia required 2-3: Additional analgesia may be required 4-5: Additional analgesia is likely required 6-7: Additional analgesia is probably needed 8-10: Additional analgesia is required Perioperative period, at the following predefined time points: At airway instrumentation During regional block performance At skin incision 20 minutes after block performance At emergence from anesthesia |
Perioperative period, at the following predefined time points: At airway instrumentation (laryngeal mask airway insertion) During regional block performance At skin incision 20 minutes after block performance At emergence from anesthesia (extubation)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain Intensity Measured by FLACC Scale
Time Frame: Postoperative period, assessed at: 1 hour after surgery 2 hours after surgery 4 hours after surgery
|
Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using the FLACC behavioral pain scale in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery who receive either a Caudal Block or a Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block. The FLACC scale evaluates five behavioral categories: Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability. Each category is scored from 0 to 2, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. |
Postoperative period, assessed at: 1 hour after surgery 2 hours after surgery 4 hours after surgery
|
|
Time to First Postoperative Analgesic Requirement
Time Frame: Postoperative period, up to 4 hours after surgery
|
Outcome Measure Description The duration of postoperative analgesia will be assessed by recording the time from the end of surgery to the first requirement for rescue analgesia. The need for rescue analgesia will be determined based on postoperative pain assessment using the FLACC behavioral pain scale. A FLACC score ≥4 will be used as the predefined threshold for rescue analgesic administration. Unit of Measure Hours |
Postoperative period, up to 4 hours after surgery
|
|
Number of Participants Requiring Postoperative Rescue Analgesia
Time Frame: Postoperative period, assessed at: 1 hour 2 hours 4 hours after surgery
|
Outcome Measure Description The requirement for postoperative rescue analgesia will be recorded based on FLACC pain scores assessed at predefined postoperative time points. Participants with a FLACC score ≥4 will be considered as requiring rescue analgesia according to the institutional postoperative analgesia protocol. Unit of Measure Number of participants |
Postoperative period, assessed at: 1 hour 2 hours 4 hours after surgery
|
|
Total Postoperative Paracetamol Dose Administered
Time Frame: Time Frame Postoperative period, up to 4 hours after surgery
|
Total postoperative rescue analgesic consumption will be recorded. Rescue analgesia will be administered intravenously as paracetamol at a dose of 15 mg/kg when the FLACC score is ≥4. The cumulative paracetamol dose administered during the postoperative observation period will be calculated for each participant. Unit of Measure mg/kg |
Time Frame Postoperative period, up to 4 hours after surgery
|
|
Adverse Effects, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Severity Score
Time Frame: Postoperative period, assessed at: 1 hour 2 hours 4 hours after surgery
|
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) will be systematically evaluated using a standardized four-point ordinal scoring system to allow objective and consistent assessment of PONV severity in children receiving either a Caudal Block or a Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block. PONV severity will be classified as follows: Score 0: No nausea or vomiting Score 1: Mild nausea or retching not requiring treatment Score 2: Moderate nausea or vomiting requiring rescue antiemetic therapy Score 3: Severe, persistent nausea or vomiting refractory to initial rescue therapy This scoring system enables quantitative comparison of PONV severity between the two regional anesthesia techniques. Unit of Measure PONV severity score (0-3) |
Postoperative period, assessed at: 1 hour 2 hours 4 hours after surgery
|
|
Postoperative Parental Satisfaction Score Assessed by the Pediatric Parental Satisfaction Scale (PPPS)
Time Frame: Postoperative period, assessed at: 1 hour 2 hours 4 hours after surgery
|
Postoperative parental satisfaction with perioperative anesthesia care will be evaluated using the Pediatric Parental Satisfaction Scale (PPPS), a validated questionnaire designed to quantitatively assess the satisfaction of parents or guardians of pediatric patients. The PPPS uses a 5-point Likert scale, which is converted into a numerical satisfaction score, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. The score is interpreted as follows: Score 1: Very dissatisfied Score 2: Dissatisfied Score 3: Neutral Score 4: Satisfied Score 5: Very satisfied This scale allows objective comparison of parental satisfaction between children receiving Caudal Block and Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block. Unit of Measure PPPS score (1-5) |
Postoperative period, assessed at: 1 hour 2 hours 4 hours after surgery
|
|
Postoperative Recovery Score Assessed by the Steward Score
Time Frame: Postoperative period, assessed at: 1 hour 2 hours 4 hours after surgery
|
Outcome Measure Description Post-anesthetic recovery will be evaluated using the Steward Recovery Score, a standardized composite scoring system designed to provide a rapid and objective assessment of recovery following anesthesia in pediatric patients receiving either a Caudal Block or a Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block. The Steward Score evaluates three domains: Consciousness (0-2) Airway (0-2) Motor activity (0-2) Each domain is scored from 0 to 2, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating better recovery status. A total Steward Score of 6 is generally considered to reflect adequate recovery and readiness for transfer from the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Unit of Measure Steward Recovery Score (0-6) |
Postoperative period, assessed at: 1 hour 2 hours 4 hours after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: ASLI DONMEZ, Professor, Etlik City Hospital Health Science University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Aksu C, Sen MC, Akay MA, Baydemir C, Gurkan Y. Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Quadratus Lumborum Block for pediatric lower abdominal surgery: A double blinded, prospective, and randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:24-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
- Ledowski T. Objective monitoring of nociception: a review of current commercial solutions. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):e312-e321. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
- Zhu Y, Wu J, Qu S, Jiang P, Bohara C, Li Y. The analgesic effects of quadratus lumborum block versus caudal block for pediatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2025 Feb 6;13:1492876. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1492876. eCollection 2025.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- AESH-EK-2025-225 03/09/2025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pediatric Anesthesia
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaErasmus Medical Center; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Children... and other collaboratorsCompletedPediatric Anesthesia | General Anesthesia | ElectroencephalographyUnited States, Australia, Switzerland, China, Netherlands
-
Gødstrup HospitalAarhus University HospitalRecruitingPediatric Anesthesia | PROMs | Pediatric Surgery | PREMsDenmark
-
Bozok UniversityEnrolling by invitationPediatric AnesthesiaTurkey
-
Bürgerhospital FrankfurtCompleted
-
Tanta UniversityCompleted
-
Baylor College of MedicineRecruitingPediatric AnesthesiaUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompleted
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaNot yet recruitingPediatric Anesthesia | Pediatric Postoperative Recovery | Pediatric Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruitingPediatric Anesthesia | Airway Management | General Anesthesia | LMAChina
-
ACPM Medical CollegeCompletedPediatric Spinal Anesthesia