Olanzapine Dose Comparison for the Prevention of HER-INV: A Network Meta-Analysis

May 16, 2026 updated by: Fangchao Zheng, MD, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute

Olanzapine 2.5 mg Versus 5 mg Versus 10 mg in Highly Emetogenic Regimens: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Olanzapine is an effective antiemetic agent for preventing highly emetogenic regimens-induced nausea and vomiting (HER-INV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic regimens (HER). The optimal dose remains debated, with the standard 10 mg dose often causing significant daytime sedation. Recent evidence suggests that lower doses (2.5 mg and 5 mg) may offer comparable efficacy with improved tolerability. However, no head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly compare all three doses.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To compare the relative efficacy and safety of olanzapine at 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg, in combination with standard triple antiemetic prophylaxis, for the prevention of HER-INV in adult patients undergoing HER, using a network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs. RCTs comparing any two doses of olanzapine (2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg) in adults with solid tumors.

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Olanzapine was used to prevent nausea and vomiting (HER-INV) in solid tumors patients receiving highly emetogenic regimens
  2. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including conference abstracts if sufficient data are provided.
  3. Adult patients (≥18 years) with solid tumors receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).

3. Olanzapine at 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg, added to a standard triple antiemetic regimen (NK1 receptor antagonist + 5-HT3 receptor antagonist + dexamethasone).

4. Any of the other three olanzapine doses or placebo (2.5 mg vs. 5 mg vs. 10 mg, or vs. placebo).

5. At least one of the pre-specified efficacy or safety outcomes must be reported.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-solid tumors patients, non-randomized studies, observational studies, case reports, reviews.
  2. Studies involving pediatric populations, non-HEC regimens.
  3. Studies where olanzapine is used as rescue medication only.
  4. Studies with overlapping patient populations (the most recent or complete publication will be selected).

Information Sources: Electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science Core Collection. We will also search clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP) and manually review reference lists of relevant systematic reviews and included studies.

Risk of Bias Assessment: The risk of bias for individual RCTs will be assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) by two independent reviewers.

Subgroup Analyses: Subgroup analyses are planned by treatment regimens (such as: cisplatin-based vs. AC-based et al.).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China
        • Department of Medical Oncology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with solid tumors received different doses of olanzapine (2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg) as an add-on to standard antiemetic prophylaxis for the prevention of HER-induced nausea and vomiting in adult (≥18 years) patients with solid tumors receiving highly emetogenic regimens.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Olanzapine was used to prevent nausea and vomiting (HER-INV) in solid tumors patients receiving highly emetogenic regimens.
  2. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including conference abstracts if sufficient data are provided.
  3. Adult patients (≥18 years) with solid tumors receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).

3. Olanzapine at 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg, added to a standard triple antiemetic regimen (NK1 receptor antagonist + 5-HT3 receptor antagonist + dexamethasone).

4. Any of the other three olanzapine doses or placebo (2.5 mg vs. 5 mg vs. 10 mg, or vs. placebo).

5. At least one of the pre-specified efficacy or safety outcomes must be reported.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-solid tumors patients, non-randomized studies, observational studies, case reports, reviews.
  2. Studies involving pediatric populations, non-HEC regimens.
  3. Studies where olanzapine is used as rescue medication only. Studies with overlapping patient populations (the most recent or complete publication will be selected).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Olanzapine Doses 2.5mg
Olanzapine (dose: 2.5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 10 mg)
Olanzapine Doses 5mg
Olanzapine (dose: 2.5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 10 mg)
Olanzapine Doses 10mg
Olanzapine (dose: 2.5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 10 mg)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The complete response rate of nausea and vomiting in the overall phase (including acuted and delayed phase) by highly emetogenic regimens in solid tummors.
Time Frame: Nausea and vomiting complete response was assesed during the treatment period (or during the overall assessment period) after the initiation of highly emetogenic regimens, up to 4 weeks.
Nausea and vomiting complete response (CR; no vomiting or retching, no rescue medication) rate in the overall phase (including acuted [0-24h] and delayed [>24h] phase ) after highly emetogenic regimens in solid tummors .
Nausea and vomiting complete response was assesed during the treatment period (or during the overall assessment period) after the initiation of highly emetogenic regimens, up to 4 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 18, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Solid Tumours

Clinical Trials on Olanzapine (dose comparison: 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg)

Subscribe