- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07403370
Olanzapine Dose Comparison for the Prevention of HER-INV: A Network Meta-Analysis
Olanzapine 2.5 mg Versus 5 mg Versus 10 mg in Highly Emetogenic Regimens: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
To compare the relative efficacy and safety of olanzapine at 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg, in combination with standard triple antiemetic prophylaxis, for the prevention of HER-INV in adult patients undergoing HER, using a network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs. RCTs comparing any two doses of olanzapine (2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg) in adults with solid tumors.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Olanzapine was used to prevent nausea and vomiting (HER-INV) in solid tumors patients receiving highly emetogenic regimens
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including conference abstracts if sufficient data are provided.
- Adult patients (≥18 years) with solid tumors receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).
3. Olanzapine at 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg, added to a standard triple antiemetic regimen (NK1 receptor antagonist + 5-HT3 receptor antagonist + dexamethasone).
4. Any of the other three olanzapine doses or placebo (2.5 mg vs. 5 mg vs. 10 mg, or vs. placebo).
5. At least one of the pre-specified efficacy or safety outcomes must be reported.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-solid tumors patients, non-randomized studies, observational studies, case reports, reviews.
- Studies involving pediatric populations, non-HEC regimens.
- Studies where olanzapine is used as rescue medication only.
- Studies with overlapping patient populations (the most recent or complete publication will be selected).
Information Sources: Electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science Core Collection. We will also search clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP) and manually review reference lists of relevant systematic reviews and included studies.
Risk of Bias Assessment: The risk of bias for individual RCTs will be assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) by two independent reviewers.
Subgroup Analyses: Subgroup analyses are planned by treatment regimens (such as: cisplatin-based vs. AC-based et al.).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Shandong
-
Jinan, Shandong, China
- Department of Medical Oncology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Olanzapine was used to prevent nausea and vomiting (HER-INV) in solid tumors patients receiving highly emetogenic regimens.
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including conference abstracts if sufficient data are provided.
- Adult patients (≥18 years) with solid tumors receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).
3. Olanzapine at 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg, added to a standard triple antiemetic regimen (NK1 receptor antagonist + 5-HT3 receptor antagonist + dexamethasone).
4. Any of the other three olanzapine doses or placebo (2.5 mg vs. 5 mg vs. 10 mg, or vs. placebo).
5. At least one of the pre-specified efficacy or safety outcomes must be reported.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-solid tumors patients, non-randomized studies, observational studies, case reports, reviews.
- Studies involving pediatric populations, non-HEC regimens.
- Studies where olanzapine is used as rescue medication only. Studies with overlapping patient populations (the most recent or complete publication will be selected).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Olanzapine Doses 2.5mg
|
Olanzapine (dose: 2.5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 10 mg)
|
|
Olanzapine Doses 5mg
|
Olanzapine (dose: 2.5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 10 mg)
|
|
Olanzapine Doses 10mg
|
Olanzapine (dose: 2.5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 5 mg) vs. olanzapine (dose: 10 mg)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The complete response rate of nausea and vomiting in the overall phase (including acuted and delayed phase) by highly emetogenic regimens in solid tummors.
Time Frame: Nausea and vomiting complete response was assesed during the treatment period (or during the overall assessment period) after the initiation of highly emetogenic regimens, up to 4 weeks.
|
Nausea and vomiting complete response (CR; no vomiting or retching, no rescue medication) rate in the overall phase (including acuted [0-24h] and delayed [>24h] phase ) after highly emetogenic regimens in solid tummors .
|
Nausea and vomiting complete response was assesed during the treatment period (or during the overall assessment period) after the initiation of highly emetogenic regimens, up to 4 weeks.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SDTHEC-IF
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Solid Tumours
-
Racura Oncology LtdEmerald ClinicalRecruitingSolid Tumours | Advanced Solid TumoursHong Kong, Australia, South Korea
-
AP Biosciences Inc.Avance Clinical Pty Ltd.RecruitingSolid TumoursAustralia
-
Bristol-Myers SquibbRecruitingSolid TumoursUnited States, Japan, Denmark, Spain
-
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustInstitute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom; Onyx Therapeutics, Inc.Completed
-
Debiopharm International SATerminatedSolid TumoursKorea, Republic of, United States, Taiwan, Spain, Singapore
-
AstraZenecaCompleted
-
AstraZenecaCompleted
-
AstraZenecaCompletedSolid TumoursUnited Kingdom, France, Korea, Republic of, Germany, Spain, Denmark
-
AstraZenecaCompletedSolid TumoursUnited States, Spain, Belgium, France, Korea, Republic of, United Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Olanzapine (dose comparison: 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg)
-
BayerMerck Sharp & Dohme LLC; Duke Clinical Research Institute; Canadian VIGOUR CentreCompletedChronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionSpain, United States, Belgium, Singapore, Taiwan, Canada, Japan, Italy, Austria, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, Israel, Poland, Portugal, Hungary, Russian Federation, Argentina, Colombia, Malaysia, South Africa
-
Eisai Co., Ltd.Completed
-
Shanxi Kangbao Biological Product Co., Ltd.Institute of Pathogen Biology, Beijing, ChinaCompleted
-
Eisai Inc.Completed
-
BiogenAbbVieCompletedMItochondrial MyopathiesUnited States, Denmark
-
CSPC ZhongQi Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd.Unknown
-
AstraZenecaParexelCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
PfizerCompleted
-
MedImmune LLCCompletedRelapsed/Refractory Aggressive B-cell LymphomasUnited States