Effect of Cryotherapy on Anesthetic Success and Pain in Irreversible Pulpitis

February 10, 2026 updated by: Ayşe Tuğba Eminsoy Avcı, TC Erciyes University

Effect Of Cryotherapy On Anesthetıc Success And Intraoperatıve Paın In Mandıbular Premolars Wıth Irreversıble Pulpıtıs: A Prospectıve Randomızed Clınıcal Trıal

This prospective randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effects of different anesthesia protocols on anesthetic success and intraoperative pain during root canal treatment of mandibular premolars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. A total of 100 systemically healthy patients were randomly allocated into four groups: infiltration anesthesia alone, inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) alone, infiltration anesthesia combined with cryotherapy, and IANB combined with cryotherapy. Cryotherapy was applied intraorally for 5 minutes immediately after anesthetic administration.

The effectiveness of anesthesia was confirmed using electric pulp testing and cold testing prior to treatment. Root canal therapy was completed in a single visit by a calibrated operator. Intraoperative pain was assessed during access cavity preparation using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Anesthetic success was defined as the presence of no or mild pain, whereas moderate or severe pain indicated anesthetic failure and required supplemental anesthesia.

The primary objective of the study was to determine whether the adjunctive use of cryotherapy improves anesthetic success and reduces intraoperative pain in mandibular premolars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. The null hypothesis was that no significant differences would be observed among the study groups in terms of anesthetic success or intraoperative pain intensity.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Systemically healthy patients classified as ASA I or II, aged between 18 and 60 years,
  • Presence of a restorable mandibular premolar tooth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis,
  • History of spontaneous pain or lingering pain elicited by thermal stimuli,
  • Positive response with lingering pain to cold testing (Endo Ice; Coltene, Altstätten, Switzerland),
  • Positive response at low current levels to electric pulp testing (Parkell Inc., USA),
  • Teeth with closed apex and no radiographic evidence of periapical pathology (intact periodontal ligament space and absence of periapical radiolucency),
  • Patients presenting with moderate or severe preoperative pain, as assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had taken analgesic, anti-inflammatory, or opioid medication within the last 12 hours before treatment,
  • Patients with systemic conditions that may affect pain perception, inflammatory response, or healing,
  • History of antibiotic use within the previous month or requirement for antibiotic prophylaxis,
  • Teeth presenting with clinical or radiographic signs of pulp necrosis or apical periodontitis (Pain on percussion or palpation, presence of sinus tract or swelling, presence of periapical radiolucency),
  • Teeth with root resorption, immature apices, severe coronal destruction preventing proper isolation, or calcified canals,
  • Teeth that had undergone previous endodontic treatment, including pulpotomy or root canal filling,
  • Patients with neurological or psychiatric conditions that could interfere with pain perception or accurate pain reporting,
  • Inability to achieve adequate isolation with a rubberdam.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: infiltration anesthesia
Local anesthesia was achieved using buccal infiltration with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine.
Cryotherapy was applied immediately after completion of the anesthetic injection. Small ice packs wrapped in sterile gauze were placed intraorally on the buccal vestibular surface adjacent to the treated mandibular premolar. Patients were instructed to keep the ice pack in position for 5 minutes. In cases where extreme cold sensation or burning discomfort was reported, patients were asked to remove the ice pack for 1 minute before reapplication
Experimental: mandibular anesthesia
Local anesthesia was achieved using mandibular block anesthesia with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine.
Cryotherapy was applied immediately after completion of the anesthetic injection. Small ice packs wrapped in sterile gauze were placed intraorally on the buccal vestibular surface adjacent to the treated mandibular premolar. Patients were instructed to keep the ice pack in position for 5 minutes. In cases where extreme cold sensation or burning discomfort was reported, patients were asked to remove the ice pack for 1 minute before reapplication

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative pain
Time Frame: Baseline/During the Operation
Intraoperative pain intensity assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (1-10) during access cavity preparation.
Baseline/During the Operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irreversible Pulpitis

Clinical Trials on infiltration anesthesia alone

Subscribe