PEP Buddy in Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PEPR)

February 12, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

A Randomized, Sham Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of a Positive End Expiratory Device for Accelerating and Maintaining Pulmonary Rehabilitation Gains

In this study, the investigators will test Veterans with COPD in Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Between two groups, the investigators will give one group a device that assists with breathing and symptoms and the other receives a 'sham' device which does not provide these benefits. The investigators will test to see if the symptoms and exercise capacity of the group who receives this device improves faster in Pulmonary Rehabilitation and has longer lasting benefits after the end of Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

In this randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial, the investigators will test the effectiveness of the use of a positive expiratory device (PEP Buddy) vs. sham in participants with COPD in Pulmonary Rehabilitation and after discharge from Pulmonary Rehabilitation for up to one year. The investigators will compare changes in quality of life metrics and measurements of functional capacity between the intervention and sham groups over the course of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45220-2213
        • Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Robert Matthew Burkes, MD MS
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106-1702
        • Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veteran
  • Referral to Pulmonary Rehabilitation for COPD
  • FEV1 <80% predicted
  • Participants must be able to exercise on 4L/m nasal cannula O2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those deemed by the study personnel to have a lung disease other than COPD impacting their daily dyspnea
  • Those that are unable to perform study procedures or are unwilling or unable to use PEP Buddy
  • Those that have a component of lung disease driven by aspiration or neurological conditions affecting the face or oropharynx
  • Those with a life expectancy of <1 year
  • Those with a known surgical intervention that will require a prolonged recovery in the year after enrollment
  • Those with a malignancy beyond Stage I or non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Those shown shown to have memory loss of MOCA testing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PEP Buddy
This arm will be provided with a portable device that provides 5-7 cm H2O of expiratory pressure, to be used when subjectively breathless
This is a small, portable device worn about the neck with a lanyard, that can be used to control symptoms of breathlessness associated with chronic lung disease.
Sham Comparator: Sham
This arm will be provided with a portable device that appears the same as PEP Buddy but provides 1-3 cm H2O of expiratory pressure, to be used when subjectively breathless
A Device that appears the same as PEP Buddy but only provides the expiratory pressure of the standard-of-care pursed lip breathing
Other Names:
  • Sham

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
San Diego Shortness of breath Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 Months
This is a standardized survey used to quantify the impact of daily respiratory symptoms on quality of life. This will be collected on enrollment and the investigators will compare the change between groups at Weeks 3, 6, 9, and 12 and at six-and twelve-months after enrollment.
12 Months
Daily steps measured by wrist-wron accelerometer
Time Frame: 12 Months
Using accelerometry, the investigators will show the changes in daily step counts between groups over the one year of time in the study.
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
One-Minute Sit to Stand test
Time Frame: 12 Months
The investigators will perform this test at enrollment and at weeks 3, 6, 9, and 12 as well as six-and twelve-months after enrollment and compare between groups. This test calculates the number of times a participant can sit and rise from a chair over the course of a minute.
12 Months
Six Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: 12 months
A standard test of exercise capacity in those with chronic lung disease. The investigators will assess changes in the six-minute walk test difference from enrollment at Weeks 3, 6, 9, and 12 in the study and at six-and twelve-months after the conclusion of the study.
12 months
St. George Respiratory Questionaire
Time Frame: 12 Months
The investigators will compare the values between groups from enrollment at Weeks 3, 6, 9, and 12 and at six-and twelve-months after enrollment. This is a standard survey form in which participants report the severity and daily impact of respiratory symptoms and how they may inhibit daily activity.
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Matthew Burkes, MD MS, Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 29, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 29, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RRD6-010-24W
  • 1I01RD000440-01A2 (Other Grant/Funding Number: VA ORD)
  • 25-81 (Other Identifier: VA Central IRB Proposal Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The investigators will share data with VA researchers that will be de-identified via Safe Harbor approach. However, if a non-VA researcher requests aggregate data, the investigators will work with local research office, facility privacy officer, and information security officer to identify an applicable agreement for data sharing. No VA data will include any PHI to any non-VA researchers requesting VA data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will not be shared until the close of the study (March 2025). The investigators will then share data for six years after close of study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigators ask that any requesting entity contact the Primary Investigator by e-mail to begin a request for data via VA processes.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD

Clinical Trials on PEP Buddy

Subscribe