The Use of an Audio-visual Method in Counseling for Pediatric Lumbar Puncture Procedure

February 11, 2026 updated by: Aza Said Hamood Al-Sawafi, Oman Ministry of Health

The Use of an Audio-visual Method in Counseling for Pediatric Lumbar Puncture Procedure. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the use of usual verbal counseling supported by a video illustration comparing to the use of usual verbal counseling alone prior to obtaining spinal fluid ( Lumbar puncture - LP ) procedure, from children suspected to have brain infection in the Emergency department settings.

This trial is trying to answer if use of video illustration is associated with higher acceptance rate for the procedure by the parents of children who are suspected to have brain infection (meningitis) in the pediatric emergency room settings at a tertiary hospital.

Who is suitable to participate? Parents/legal guardians of all children aged between 1day to 12 years, who are suspected to have brain infection (meningitis) attending the Pediatric emergency room at the Royal Hospital.

Participants will:

Be counseled using verbal snd video method = Intervention group OR verbal method only = Control group The Researchers will collect the acceptance rate in performing LP in both groups.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a clinical trial with the following objectives:

* The primary objective: To determine whether using an audio-visual intervention in counseling for emergent Lumber Puncture procedure will increase the gain of consents from parents/legal guardians of 0-13 years old children who are seen at the Royal Hospital Pediatrics Emergency Department compared to the current standard verbal counseling.

  • The secondary objectives:

    1. To describe the reasons for LP refusal prospectively.
    2. To study the perspectives of involved health care workers in using the audio-visual method in counseling for LP in an emergency setting.
  • The study methodology:

A pragmatic, open label randomized controlled trial, with two parallel groups of parents randomized in a 1:1 ratio and stratified by three age groups according to child's age.

* Study population and settings: This study to be conducted at the Pediatric Emergency Department in Royal Hospital. The hospital is located in Muscat, the capital city, which has a population of approximately 1.5 million

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

154

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All Parents/legal guardians of 0-13 years old children who were identified to get an emergent lumbar puncture procedure, as decided by the attending physician during the Emergency Department shift.
  • Participants who speak Arabic or English

Exclusion Criteria:

- Participants who are not Arabic nor English speakers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Audiovisual counseling
The intervention group will be receiving the audiovisual material with verbal counseling. This involved the usual face-to-face verbal explanations, supplemented by a video animation in Arabic with English subtitles, designed specifically for this trial.
Use of Audio-visual tool (Video) during counseling session
No Intervention: Verbal counseling
The control group received verbal counseling alone. This was a usual face-to-face verbal explanations and discussion between the physician and the legal guardians about the LP procedure. No specific instructions or scientific materials were provided which reflects the current standard care and real counseling practices.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The acceptance rate of the Lumbar Puncture (LP) procedure
Time Frame: Within 24 hours from intervention (During their stay in the pediatric ER)
The acceptance rate of the LP procedure, which was obtained directly from the parents/legal guardians after the counseling in Emergency Department from both groups. Physicians documented acceptance or refusal in the Hospital Information System (HIS).
Within 24 hours from intervention (During their stay in the pediatric ER)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A survey for the parents prepared to get their opinion and compare their experience (between the intervention and control group)
Time Frame: Within 48 hours from the intervention
A survey for the parents prepared to get their opinion and compare their experience (between the intervention and control group) using 4 key questions: their understanding of the procedure, perception of its safety, perception of painfulness, and overall comfort with their child undergoing lumbar puncture. Participants rated each item on a 1-10 Likert scale. The survey to be completed after admission-typically within 48 hours-through in-person interviewing the family or via phone calls.
Within 48 hours from the intervention
Refusal reasons collected during interview time with parents
Time Frame: Within 48 hours from the intervention
The reasons for LP refusal were collected prospectively from parents during the interview time and after the survey. All who refused the procedure in either group were asked to answer a closed-ended question listing reasons: lack of knowledge about LP, not being convinced of its diagnostic importance, or fear of complications. If complications were selected as a reason, they were then asked an open-ended question to specify the side effects or complications they were concerned about.
Within 48 hours from the intervention
online survey with Likert scales
Time Frame: Within 4 weeks from using the intervention
The Physicians' Perspectives on using an Audio-visual method for Lumbar Puncture counseling in the Emergency Department will be assessed using an online survey with 5-point Likert Agreement Scale related to their agreement level (Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, disagree, strongly disagree), their feeling, the challenges faced implementing the method in the Emergency Department and if they would recommend standardizing it for LP counseling.
Within 4 weeks from using the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Aza S AlSawafi, MD, The Royal Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • 17th EIP abstract book in critical public health. (2025). Critical Public Health, 35(sup1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2578123

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MoH/CSR/24/28011
  • MoHERI/BFP/OMSB/2024 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Meningitis in Children

Clinical Trials on Audio-visual tool/ Video

Subscribe