Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of Balloon Assisted Enteroscopy Assisted Narrow Incision and Balloon Dilation in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease Small Intestinal Stenosis (CD stenosis)

This study is designed as a controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of balloon-assisted enteroscopy-guided radial incision therapy for the treatment of stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease. The study aims to compare therapeutic outcomes, procedure-related complications, and recurrence rates in patients with stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease undergoing balloon-assisted enteroscopy-guided radial incision therapy. The results are expected to provide a novel and reliable treatment option for patients with stricturing Crohn's disease and to lay a foundation for improving disease-related symptoms and quality of life.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Shenglong Xia, Phd
  • Phone Number: +86-19857128950
  • Email: xsl89@zju.edu.cn

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 16 and 75 years.
  2. Diagnosis of Crohn's disease with primary or secondary small bowel stricture confirmed by imaging studies, or small bowel stricture identified by enteroscopy.
  3. Inadequate response to conventional medical therapy and step-up treatment strategies.
  4. Stricture length less than 5 cm.
  5. Signed informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Bowel wall thickening with Limberg grade IV blood flow on intestinal ultrasound, or presence of complications such as perforation, fistula, deep ulcer, inflammatory mass, or abscess.
  2. Deep ulcer in the stricture segment observed by enteroscopy, potentially involving the muscular layer.
  3. Presence of strictures in the esophagus, stomach, or duodenum.
  4. Presence of colorectal stricture or ileocecal valve stricture.
  5. Small bowel stricture complicated by abscess, fistula, or severe angulation.
  6. Patients with ≥3 small bowel strictures or stricture length ≥5 cm.
  7. Strictures previously treated with stent placement, dilation, or incision but without sustained symptom-free remission for at least 1 year.
  8. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  9. Inability to undergo endoscopic treatment.
  10. Severe coagulation disorders (platelet count <70,000/μL, INR >1.5).
  11. Concomitant advanced tumors or other severe organ diseases.
  12. Suspected localized intestinal malignancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: No Intervention
Patients in this arm will not receive endoscopic interventional treatment for small bowel strictures and will be managed with standard medical therapy and clinical observation.
No Intervention
Experimental: Balloon-assisted enteroscopy-guided balloon dilation
Patients in this arm will undergo balloon dilation of small bowel strictures under balloon-assisted enteroscopy to relieve luminal narrowing.
Balloon-assisted enteroscopy-guided balloon dilation
Experimental: Balloon-assisted enteroscopy-guided stricture incision
Patients in this arm will receive balloon-assisted enteroscopy-guided radial incision of small bowel strictures under direct endoscopic visualization.
Balloon-assisted enteroscopy-guided stricture incision versus balloon dilation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients not requiring additional therapeutic interventions at 1-year follow-up
Time Frame: 1 year
Percentage of patients who do not require any new therapeutic intervention, including endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD), endoscopic stricture incision (EST), or surgery, within 1 year after the initial procedure.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients not requiring additional therapeutic interventions at 3-year follow-up
Time Frame: 3 years
Percentage of patients who do not require any new therapeutic intervention (EBD, EST, or surgery) within 3 years after the initial procedure.
3 years
Proportion of patients not requiring additional therapeutic interventions at 5-year follow-up
Time Frame: 5 years
Percentage of patients who do not require any new therapeutic intervention (EBD, EST, or surgery) within 5 years after the initial procedure.
5 years
Safety assessment of the two treatment methods
Time Frame: Within 2 months post-procedure
Evaluation of procedure-related complications, including postoperative bleeding, perforation, and any adverse events (AEs) or serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring within 2 months after the procedure.
Within 2 months post-procedure
Immediate technical success of the procedure
Time Frame: At the time of procedure
Assessment of successful passage of the endoscope through the stricture immediately after balloon dilation or stricture incision.
At the time of procedure
Symptom-free duration within 1 year post-procedure
Time Frame: 1 year
Duration of symptom-free period within 1 year after the procedure, defined as a score ≤1 on the obstruction symptom assessment scale.
1 year
Cost analysis of the two treatment methods
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-procedure
Comparative analysis of medical costs associated with balloon dilation versus stricture incision, including procedure, hospitalization, and follow-up expenses.
Up to 1 year post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yan Chen, PhD, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CD - Crohn's Disease

Clinical Trials on No Interventions

Subscribe