Effects of Peloid Therapy in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

February 10, 2026 updated by: İrem Çiftler Gayret., Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital

Investigation of the Effects of Peloidotherapy on Pain Severity, Functional Status, and Ultrasonographic Findings in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blind Study

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common condition caused by pressure on a nerve at the wrist. It can lead to pain, numbness, weakness, and difficulty using the hand during daily activities.

In this clinical trial, researchers will study a non-drug treatment approach for people with carpal tunnel syndrome. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive a wrist splint and a home exercise program. The other group will receive peloidotherapy in addition to the same splint and exercise program.

Pain, hand function, daily activities, quality of life, hand strength, and ultrasound findings of the median nerve will be evaluated before treatment, at the end of treatment, and during follow-up periods.

The goal of this study is to determine whether adding peloidotherapy to wrist splint and a home exercise program provides additional benefits in reducing pain and improving hand function in people with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common compressive neuropathy caused by entrapment of the median nerve at the wrist. It is characterized by pain, numbness, paresthesia, weakness, and functional limitations of the hand, which may negatively affect daily activities and quality of life. Conservative treatment approaches are frequently preferred, particularly in mild to moderate cases, and include wrist splinting, exercise programs, and physical therapy modalities.

This randomized, prospective, single-blind clinical trial was conducted to investigate the effects of peloidotherapy as an adjunct to wrist splint and a home exercise program in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome. Eligible participants diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups.

The control group received a wrist splint and a structured home exercise program. The intervention group received peloidotherapy in addition to the same wrist splint and home exercise program. Peloidotherapy was applied in standardized 15 sessions under controlled conditions throughout the treatment period.

Clinical and functional assessments were performed at four time points: at baseline before treatment (week 0), at the end of the treatment period (week 3), and during follow-up at one month (week 7) and three months (week 15) after completion of treatment. This assessment schedule was designed to evaluate both short-term and sustained effects of the interventions.

Outcome measures included pain intensity, functional status of the hand, functional disability, quality of life, hand grip strength, neuropathic pain characteristics, and ultrasonographic evaluation of the median nerve, including measurements of the nerve cross-sectional area.

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the addition of peloidotherapy to wrist splint and a home exercise program provides additional benefits in reducing pain and improving hand function in individuals with carpal tunnel syndrome. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of changes in quality of life, hand grip strength, neuropathic pain features, and ultrasonographic findings during follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with mild or mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by electromyography (EMG)
  • Presence of clinical symptoms for at least 3 months
  • Age 18 years and older
  • No limitation in wrist joint range of motion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Polyneuropathy
  • Pregnancy
  • Presence of underlying metabolic diseases (diabetes mellitus, inflammatory rheumatic diseases, thyroid disorders)
  • Presence of hand osteoarthritis
  • Previous wrist or hand surgery
  • Severe carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by electromyography (EMG)
  • Thenar muscle atrophy
  • Corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome or use of a wrist splint within the last 6 months
  • History of malignancy
  • Receipt of peloid therapy or any physical therapy modality for carpal tunnel syndrome within the last 6 months
  • Contraindications to peloid therapy (impaired skin integrity or active infection at the application site)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Non-Peloid Therapy Group
Participants receive treatment consisting of wrist splinting and a structured home exercise program. No peloid therapy is administered.
Participants used a neutral-position wrist splint as part of conservative treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Participants performed a standardized home exercise program including median nerve gliding exercises and tendon gliding exercises for the wrist and hand.
Experimental: Peloid Therapy Group
Participants receive wrist splinting and a structured home exercise program in addition to peloid therapy. Peloid therapy is applied at 45 °C for 30 minutes per session, for a total of 15 sessions.
Participants used a neutral-position wrist splint as part of conservative treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.
Participants performed a standardized home exercise program including median nerve gliding exercises and tendon gliding exercises for the wrist and hand.
Peloid therapy is applied at 45 °C for 30 minutes per session, for a total of 15 sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), 3-month follow-up (week 15)
Symptom severity and functional status measured using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), which includes Symptom Severity and Functional Status subscales. Each item is scored from 1 to 5 and subscale scores are calculated as the mean of item scores. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms and functional limitation.
Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), 3-month follow-up (week 15)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), and 3-month follow-up (week 15).
Median nerve cross-sectional area was measured using ultrasonography.
Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), and 3-month follow-up (week 15).
QuickDASH Score
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), 3-month follow-up (week 15)
Upper extremity disability measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), 3-month follow-up (week 15)
Visual Analog Scale for Pain at Rest
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), 3-month follow-up (week 15)
Pain intensity at rest measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), scored from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), 3-month follow-up (week 15)
Visual Analog Scale for Pain During Activity
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), 3-month follow-up (week 15)
Pain intensity during activity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), scored from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), 3-month follow-up (week 15)
Visual Analog Scale for Night Pain
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), 3-month follow-up (week 15)
Night pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), scored from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), 3-month follow-up (week 15)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Form-12 Health Survey Scores (SF-12)
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), and 3-month follow-up (week 15).
Health-related quality of life assessed using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Health Survey. The questionnaire provides Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status and quality of life.
Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), and 3-month follow-up (week 15).
DN4 Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), and 3-month follow-up (week 15).
Neuropathic pain evaluated using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire. Total score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater likelihood of neuropathic pain, and scores of 4 or more suggest neuropathic pain.
Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), and 3-month follow-up (week 15).
Hand Grip Strength
Time Frame: Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), and 3-month follow-up (week 15).
Hand grip strength measured using a hand dynamometer and recorded in kilograms (kg). Higher values indicate greater muscle strength.
Baseline (week 0), end of treatment (week 3), 1-month follow-up (week 7), and 3-month follow-up (week 15).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ebru Yılmaz Yalçınkaya, MD, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Principal Investigator: Serap Seringeç Karabulut, MD, Department of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical and legal restrictions related to patient confidentiality and institutional policies.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Clinical Trials on Wrist Splint

Subscribe