Cognitive-Behavioral and Digital Therapy for Suicide Risk in Eating Disorders

February 13, 2026 updated by: Aleix Jorba Chacón, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona

Efficacy of Cognitive-behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Digital Therapy (DT) in the Prevention of Suicide Risk in Patients With Eating Disorders (ED): a Randomized Clinical Trial.

The purpose of this study is to determine if adding a digital intervention to standard cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is more effective in preventing suicide risk and reducing eating disorder symptoms. Participants will be women between 18 and 65 years old who have recently experienced suicidal ideation or attempts. One group will receive standard group therapy, while the other will receive group therapy plus a mobile application and digital monitoring devices. The goal is to see if digital tools can improve clinical outcomes and safety for patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitari Parc Tauli
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gender: Female.
  • Age between 18 and 65 years old.
  • Clinically stable and able to provide written informed consent.
  • Subjects included in the "Suicide Risk Code" (Codi Risc Suïcidi - CRS) program due to recent suicidal ideation or suicide attempts.
  • Patients with a diagnosis of an Eating Disorder (ED).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of intellectual disability or cognitive impairment that prevents understanding the therapy or the study requirements.
  • Diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder or any Psychotic Disorder.
  • Current active substance abuse or dependence.
  • Any medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, makes participation unsafe or unfeasible.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) + Digital Therapy (DT)
DigitaI therapy: includes a mobile app with a digital safety plan (warning signs, coping strategies, contact persons, etc.) activated by real-time risk assessments (2-4 random questions daily)
Active Comparator: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)
8 structured group sessions based on Christopher Fairburn's program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) Score.
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), End of treatment (Week 8), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
The EAT-26 is a self-report questionnaire used to assess eating disorder risk and symptoms. It consists of 26 items. Total scores range from 0 to 78, where higher scores indicate greater severity of eating disorder symptoms.
Baseline (Week 0), End of treatment (Week 8), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Change from Baseline in Bulimic Investigatory Test Edinburgh (BITE) Score.
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), End of treatment (Week 8), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
The BITE is used to identify individuals with binge-eating and compensatory behaviors. It consists of two subscales: Symptoms (0-30 points) and Severity (0-39 points). We will report the Total Score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of bulimic symptoms.
Baseline (Week 0), End of treatment (Week 8), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Change from Baseline in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score.
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), End of treatment (Week 8), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
The C-SSRS Full Scale is a clinical tool used to assess the full spectrum of suicidal ideation and behavior. It consists of two main sections: (1) Suicidal Ideation (A severity scale ranging from 0 (no ideation) to 5 (active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent) and (2) Suicidal Behavior (A scale that tracks the presence of actual, interrupted, or aborted attempts, and preparatory acts rated as Yes/No). For this outcome, we will report the Suicidal Ideation Severity Score. Higher scores indicate a greater severity of suicidal ideation.
Baseline (Week 0), End of treatment (Week 8), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score.
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), End of treatment (Week 8), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
The PHQ-9 is a 9-item tool used to monitor the severity of depression. Scores range from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Baseline (Week 0), End of treatment (Week 8), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
Change from Baseline in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score.
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), End of treatment (Week 8), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.
The GAD-7 is a 7-item scale used to measure the severity of generalized anxiety. Scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety symptoms.
Baseline (Week 0), End of treatment (Week 8), 6-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicide Risk

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) + Digital Therapy (DT)

Subscribe