Ultrasonographical Assessment of Airway Indices in Pregnancy

February 17, 2026 updated by: Mohamed Gaber Ahmed, South Valley University

Clinical and Ultrasonographic Assessment of Airway Indices Among Nonpregnant, Normotensive Pregnant and Pre-eclamptic Patients: a Prospective Observational Study

Clinical and ultrasound indices of airway, in addition to laryngoscopic view will be assessed and compared among three groups of patients: non pregnant, pregnant with normal blood pressure, preeclampsia patients undergoing various surgeries under general anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Tracheal intubation (TI) through direct laryngoscopy is often performed in patients to establish an airway to provide adequate ventilation and oxygenation, and/or to protect the airway from aspiration of oral and pharyngeal secretions. Difficult intubation occurs due to insufficient vision of the larynx during direct laryngoscopy. Some constraints such as full stomach and aspiration risk, unknown past medical and allergy history may make the actual number of difficult intubation in operating room. It seems that, to prevent complications due to repeated attempt for intubation (arrythmia, hypoxia, …), early detection of probable difficult laryngoscopy cases is of great importance in the operating room. Therefore, various screening methods and scales have been defined in this regard . Cormack-Lehane classification and Mallampati are among screening methods that is used to predict difficult airway and laryngoscopy cases; However, all have considerable limitations . Therefore, the search for a simple, non-invasive technique that provides a more accurate assessment of the patient's airway still continues. The ideal method is expected to be fast, accessible, simple and non-invasive .Today, portable ultrasound devices are widely available in OR and recently studies have focused on its capabilities in terms of airway management . At present, airway ultrasonography is not yet used as a common method for airway assessment. Although several parameters of airway ultrasound have been mentioned in various studies as difficult airway prediction indicators, research is still ongoing to obtain easy and accurate measures . Therefore, this study performed to investigate the relationship between some upper airway ultrasound assessment parameters with difficult laryngoscopy / difficult intubation in pregnant and preeclamptic females and aim to use these parameters to assist physician to decide about difficult laryngoscopy/ difficult intubation and consider as predictors beside the traditional methods.

The first step in airway management is the assessment of various airway indices. Various anatomical and physiological factors place pregnant females at greater risk of airway management complications and difficult intubation. Hypertensive conditions of pregnancy are associated with aggravated changes in the airway, including a narrower upper airway compared with healthy pregnant females. In routine clinical practice, quick and easy bedside assessments are performed pre-operatively to evaluate the airway. These methods have high interobserver variability and only fair to moderate sensitivity and specificity. The role of ultrasound in airway assessment is encouraging as anatomical structures can be visualised in supraglottic, glottis and subglottic views. With the development of better probes, high resolution imaging, real-time pictures and clinical experience, In this prospective study, we assessed the airway indices of non-pregnant, normotensive pregnant and preeclamptic pregnant females using both clinical parameters and ultrasonographic assessment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Qena Governorate
      • Qina, Qena Governorate, Egypt, 83511
        • Recruiting
        • Qena University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

non pregnant, normotensive pregnant and preeclamptic patients who are undergoing general anesthesia, and also apply to the inclusion criteria and have non of the exclusion criteria mentioned above.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • -normotensive pregnant
  • pre-eclamptic patients.
  • nonpregnant females in child bearing period .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients excluded were women at <32 weeks' gestation or with Eclampsia .
  • height <150 cm, body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2 .
  • predicted airwy difficulty due to any other cause as neck swelling , facial deformity and prominent teeth.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Non Pregnant
non pregnant patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia
pregnant normotensive
pregnant normotensive patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia
preeclampsia
preeclampsia patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sperficial ultrasonographic airway assessemt
Time Frame: preoperative just before induction of anesthesia
By using superficial ultrasound probe, we measure in millimeters: anterior neck skin to hyoid bone distance, anterior neck skin to vocal cord distance (ANS-VC) ,distance from the epiglottis to the midpoint of the distance between the vocal cords (E-VC),the depth of pre-epiglottic space (Pre-E) and Pre-E/E-VC ratio). All parameters will be measured in millimeters in all groups by the same doctor, and the same ultrasound device.
preoperative just before induction of anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of laryngoscopic view
Time Frame: preoperative just before endotracheal intubation
In all groups, we assess laryngoscopic view of airway using Cormack-Lehane classification system. Grade 1: Full view of the glottis (entire vocal cords and anterior commissure visible); intubation is straightforward. Grade 2: Partial glottic view; subdivided into 2a (posterior vocal cords visible) and 2b (only arytenoids seen); intubation often possible with manipulation. Grade 3: Only epiglottis visible, no glottis; intubation typically requires advanced techniques. Grade 4: Epiglottis not visible; predicts failed intubation, needing alternatives.
preoperative just before endotracheal intubation
Tongue thickness
Time Frame: Once just before induction of general anesthesia
By using deep ultrasound probe, we measure tongue thickness
Once just before induction of general anesthesia
Hyoid bone visibility
Time Frame: Preoperative just before induction of anesthesia
By using deep ultrasound probe, we measure hyoid bone visibility(HBV)
Preoperative just before induction of anesthesia

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Airway Assessment

Subscribe