British Columbia Prescriber Feedback Program - Antimicrobial Resistance

February 17, 2026 updated by: Colin Dormuth, University of British Columbia

Building a National Framework to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance in Primary Care (CANBuild-AMR): Study Protocol for an Impact Evaluation of the British Columbia Prescriber Feedback Program

The goal of this study is to evaluate an educational intervention that aims to reduce the number of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed by family physicians and nurse practitioners in British Columbia, Canada.

The intervention materials include a confidential personalized prescribing "portrait" and an evidence-based educational summary (therapeutics letter), accompanied by an introduction letter.

The main research questions are:

  1. Will the intervention lead to a reduction in the overall number of antibiotics prescriptions started?
  2. Will the intervention lead to a reduction in the proportion of antibiotics prescribed that are likely unnecessary, especially prescriptions for upper respiratory tract infections, acute bronchitis, acute sinusitis?

Researchers will conduct an intervention study with family physicians and nurse practitioners in British Columbia, Canada. Participant clinicians will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The Early Group will consist of 80% of the participants and will receive the intervention (prescribing portrait, evidence summary, and introduction letter) at the start of the study. The Delayed Group will consist of 20% of participants and will receive the intervention about nine months later. This study design allows most practitioners to receive the intervention early while still allowing time to compare the two groups to assess the impact. To estimate the impact of the intervention, researchers will use administrative health data to compare the prescribing of the Early Group with prescribing of the Delayed Group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Audit and feedback is a well-established strategy for improving the quality of care in primary healthcare settings. It involves the systematic collection and analysis of healthcare data, followed by the provision of information to healthcare providers to improve the quality of care.

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global health problem, fueled in part by unnecessary antibiotic use. Most antibiotics are prescribed in the community, especially for respiratory infections, and many of these prescriptions provide little or no benefit, particularly for viral illnesses. Effective antimicrobial stewardship in primary care is essential.

Based in British Columbia, Canada, the Therapeutics Initiative's Portrait program provides family physicians and nurse practitioners with individualized prescribing data compared with their peers, paired with evidence-based messaging, and a concise statement summarizing the desired change in prescribing behavior. The Portrait program implements a series of pragmatic trials to improve prescribing where clinicians are randomized into an early intervention and a delayed control group.

The current study evaluates the impact of an antibiotic prescribing portrait and evidence summary focused on reducing overall antibiotic use and avoiding routine prescribing for common respiratory tract infections (upper respiratory tract infections, acute bronchitis, acute sinusitis) in primary care. The prescribing portrait title is "What are your antibiotic prescribing rates?" and is accompanied by a therapeutics letter (evidence summary) entitled "Avoid antibiotics for self-limited viral infections" and an introduction letter.

The portrait contains two key recommendations based on recent systematic reviews on the effect of antibiotic prescribing on antimicrobial resistance in primary care: 1) Reduce the number of your patient visits that end with an antibiotic prescription, and 2) Avoid routinely prescribing antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections, acute bronchitis, and acute sinusitis. The first recommendation is accompanied by a bar graph showing the prescriber their number of antibiotic prescriptions per 100 patients in 2024 in comparison with the median practice in BC and an achievable target. The second recommendation is accompanied by a bar graph showing the prescriber's percentage of antibiotic prescriptions identified as likely unnecessary in 2024 in comparison with the median practice in BC and an achievable target.

The prescribing portrait data were generated using linked administrative health claims data from the BC Ministry of Health. Data access is provided according to the Information Sharing Agreement with the BC Ministry of Health (ISA 16-036). To maintain data security, data will be accessed via the Ministry of Health's Secure Analysis Environment, and include:

  • BC Medical Services Plan (MSP) physician services data
  • Hospital separations from the Discharge Abstracts Database (DAD)
  • BC PharmaNet data (prescription drugs dispensed at community pharmacies)
  • Client Roster (client demographic data)
  • Practitioner Roster (practitioner demographic data)

7,626 physicians and nurse practitioners in British Columbia were randomized in an 80:20 ratio, with 80% assigned to receive the intervention materials early and 20% assigned to a delayed control group (6,100 intervention; 1,526 control). Clinicians in the early group will be mailed the intervention at study initiation (February 2026), while those in the delayed group will be mailed the same materials after an approximate 9-month delay. Study group assignment will be conducted using a random number generator by an independent analyst. Researchers selected this unequal allocation to facilitate earlier dissemination of the intervention to a larger proportion of clinicians while maintaining a control group for estimation of the intervention effect.

Researchers will use a modified intention-to-treat approach for all analyses, with clinicians analyzed based on their randomized assignment to early or delayed receipt of the prescribing portrait. Clinicians who opt out will be excluded from analysis. Intervention effects will be estimated using Poisson regression to estimate rates, rate differences and rate ratios for the outcome, with the delayed group serving as a contemporaneous control group to account for secular changes in prescribing.

The primary outcome is the weekly rate of new (incident) antibiotic prescriptions per practitioner. A prescription is considered "new" if the patient has not received an antibiotic from the same prescriber in the previous 30 days. Repeat prescriptions within an ongoing course of care are excluded.

Secondary outcomes are: 1) the weekly rate of likely unnecessary incident antibiotic prescriptions per practitioner, and 2) the weekly rate of likely unnecessary, condition-specific incident antibiotic prescriptions per practitioner for upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), acute bronchitis, and acute sinusitis.

Researchers will summarize baseline clinician characteristics by study group using descriptive statistics. To evaluate the durability of the intervention effect, researchers will assess primary and secondary outcomes at 1, 3, and 6 months, as well as over the full delay period (approximately 9 months).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

7626

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 1Z3
        • Therapeutics Initiative - Dept of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Colin Dormuth, ScD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Practitioner Inclusion Criteria:

Registered in 2024 with the BC Medical Services Plan (MSP) with:

  • A valid MSP billing number;
  • Status of Salaried, Private Practice, Temporary Licence, or Post Graduate;
  • Prescribed >100 dispensed medications in 2024.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously opted out of the Therapeutics Initiative Portrait program

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years at time of oral antibiotic dispensation;
  • Received PharmaCare benefits through the Palliative Care program at any time during the baseline or study period;
  • Hospitalized within 1 week prior to an antibiotic prescription at any time during the baseline or study period;
  • On chronic suppressive antibiotic therapy (≥90 days' supply of any antibiotic dispensed) during the baseline or study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early Group - Prescribing portrait audit and feedback
The Early Group of clinicians (n=6100) will be mailed the prescribing portrait audit-and-feedback intervention (prescribing portrait, evidence summary, and introduction letter) at the study initiation in February 2026.
The prescribing portrait audit-and-feedback intervention consists of a confidential, personalized prescribing audit-and-feedback report (Portrait), an evidence-based educational summary (therapeutics letter), and an introduction letter. The prescribing portrait uses linked BC Ministry of Health administrative claims data and presents two key recommendations: (1) reduce the proportion of patient visits resulting in an antibiotic prescription, and (2) avoid routinely prescribing antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections, acute bronchitis, and acute sinusitis. Each recommendation is accompanied by a bar graph showing the prescriber's 2024 performance compared with the median prescriber in British Columbia and an achievable target. The intervention will be delivered using a secure paper mailing process. During every aspect of production and delivery, prescribing data are confidential and protected.
Experimental: Delayed control - Prescribing portrait audit-and-feedback
Delayed control group (n=1526) of clinicians will be mailed the audit-and-feedback intervention (prescribing portrait, evidence summary, and introduction letter) approximately 9 months after Group 1 (Early Group).
The prescribing portrait audit-and-feedback intervention consists of a confidential, personalized prescribing audit-and-feedback report (Portrait), an evidence-based educational summary (therapeutics letter), and an introduction letter. The prescribing portrait uses linked BC Ministry of Health administrative claims data and presents two key recommendations: (1) reduce the proportion of patient visits resulting in an antibiotic prescription, and (2) avoid routinely prescribing antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections, acute bronchitis, and acute sinusitis. Each recommendation is accompanied by a bar graph showing the prescriber's 2024 performance compared with the median prescriber in British Columbia and an achievable target. The intervention will be delivered using a secure paper mailing process. During every aspect of production and delivery, prescribing data are confidential and protected.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weekly rate of incident oral antibiotic prescribing
Time Frame: From trial initiation to 30 days, 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention
The primary outcome is the number of incident oral antibiotic prescriptions per practitioner per week. Follow-up time will be calculated for each practitioner in the 52 weeks before and 39 weeks after the portrait is mailed to the Early group. A practitioner will count as contributing a full week (7 days) of follow-up if, during that week, they either: 1) wrote at least one prescription (recorded in PharmaNet), or 2) billed the Medical Services Plan for at least one patient visit. Weekly prescribing rates will be plotted by Early and Delayed groups and analyzed using Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations to account for repeated measures. Models will adjust for cohort (Early vs. Delay), age, sex, rural practice, and provider type. The intervention effect will be estimated using a pre-post level-change variable and its interaction with cohort status, representing the adjusted mean impact of the portrait.
From trial initiation to 30 days, 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weekly rate of 'likely unnecessary' antibiotic prescriptions
Time Frame: From trial initiation to 30 days, 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention
Weekly rate of 'likely unnecessary' incident oral antibiotic prescribing per practitioner. An antibiotic prescription is defined as 'likely unnecessary' if the dispensing occurs within 5 days of a physician visit with a diagnosis where oral antibiotic treatment is 'never appropriate'. The 'achievable target' comparator is defined as the top 25% of physicians with the lowest proportion of likely unnecessary prescriptions. is defined as the top 25% of physicians with the lowest proportion of likely unnecessary prescriptions. Analyses will be conducted and reported using the same methodology as the primary analyses.
From trial initiation to 30 days, 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention
Weekly rate of 'likely unnecessary' condition-specific antibiotic prescriptions
Time Frame: From trial initiation to 30 days, 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention
Weekly rate of 'likely unnecessary' condition-specific incident oral antibiotic prescribing per practitioner for the following conditions: 1) upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), 2) acute bronchitis, 3) acute sinusitis. An antibiotic prescription is defined as 'likely unnecessary' if the dispensing occurs within 5 days of a physician visit with a diagnosis where oral antibiotic treatment is 'never appropriate'. The 'achievable target' comparator is defined as the top 25% of physicians with the lowest proportion of likely unnecessary prescriptions. Analyses will be conducted and reported using the same methodology as the primary analyses.
From trial initiation to 30 days, 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Colin Dormuth, ScD, University of British Columbia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 17, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The study team's data access does not permit sharing of IPD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality Improvement

Clinical Trials on Prescribing portrait audit and feedback

Subscribe