- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07433361
Family STEPS: Family Check-Up+ (FamilySTEPS)
CHAMPP4KIDS: Family STEPS: Tailored, Stepped Prevention Strategy Using the Family Check-Up+
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Andrea Gonzalez, PhD
- Phone Number: 9055101652
- Email: gonzal@mcmaster.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S3K1
- McMaster University
-
Contact:
- Andrea Gonzalez, PhD
- Phone Number: 905-510-1652
- Email: gonzal@mcmaster.ca
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Custodial caregiver of child is aged 2 to 6 years at time of screening.
- Families with sufficient knowledge of English needed for assessment measures.
- Caregivers capable of giving informed, written consent.
- Definition of 'at-risk' as measured by (a) or (b)as outlined below:
parental mental health problems, as indexed by a score of ≥ 13 on the K6 distress scale or; (b) Meeting pre-determined criteria for higher risk, for example, a family may be eligible for FCU if any one or more of the following are present based on the Family Needs Assessment : i) child behaviour or school-related concerns; ii) parenting difficulty or low parenting confidence; iii) Substance use causing family-level problems; or iv) three or more social or material stressors affecting parenting
Exclusion Criteria:
- Families with in sufficient knowledge of English, Families with caregivers incapable of giving informed written consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Family Check Up +
Caregivers randomized to this arm (n=1500) will receive the Family Check-Up Program
|
The FCU is a brief, strengths-based and evidenced informed intervention designed to support positive parenting and child and family well-being.
Phase 1 of FCU an initial interview, an assessment, and a feedback session.
Motivation interviewing is incorporated into all three components.
During the feedback session the providers and caregivers work together to create a list of resources based on the needs identified by the families.
Providers will work to connect the families to the identified resources, so they are not left to navigate the complex systems alone.
Additionally, families will then have the option of completing phase 2, Everyday Parenting.
The EDP curriculum manual presents session outlines and materials organized into three skill areas: (1) supporting positive behavior, (2) setting healthy limits, and (3) building family relationships.
The number of EDP sessions is flexible, enabling the clinician to tailor the EDP to unique family needs.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual
Caregivers randomized to this arm (n=150) will receive either a different program, or brief services
|
The FCU is a brief, strengths-based and evidenced informed intervention designed to support positive parenting and child and family well-being.
Phase 1 of FCU an initial interview, an assessment, and a feedback session.
Motivation interviewing is incorporated into all three components.
During the feedback session the providers and caregivers work together to create a list of resources based on the needs identified by the families.
Providers will work to connect the families to the identified resources, so they are not left to navigate the complex systems alone.
Additionally, families will then have the option of completing phase 2, Everyday Parenting.
The EDP curriculum manual presents session outlines and materials organized into three skill areas: (1) supporting positive behavior, (2) setting healthy limits, and (3) building family relationships.
The number of EDP sessions is flexible, enabling the clinician to tailor the EDP to unique family needs.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: During recruitment - pre-randomization
|
Description: As part of the reach assessment of the RE-AIM domain, We will assess the extent to which the target population is reached in FCU. Recruitment will be assessed as the proportion of eligible families who consent and enroll in the study following screening for FCU+ eligibility. Unit of Measure: Proportion (%) of eligible families enrolled. Recruitment will be interpreted using a traffic-light approach (green = feasible; amber = feasible with modification; red = not feasible without substantial redesign), which is commonly used in pilot trials to support transparent decision-making regarding progression. Recruitment feasibility will be assessed based on the proportion of eligible families who consent and enroll:
Data Source: Study screening logs and REDCap enrollment records |
During recruitment - pre-randomization
|
|
Fidelity to FCU Delivery
Time Frame: During Intervention- on average 3-5 weeks
|
Description: Fidelity to FCU delivery within routine services will be assessed for the core FCU components (initial interview, assessment, and feedback) using the COACH observational rating system. Sessions will be securely video-recorded and coded by trained raters. Unit of Measure: Mean COACH fidelity score and proportion (%) of sessions meeting predefined fidelity thresholds. The COACH assesses five dimensions of observable in-session coordinator skills: conceptual accuracy; responsiveness to family context and needs; active session structuring; effective teaching and corrective feedback; and generation of hope and motivation. Each dimension includes exemplars and non-exemplars and is rated on a 9-point scale reflecting competent adherence to the program (1-3 = needs work; 4-6 = competent work; 7-9 = excellent work), with higher scores indicating stronger mastery of FCU principles Data Source: Coded video-recorded sessions and fidelity rating forms |
During Intervention- on average 3-5 weeks
|
|
Retention
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-randomization
|
Description: Retention will be assessed as the proportion of randomized participants who complete follow-up assessments at each scheduled time point. Retention performance will be interpreted using a traffic-light approach (green = feasible; amber = feasible with modification; red = not feasible without substantial redesign). Retention feasibility will be assessed based on completion of follow-up assessments:
Data Source: REDCap follow-up records |
3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-randomization
|
|
Completion of Core FCU Components
Time Frame: During Intervention - on average 3-5 weeks
|
Description: Within the intervention arm, uptake of core FCU components will be assessed by completion of the assessment and feedback sessions. Unit of Measure: Proportion (%) of intervention participants completing core FCU components using means, medians, and relevant quantiles. Data Source: Structured intervention delivery logs |
During Intervention - on average 3-5 weeks
|
|
Engagement in Everyday Parenting (EDP) Sessions
Time Frame: During Intervention- on average 6 sessions
|
Description: Among participants for whom parenting support is indicated, engagement will be assessed by participation in at least one EDP session. Unit of Measure: Proportion (%) of indicated participants attending EDP sessions using means, medians, and relevant quantiles. Data Source: Intervention delivery logs |
During Intervention- on average 6 sessions
|
|
Receipt of Navigation and Linkage Activities
Time Frame: During Intervention- Up to 1 year
|
Description: Among participants for whom service navigation is indicated, uptake will be assessed by receipt of navigation and linkage activities. Unit of Measure: Proportion (%) of indicated participants receiving navigation services Data Source: Intervention delivery logs |
During Intervention- Up to 1 year
|
|
Dose of FCU Services Delivered
Time Frame: During entire study period- up to 12 months
|
Description: Dose of FCU delivery within routine services will be assessed using routine service records documenting completion of FCU components, parenting support sessions, and navigation and linkage activities, when indicated. Unit of Measure: Number and proportion (%) of completed FCU-related service components Data Source: Routine service records and de-identified monthly provider logs |
During entire study period- up to 12 months
|
|
Timeliness of FCU Delivery
Time Frame: Time of intervention- on average 3-5 weeks
|
Description: Timeliness of FCU delivery within routine services will be assessed as the elapsed time from randomization to completion of the FCU assessment and feedback. Unit of Measure: Time (days) in intervention using means, medians, and relevant quantiles. Data Source: REDCap enrollment records and intervention delivery logs |
Time of intervention- on average 3-5 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Child emotional/behavioural problems
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12 months
|
The investigators will measure change in child emotional and behavioural problems across time points using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The questionnaire consists of 25 questions divided into five scales. The prosocial behaviour scale showcases strengths, while the remaining four evaluate negative behaviours such as emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity and inattention, and peer relationship problem. Add the scores of all the items in the first four subscales (Emotional Symptoms + Conduct Problems + Hyperactivity/Inattention + Peer Relationship Problems). The Total Difficulties Score represents the overall level of emotional and behavioral difficulties. Scoring: total score can range from 0-50 cut offs: 0 to 12: Close to Average 13 to 15: Slightly Raised 16 to 18: High 19 and above: Very High |
Baseline, 6-months, 12 months
|
|
Parenting Practices
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
|
Discipline style measured using the Parenting Scale.
The 25-item questionnaire has each item rated on a 7-point scale, measures three stable factors of dysfunctional discipline.
Scores for each question range from 1-7 with a total score ranging from 25-175.
Higher scores indicate dysfunctional parenting.
|
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andrea Gonzalez, PhD, McMaster University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19754
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Child Behavior Problem
-
University of PittsburghThe Grable Foundation; The Shear Family Foundation; Heinz EndowmentsActive, not recruitingParenting | Child Development | Child Behavior Problem | Parent Child Abuse | Child LanguageUnited States
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS); AltaMed Health...TerminatedParenting | Child Behavior Problem | Child RearingUnited States
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaPNC FoundationTerminatedChild Behavior | Child Development | Child Behavior ProblemUnited States
-
University of ChicagoNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingChild Behavior Problem | Mental Health | Child Externalizing ProblemsAzerbaijan
-
Sykehuset TelemarkEnrolling by invitationChild Behavior Problem | Psychiatric Problem | DDP | Child Neglect | MaltreatmentNorway
-
University of MinnesotaRecruiting
-
University of OxfordUniversity of Cape Town; Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit; Bureau... and other collaboratorsCompletedParent-Child Relations | Parenting | Child Behavior Problem | Depression, Anxiety | Domestic Violence | Parent Child Abuse | Parent-child Problem | Child NeglectThailand
-
Karolinska InstitutetRegion StockholmActive, not recruitingParent-Child Relations | Parenting | Child Behavior Problem | Adult ADHDSweden
-
Ateneo de Manila UniversityUniversity of Oxford; University of Cape Town; Philippines Department of Social... and other collaboratorsCompletedParent-Child Relations | Parenting | Child Behavior Problem | Child MaltreatmentPhilippines
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)RecruitingChild Behavior | Child Behavior Problem | Child Behavior DisordersUnited States
Clinical Trials on Family Check Up
-
University of OregonNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Recruiting
-
Brown UniversityCompletedSubstance UseUnited States
-
University of OregonActive, not recruitingDepression | Parent-Child Relations | Parenting | Self-regulation | Problem Behavior in School | School AdjustmentUnited States
-
University of OregonCase Western Reserve UniversityCompletedDepression | Parent-Child Relations | Parenting | Self-regulationUnited States
-
RTI InternationalUniversity of PittsburghCompletedSubstance UseUnited States
-
McMaster UniversityUniversity of Calgary; Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation; Arizona State University and other collaboratorsCompletedBehavior Problems | Emotional ProblemsCanada
-
University of OregonNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedDepression | Stress | Anxiety | Parent-Child Relations | Parenting | Substance Use Disorders | Pediatrics | Parenting Self-efficacyUnited States
-
University of OregonCompletedThe Positive Family Support Project - Partnering With Families for a Successful Transition to SchoolAchievementUnited States
-
Arizona State UniversityArizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemActive, not recruiting
-
McMaster UniversityHamilton Health Sciences CorporationCompletedAutism Spectrum Disorder | Behavior Problem | Emotional ProblemCanada