Family STEPS: Family Check-Up+ (FamilySTEPS)

February 19, 2026 updated by: Andrea Gonzalez (for Nathan), McMaster University

CHAMPP4KIDS: Family STEPS: Tailored, Stepped Prevention Strategy Using the Family Check-Up+

Interventions that promote safe, stable, and nurturing relationships between caregivers and children are key to improving healthy family relationships, reducing child socioemotional and behaviour problems, and preventing child maltreatment. Although a broad range of parenting programs are currently implemented in communities across Ontario, most programs are inadequately evaluated, or else not evaluated at all using a pilot pragmatic Hybrid Type II individually randomized controlled trial conducted within routine service settings. The trial will enroll 300 families in Ontario, Canada. The evaluation is informed by the RE-AIM framework, with a primary emphasis on Reach and Implementation and secondary examination of Effectiveness, consistent with the objectives of a Hybrid Type II design.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The overall goal of the evaluation is to assess the extent to which the target population is reached and retained in FCU+ within routine service settings. Reach will be evaluated through recruitment rates (the proportion of eligible families who consent and enroll), retention (the proportion of randomized participants completing follow-up assessments), and family-level uptake of FCU+ intervention components. Second, we aim to provide robust evidence about the implementation and effectiveness of the Family Check-Up program, in the province of Ontario, on parenting practices and functioning, and child emotional behaviour problems outcomes. The investigators will conduct a ua pilot pragmatic Hybrid Type II individually randomized controlled trial conducted within routine service settings with 300 participating caregivers to compare the Family Check-Up (FCU) to treatment as usual (TAU) . Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two conditions using stratified (by site) block randomization. All participants will undergo screening and a baseline assessment before randomization. Once randomized, the FCU participants will begin their sessions and the TAU participants will receive a different program, or short therapy sessions. Caregivers will complete a baseline research assessment and follow-up assessments at 6- and 12-months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S3K1
        • McMaster University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Custodial caregiver of child is aged 2 to 6 years at time of screening.
  • Families with sufficient knowledge of English needed for assessment measures.
  • Caregivers capable of giving informed, written consent.
  • Definition of 'at-risk' as measured by (a) or (b)as outlined below:

parental mental health problems, as indexed by a score of ≥ 13 on the K6 distress scale or; (b) Meeting pre-determined criteria for higher risk, for example, a family may be eligible for FCU if any one or more of the following are present based on the Family Needs Assessment : i) child behaviour or school-related concerns; ii) parenting difficulty or low parenting confidence; iii) Substance use causing family-level problems; or iv) three or more social or material stressors affecting parenting

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Families with in sufficient knowledge of English, Families with caregivers incapable of giving informed written consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Family Check Up +
Caregivers randomized to this arm (n=1500) will receive the Family Check-Up Program
The FCU is a brief, strengths-based and evidenced informed intervention designed to support positive parenting and child and family well-being. Phase 1 of FCU an initial interview, an assessment, and a feedback session. Motivation interviewing is incorporated into all three components. During the feedback session the providers and caregivers work together to create a list of resources based on the needs identified by the families. Providers will work to connect the families to the identified resources, so they are not left to navigate the complex systems alone. Additionally, families will then have the option of completing phase 2, Everyday Parenting. The EDP curriculum manual presents session outlines and materials organized into three skill areas: (1) supporting positive behavior, (2) setting healthy limits, and (3) building family relationships. The number of EDP sessions is flexible, enabling the clinician to tailor the EDP to unique family needs.
Other Names:
  • FCU
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual
Caregivers randomized to this arm (n=150) will receive either a different program, or brief services
The FCU is a brief, strengths-based and evidenced informed intervention designed to support positive parenting and child and family well-being. Phase 1 of FCU an initial interview, an assessment, and a feedback session. Motivation interviewing is incorporated into all three components. During the feedback session the providers and caregivers work together to create a list of resources based on the needs identified by the families. Providers will work to connect the families to the identified resources, so they are not left to navigate the complex systems alone. Additionally, families will then have the option of completing phase 2, Everyday Parenting. The EDP curriculum manual presents session outlines and materials organized into three skill areas: (1) supporting positive behavior, (2) setting healthy limits, and (3) building family relationships. The number of EDP sessions is flexible, enabling the clinician to tailor the EDP to unique family needs.
Other Names:
  • FCU

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: During recruitment - pre-randomization

Description: As part of the reach assessment of the RE-AIM domain, We will assess the extent to which the target population is reached in FCU. Recruitment will be assessed as the proportion of eligible families who consent and enroll in the study following screening for FCU+ eligibility.

Unit of Measure: Proportion (%) of eligible families enrolled. Recruitment will be interpreted using a traffic-light approach (green = feasible; amber = feasible with modification; red = not feasible without substantial redesign), which is commonly used in pilot trials to support transparent decision-making regarding progression.

Recruitment feasibility will be assessed based on the proportion of eligible families who consent and enroll:

  • Green: ≥60% of eligible families approached enroll
  • Amber: 40-59% enroll
  • Red: <40% enroll

Data Source: Study screening logs and REDCap enrollment records

During recruitment - pre-randomization
Fidelity to FCU Delivery
Time Frame: During Intervention- on average 3-5 weeks

Description: Fidelity to FCU delivery within routine services will be assessed for the core FCU components (initial interview, assessment, and feedback) using the COACH observational rating system. Sessions will be securely video-recorded and coded by trained raters.

Unit of Measure: Mean COACH fidelity score and proportion (%) of sessions meeting predefined fidelity thresholds. The COACH assesses five dimensions of observable in-session coordinator skills: conceptual accuracy; responsiveness to family context and needs; active session structuring; effective teaching and corrective feedback; and generation of hope and motivation. Each dimension includes exemplars and non-exemplars and is rated on a 9-point scale reflecting competent adherence to the program (1-3 = needs work; 4-6 = competent work; 7-9 = excellent work), with higher scores indicating stronger mastery of FCU principles

Data Source: Coded video-recorded sessions and fidelity rating forms

During Intervention- on average 3-5 weeks
Retention
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-randomization

Description: Retention will be assessed as the proportion of randomized participants who complete follow-up assessments at each scheduled time point.

Retention performance will be interpreted using a traffic-light approach (green = feasible; amber = feasible with modification; red = not feasible without substantial redesign). Retention feasibility will be assessed based on completion of follow-up assessments:

  • Main follow-ups (6 and 12 months):

    • Green: ≥80% retained at 6 months and ≥75% retained at 12 months
    • Amber: 70-79% retained at 6 months and/or 65-74% retained at 12 months
    • Red: <70% retained at 6 months or <65% retained at 12 months
  • Short follow-ups (3 and 9 months):

    • Green: ≥75% completion
    • Amber: 65-74% completion
    • Red: <65% completion retained at 12 months:
  • Green: ≥75% provide complete parenting and child outcome measures
  • Amber: 65-74% complete data
  • Red: <65% complete data

Data Source: REDCap follow-up records

3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-randomization
Completion of Core FCU Components
Time Frame: During Intervention - on average 3-5 weeks

Description: Within the intervention arm, uptake of core FCU components will be assessed by completion of the assessment and feedback sessions.

Unit of Measure: Proportion (%) of intervention participants completing core FCU components using means, medians, and relevant quantiles.

Data Source: Structured intervention delivery logs

During Intervention - on average 3-5 weeks
Engagement in Everyday Parenting (EDP) Sessions
Time Frame: During Intervention- on average 6 sessions

Description: Among participants for whom parenting support is indicated, engagement will be assessed by participation in at least one EDP session.

Unit of Measure: Proportion (%) of indicated participants attending EDP sessions using means, medians, and relevant quantiles.

Data Source: Intervention delivery logs

During Intervention- on average 6 sessions
Receipt of Navigation and Linkage Activities
Time Frame: During Intervention- Up to 1 year

Description: Among participants for whom service navigation is indicated, uptake will be assessed by receipt of navigation and linkage activities.

Unit of Measure: Proportion (%) of indicated participants receiving navigation services

Data Source: Intervention delivery logs

During Intervention- Up to 1 year
Dose of FCU Services Delivered
Time Frame: During entire study period- up to 12 months

Description: Dose of FCU delivery within routine services will be assessed using routine service records documenting completion of FCU components, parenting support sessions, and navigation and linkage activities, when indicated.

Unit of Measure: Number and proportion (%) of completed FCU-related service components

Data Source: Routine service records and de-identified monthly provider logs

During entire study period- up to 12 months
Timeliness of FCU Delivery
Time Frame: Time of intervention- on average 3-5 weeks

Description: Timeliness of FCU delivery within routine services will be assessed as the elapsed time from randomization to completion of the FCU assessment and feedback.

Unit of Measure: Time (days) in intervention using means, medians, and relevant quantiles.

Data Source: REDCap enrollment records and intervention delivery logs

Time of intervention- on average 3-5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child emotional/behavioural problems
Time Frame: Baseline, 6-months, 12 months

The investigators will measure change in child emotional and behavioural problems across time points using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The questionnaire consists of 25 questions divided into five scales. The prosocial behaviour scale showcases strengths, while the remaining four evaluate negative behaviours such as emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity and inattention, and peer relationship problem.

Add the scores of all the items in the first four subscales (Emotional Symptoms + Conduct Problems + Hyperactivity/Inattention + Peer Relationship Problems). The Total Difficulties Score represents the overall level of emotional and behavioral difficulties.

Scoring: total score can range from 0-50 cut offs: 0 to 12: Close to Average 13 to 15: Slightly Raised 16 to 18: High 19 and above: Very High

Baseline, 6-months, 12 months
Parenting Practices
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Discipline style measured using the Parenting Scale. The 25-item questionnaire has each item rated on a 7-point scale, measures three stable factors of dysfunctional discipline. Scores for each question range from 1-7 with a total score ranging from 25-175. Higher scores indicate dysfunctional parenting.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Gonzalez, PhD, McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19754

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Behavior Problem

Clinical Trials on Family Check Up

Subscribe