The Pittsburgh Study Early Childhood (TPS-ECC)

July 14, 2023 updated by: Daniel Shaw, University of Pittsburgh

The Pittsburgh Study Early Childhood Collaborative

The Early Childhood Collaborative of The Pittsburgh Study is a community-partnered, county-wide implementation of programs for children and families from birth through formal school entry to address real-world challenges that exist in providing effective preventive interventions for families with young children, particularly low-income families.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Early Childhood Collaborative of The Pittsburgh Study is a community-partnered, county-wide implementation of programs for children and families from birth through formal school entry to address real-world challenges that exist in providing effective preventive interventions for families with young children, particularly low-income families. Specifically, The Early Childhood Collaborative seeks to increase engagement (uptake and retention) in evidence-based interventions by (1) initially assessing families' resources and challenges, (2) offering families a menu of intervention options tailored to their resources/needs, and (3) providing these services at multiple locations to optimize accessibility. The Early Childhood Collaborative involves population-level utilization of multiple platforms that families, particularly families at greater risk for health disparities, typically use, including health care (birthing hospitals, pediatric care, federally qualified health centers), Women, Infants, and Children nutritional clinics, and family centers. The Early Childhood Collaborative will locate services in these platforms and at family's homes. The Early Childhood Collaborative focuses on child thriving and flourishing as key outcomes of interest, and community strengths as key drivers of change. To promote sustainability, investigators include representatives from the Departments of Human Services and Health who are responsible for funding and implementing home visiting programs in the greater Pittsburgh community, with the goal of generating infrastructures and capacity in existing community agencies for providing evidence-based behavioral health care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

24000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15222
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15208
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Primary Care Health Services
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Primary Care Centers
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Magee Women's Hospital
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15221
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Allegheny County Family Centers

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Allegheny County Residency, legal custodian of child

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Higher resources/lower challenges
Participants are assigned to this arm based on results of a brief screen; self-reports indicated that they did not posses any measured risk factors. Participants are provided with a choice of the following preventive interventions: Text4Baby/Bright by Text (depending on child age), Nurture Program, and/or Family Centers.
Passive texting programs where participants receive free text messages on topics such as child development and parenting tips three times per week. Text4Baby serves parents of children under one year. Bright by Text serves parents of children under eight years of age.
Nurture Program is a nonprofit organization that promotes healthy development in young children by pairing moms with experienced and knowledgeable mentors who use text messaging to answer questions and provide helpful information, while offering support and encouragement throughout the child's first few years of life.
There are 27 Family Centers across Allegheny County provide services to families of young children 5 and under. These centers focus on three primary activities: 1. enhancing child development; 2. facilitating parent education, and 3. ensuring parents are supported and connected.
Experimental: Lower Resources/Lower Challenges
Participants are assigned to this arm based on results of a brief screen; self-reports indicated that they were low-income, a teen parent, their newborn had health challenges (more than five weeks premature or a neonatal intensive care unit stay of longer than 4 weeks, or they reported mild parenting challenges. They did not endorse any more serious measured risk factors. Participants are provided with a choice of the following preventive interventions: Nurture Program and/or Video Interaction Project.
Nurture Program is a nonprofit organization that promotes healthy development in young children by pairing moms with experienced and knowledgeable mentors who use text messaging to answer questions and provide helpful information, while offering support and encouragement throughout the child's first few years of life.
The Video Interaction Project is a program to support parents and their young children. Video Interaction Project is typically offered at a convenient location, such as a pediatric clinic. Parents are observed and videotaped for 3 to 5 minutes while interaction with their child. The Video Interaction Project coach then watches the video with the parent and talks about their interaction, highlighting how best to support the child's growth and language development.
Experimental: Moderate Challenges
Participants are assigned to this arm based on results of a brief screen; self-reports indicated that they had a history of mental health problems, low social support, or moderate parenting challenges. They did not endorse any more serious measured risk factors. Participants are provided with a choice of the following preventive interventions: Nurture Program and/or Video Interaction Project.
The Video Interaction Project is a program to support parents and their young children. Video Interaction Project is typically offered at a convenient location, such as a pediatric clinic. Parents are observed and videotaped for 3 to 5 minutes while interaction with their child. The Video Interaction Project coach then watches the video with the parent and talks about their interaction, highlighting how best to support the child's growth and language development.
The Family Check-Up is brief, taking place over the course of three sessions, each about an hour long. A Family Check-Up family coach will spend time getting to know the family during an "Initial Interview." Second, parents complete questionnaires that assess child and family adjustment, relationships, and other areas that influence children and families. The assessment includes videotaped family interaction tasks, where parents take part in activities with their child like playing together with toys and puzzles. Third, the Feedback session consists of sharing feedback - including strengths and challenges - about child and family well-being based on survey responses and video clips. Parents are invited to set goals for their family to support and maintain strengths and address areas of concern. Parents are paid 25 dollars after the Feedback Session. Parents have the option to continue meeting with the family coach to support the child's development and improve parental well-being.
Experimental: Serious Challenges
Participants are assigned to this arm based on results of a brief screen; self-reports indicated that they had a histories of involvement with child welfare, incarceration, opioid use disorder, recent homelessness, or that their child is displaying serious behavior problems. Participants are provided with a choice of the following preventive interventions: Smart Beginnings, Family Check-Up or if the child was less than two weeks old, Healthy Families America.
The Family Check-Up is brief, taking place over the course of three sessions, each about an hour long. A Family Check-Up family coach will spend time getting to know the family during an "Initial Interview." Second, parents complete questionnaires that assess child and family adjustment, relationships, and other areas that influence children and families. The assessment includes videotaped family interaction tasks, where parents take part in activities with their child like playing together with toys and puzzles. Third, the Feedback session consists of sharing feedback - including strengths and challenges - about child and family well-being based on survey responses and video clips. Parents are invited to set goals for their family to support and maintain strengths and address areas of concern. Parents are paid 25 dollars after the Feedback Session. Parents have the option to continue meeting with the family coach to support the child's development and improve parental well-being.
Smart Beginnings consists of delivering both Video Interaction Project and the Family Check-up packed together as a single intensive intervention.
As part of Healthy Families America, professionally trained Nurse Home Visitors provide information during weekly home visits so that parents can provide the best for your new baby. Topics addressed are ways to keep the baby safe, how to take care of the baby, and activities parents can enjoy with their babies.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child inhibitory control
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in inhibitory control as measured using the 13-item Inhibitory Control scale of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire. Mean scores will be calculated with a possible range of 0-7 (higher scores indicate greater inhibitory control).

Citation: Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., Hershey, K. L. & Fisher, P. (2001). Investigations of temperament at 3-7 years: The Children's Behavior Questionnaire. Child Development, 72(5), 1394-1408.

4 years
Parent Reading Behaviors - Infancy
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in parent reading behaviors as measured using the StimQ self-report. We will use the 15-item reading factor. Scores used for outcome will be determined by our collaborator (and scale developer) Dr. Alan Mendelsohn and his research team at NYU.

Citations:

StimQ2-Infant©2016. NYU School of Medicine Alan L. Mendelsohn MD, Carolyn B. Cates PhD, Matthew Johnson, PhD, Adriana Weisleder PhD, Benard Dreyer MD

4 years
Socioemotional adjustment - ITSEA
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in infant and toddler problem behaviors and socioemotional adjustment: Measured by the The infant-toddler social and emotional assessment (ITSEA). We will use the 14-item negative emotionality factor. Items are measured on a 3-point likert-type scale. A sum score will be calculated, with a possible range of 0-28 (higher scores indicate greater problems).

Citations: Carter, A. S., Briggs-Gowan, M. J., Jones, S. M., & Little, T. D. (2003). The infant-toddler social and emotional assessment (ITSEA): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 31(5), 495-514.

4 years
Socioemotional adjustment - BITSEA
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in infant and toddler problem behaviors: Measured by a subset of 28 items derived from the Brief infant-toddler social and emotional assessment (BITSEA) Total Problems scale. Items are measured on a 3-point likert-type scale. A sum score will be calculated, with a possible range of 0-56 (higher scores indicate greater problems).

Citation: Briggs-Gowan, M. J. & Carter, A.S. (2006). BITSEA : Brief infant-toddler social and emotional assessment. San Antonio, TX: Pearson 2006.

4 years
Socioemotional adjustment - CBCL
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in child problem behaviors and socioemotional adjustment: Measured by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). We will use 60 items that comprise the Externalizing and Internalizing broadband factors. Items are measured on a 3-point Likert-type scale. A raw sum score will be calculated for each factor, with a possible range of 0-48 for Externalizing problems and 0-72 for Internalizing problems (higher scores indicate greater problems). We will also calculate t-scores for both scales.

Citation: Achenbach, T. M. (2009). The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA): Development, Findings, Theory, and Applications. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.

4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive parenting skills - PYB
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in proactive and positive parenting strategies for parents of infants as measured by Parenting Your Baby (adapted from the Parenting Young Children measure cited below). The measure is comprised of an 8-item positive/supportive parenting score and a 5 item proactive parenting score. Mean scores will be calculated with a possible range of 1-7. Higher scores indicated positive parenting skills.

Citation: McEachern, A.D., Dishion T.D., Weaver, C.M., Shaw, D.S., Wilson, M N. & Gardner, F. (2011). Parenting Young Children (PARYC): Validation of a self-report parenting measure. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1-14.

4 years
Positive parenting skills - PYT
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in proactive and positive parenting strategies for parents of toddlers as measured by Parenting Your Toddler (adapted from the Parenting Young Children measure cited below). The measure is comprised of a 7-item positive/supportive parenting score, a 7-item proactive parenting score, and 7-items limit setting score. Mean scores will be calculated with a possible range of 1-7. Higher scores indicate positive parenting skills.

Parenting Young Children. Citation: McEachern, A.D., Dishion T.D., Weaver, C.M., Shaw, D.S., Wilson, M N. & Gardner, F. (2011). Parenting Young Children (PARYC): Validation of a self-report parenting measure. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1-14.

4 years
Positive parenting skills - PARYC
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in proactive and positive parenting strategies as measured by Parenting Young Children. The measure is comprised of a 7-item positive/supportive parenting score, a 7-item proactive parenting score, and 7-items limit setting score. Mean scores will be calculated with a possible range of 1-7. Higher scores indicate positive parenting skills.

Citation: McEachern, A.D., Dishion T.D., Weaver, C.M., Shaw, D.S., Wilson, M N. & Gardner, F. (2011). Parenting Young Children (PARYC): Validation of a self-report parenting measure. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1-14.

4 years
Harsh parenting
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in harsh parenting strategies as measured by the 5-item Harsh Parenting Scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert-type scale. A sum score will be calculated, with a possible range of 5-30. Higher scores indicate harsher parenting.

Citation: Socolar, R. R. S. & Stein, R. E. K. (1995). Spanking Infants and Toddlers: Maternal Belief and Practice. Pediatrics, 95, 105-111.

4 years
Parent depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in depressive symptoms as measured by the 20-item Centers for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D). Items are measured on a 4-point Likert-type scale. A sum score will be calculated, with a possible range of 0-60. Higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms. Note this measure has a clinical cut-off of 16 meaning that scores greater than or equal to 16 indicate clinically significant levels of depression.

Citation: Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385-401.

4 years
Parent anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in parent anxiety symptoms as measured by the GAD-7. Items are measured on a 4-point Likert-type scale. A sum score will be calculated, with a possible range of 0-21. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety symptoms.

Citation: Spitzer, R.L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J.B.W., Lowe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder. Archives of Internal Medicine,166,1092-1097.

4 years
Parent social support
Time Frame: 4 years

Change in social support as measured by the 3-item social support subscale of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert-type scale. A sum score will be calculated, with a possible range of 3-15. Higher scores indicate greater social support.

Citation: Su, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). The development and validation of Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. Published online before print. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12027

4 years
Well-child care
Time Frame: 4 years
Change in well-child pediatric visits and receipt of immunizations. Measured by medical records released by the participant.
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Elizabeth Miller, MD, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY19060235

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified IPD will be made public after the trial.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified data will be made public at the conclusion of the study. The data will be available indefinitely.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be available to anyone who wishes to access the data for any type of analysis.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parenting

Clinical Trials on Text4Baby or Bright by Text Referral

3
Subscribe