McKenzie and William Exercises in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

February 23, 2026 updated by: Riphah International University

Comparative Effects of Mckenzie and William Exercises on Pain, Disability and Quality of Life in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

The study was conducted to compare the effects of McKenzie Exercises with William exercises for pain, disability and quality of life in patients with sacroiliac joint pain

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 54000
        • Fatima Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both male and female age between 20 and 50 years
  • Patients with sacroiliac joint pain(PSIS) typically present to the buttocks
  • Pain on numeric pain rating scale ranges between 4-8
  • Three out of five tests are positive according to Leslett's criteria from following tests; "distraction test", "FABER Test", Compression Test, "Thigh Thrust test","Gaenslen's test"

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with lumber stenosis and radiculopathy was excluded.
  • Patient diagnosed of spondylolisthesis and ankylosing spondylitis was not included in the study.
  • Pregnant and lactating females was excluded
  • Rheumatoid arthritis, hip fractures.
  • History of any prior orthopedic surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: McKenzie Therapy

Prone on Elbows: The patient was lie on their stomach with their elbows positioned under the shoulders, allowing them to rest on their forearms. This position hold for 15 seconds, with the patient instructed to take deep breaths and relax. This exercise repeated 10 times to enhance spinal extension and relieve pressure.

Prone Press-Ups: In this exercise, the patient was prone line and hands placed under shoulders. They gradually straighten their elbows, lifting the upper body within a pain-free range. Each press-up was held for 15 seconds and repeated 10 times, aiming to promote spinal extension and alleviate pain.

Extension in Standing: The patient was stand in a balanced position and lean backward as far as possible, allowing their head to tip back, then return to a neutral stance. This extension was held for 15 seconds and repeated 10 times, with the goal of improving lumbar mobility and centralizing pain.

Three sessions per week were continued for 8 weeks.

Mulligan Mobilization: For Mulligan mobilization, the patient assumed a prone position. A posterior-to-anterior glide was applied to the sacroiliac joint in three sets of 10 repetitions. The patient was instructed to extend the leg simultaneously with the glide, helping to realign the joint and reduce discomfort by promoting proper joint movement.

Hot Therapy: Heat therapy was administered to the lower back and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) area for 10 minutes to improve blood flow, reduce stiffness, and prepare tissues for further interventions.

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): TENS was applied as an analgesic modality. In the prone position, the patient underwent TENS therapy for 20 minutes at a frequency of 20-50 Hz. Two electrodes placed on the primary painful area, while the other two was be positioned along the path of the radiating nerve to help reduce pain and promote muscle relaxation.

Active Comparator: William Exercises

Mulligan Mobilization: For Mulligan mobilization, the patient assumed a prone position. A posterior-to-anterior glide was applied to the sacroiliac joint in three sets of 10 repetitions. The patient was instructed to extend the leg simultaneously with the glide, helping to realign the joint and reduce discomfort by promoting proper joint movement.

Hot Therapy: Heat therapy was administered to the lower back and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) area for 10 minutes to improve blood flow, reduce stiffness, and prepare tissues for further interventions.

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): TENS was applied as an analgesic modality. In the prone position, the patient underwent TENS therapy for 20 minutes at a frequency of 20-50 Hz. Two electrodes placed on the primary painful area, while the other two was be positioned along the path of the radiating nerve to help reduce pain and promote muscle relaxation.

William exercises was performed to strengthen up the abdominal and gluteal musculature in an effort to manage the sacroiliac joint pain. In this pelvic tilt exercise, Single knee to Chest exercise, Double knee to Chest exercises and hamstring stretching was performed 3 sets of each exercise with hold for 8 to 10 sec and 10 repetitions each set was performed for three times a week. This was continued for 8 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
NPRS is a simple tool which is used to assess intensity of pain. Patients have to rate their pain level on NPRS scale from 0 to 10. It provides a quick, quantifiable measure of pain, aiding healthcare providers in monitoring treatment efficacy and adjusting interventions accordingly.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
ODI is a widely known as questionnaire designed to measure the level of disability in patients with lower back pain. Comprising 10 sections, each focusing on daily activities such as pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, traveling, and employment, the ODI assesses the impact of pain on functional abilities. Each section is scored from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Summing the scores provides a percentage-based measure of disability, ranging from minimal to severe. The ODI is instrumental in clinical practice for evaluating treatment effectiveness and monitoring patient progress over time.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Short form-36 for Quality of Life (SF-36)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
SF-36 is a 36-question survey that looks at health-related quality of life in eight areas: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical and mental health, pain in the body, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, health. SF-36 is a common tool used in research and clinical settings to measure how diseases affect people, how treatments help people, and how well people are overall. It shows many different aspects of a patient's quality of life. Get a clear picture of both your physical and mental health by scoring each domain. This is useful for both initial tests and keeping an eye on changes in health over time.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Humera Mubashar, Ms-OMPT, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC/RCR & AHS/24/01111

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on McKenzie Exercises

Subscribe