Mckenzie Versus William Exercise for Non Specific Low Back Pain in Adolescents

October 14, 2022 updated by: Hesham Hany Mohamed Mahmoued Elmahdy, Cairo University

A Randomaized ,Double Study ,Aims to Compare Between Mckenzie and William's Exercises in Order to Find Which Method Has Better Effect on Adolescents With Non Specific Low Back Pain

MCKENZIE EXERCISE VERSUS WILLIAMS EXERCISE ON DECREASING PAIN IN ADOLESCENT WITH NON SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN

Low back pain is uncommon in the first decade of life,but prevalence increases steeply during the teenage years; around 40% of 9-18-year olds in high-income, medium-income, and low-income countries report having had low back pain. NSLBP represents about 85% of LBP patients seen in primary care. Non-specific low back pain is one of the most common health problems and is the leading cause of disability in young adults. During school age, the overall risk of low back pain is similar to adults, with prevalence rates as high as 70% to 80% by the age of 20 years old Non-specific low back pain is defined as low back pain not attributable to a recognisable, known specific pathology.

Understanding back pain in adolescents is crucial to obtain timely diagnosis and determine appropriate treatment. Proper treatment and management of LBP in the adolescent years can minimize back pain lasting into adulthood Non pharmacological treatments are emphasised over pharmacological interventions in the management of persistent non-specific low back pain.

natinal institute for health and care excellence(NICE) 2016 draft guideline endorses self-management, exercise, manual therapy, psychological therapies, combined physical and psychological programmes, return-to-work programmes, and radiofrequency denervation.

Back exercises can be an inexpensive and easy option of treatment for NSLBP and proven to be effective. McKenzie extension exercise and William flexion exercise are the most common types of back exercises.

Selection the appropriate treatment method is important. So this study will be aimed to compare between Mckenzie and William's exercises in order to find which method has better effect on adolescents with NSLBP.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age range from 14 to 18 years.
  • Diagnosed as non-specific low back pain.
  • Medically and clinically stable.
  • All participants are within normal range weight and height.

Exclusion Criteria:

Adolescents have one or more of the followings will be excluded:

  • Any spinal deformities.
  • History of spinal or pelvic surgery.
  • Specific spinal pathologies as cauda equina syndrome, cord compression, infection, fracture, neoplasm, inflammatory disease, whiplash associated disorders and vertebro-basilar insufficiency.
  • Any visual or auditory problems that interfere with the rehabilitation program.
  • Children with significant mental or psychological problems that interfere with understanding instructions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Mckenzie group
  • adolescents will receive 4 weeks Mckenzie exercise program
  • Follow-up:pre-test (Baseline), 2 weeks post-test and 4 weeks post-test.
McKenzie method is popular amongst physiotherapists as a management approach for spinal pain and McKenzie exercises for LBP are beneficial treatment for increasing flexibility of spine and improving the pain with better results in pain relief
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: William's group
  • adolescents will receive 4 weeks William's exercise program
  • Follow-up:pre-test (Baseline), 2 weeks post-test and 4 weeks post-test.
William flexion exercise is to reduce pain or soreness and provide lower trunk stability by actively developing the abdominal muscles,gluteus maximus and hamstring, passively stretching the hip flexors and lower back muscles(sacro spinalis) and to restore or improve the work balance between the postural flexor and extensor muscle groups

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: changes in pain at 4 weeks
This will be used to determine the intensity of pain.The VAS is a valid and reliable measure of chronic pain intensity . It is the amount of pain that a patient feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Operationally, a VAS is usually a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end The patient will mark on the line at the point that he feels which represents his perception of the current state.The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimeters from the left hand end of the line to the point that the child marks .
changes in pain at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ModifiedSchober's Test(MSchober test)
Time Frame: changes in back flexibility in 4 weeks

The mSchober test is frequently used method for assessing lumbar flexion range of motion (ROM).

Test will be done as follows:

  • The participant will stand in neutral erect position without shoes.
  • The assessor will marks 1 point 5 cm below and 1 point 10 cm above the lumbosacral junction(dimples of Venus), that is, 15 cm in upright position.
  • The participant will be asked to make 2 attempts to bend forward as far as possible, the first will be a trial attempt, and the assessor measured the distance between the marks on the second attempt
  • The increase in distance between the marks was then calculated as the measure of lumbar flexion ROM.
  • In general, the measure should increase by at least 6 cm to 21 cm. An increase of less than 6 cm suggests decreased lumbar spinal mobility.
changes in back flexibility in 4 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
YMED TEST Balance Test
Time Frame: changes in balance in 4 weeks

This smart phone application was developed by Physio tools YMED; a group from the kwangju Health College, South Korea. It allows the performance of several tests: vestibular balance test, sitting balance test, knee balance test and board balance test .

Vestibular and board balance tests will be used as the following:

• Vestibular balance test: Smart phone device will be fixed on the patient's back by strap and he will be asked firstly to keep standing with open eyes for 10 seconds and therapist click start button then to keep standing with closed eyes for 10 seconds and wait for report of test.

• Board balance test: Patient will be asked to stand on a balance board and fix the smart phone on the board and the patient will be asked to stand steady as much as can for 10 seconds then print the reports.

changes in balance in 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

October 10, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 30, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/003327

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non Specific Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on MCKENZIE exercises

3
Subscribe