- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07439003
Behavioral Risk Identification and Decision Guidance for HIV Engagement (BRIDGE)
Behavioral Risk Identification and Decision Guidance for Engagement
Despite much progress towards reaching UNAIDS goals for HIV treatment, disengagement from care remains one of the biggest obstacles to HIV elimination. In many African countries, including South Africa, the early treatment period (first six months after starting or re-starting antiretroviral therapy (ART)) is the interval with the highest risk of treatment interruption and disengagement, but until recently, this period had received relatively little attention from researchers and policy makers. The Retain6 project was launched in 2021 to generate data about the early treatment period, propose potential improvements to guidelines and models of care, and conduct preliminary tests of some potential interventions. Since then, Retain6 has collected detailed data about, among other topics:
- Patient-level preferences, barriers, and facilitators of care during the first six months to help predict interruption risks and develop relevant interventions (PREFER survey, protocol M220440 (Wits HREC), H-42726 (BU IRB)
- Predictors of risks of treatment interruption during the early treatment period and characteristics of patients most likely to experience interruptions, with an improved risk assessment approach for use at primary clinic level (PREDICT model, protocol M210472)
- Interventions currently available at primary healthcare clinics to improve engagement in care, to match interventions to risks
- Current facility compliance with South Africa's 2023 HIV treatment guidelines (FIRST-HIV, protocol 250409)
- Provider views of retention in care and potential ways to improve it, to understand facility barriers to implementing guidelines (FIRST-HIV, protocol 250409)
- Effectiveness of tracing interventions following an interruption, to optimize tracing procedures once disengagement occurs (GREAT-South Africa, protocol M2409113).
Under the proposed BRIDGE (Behavioral Risk Identification and Decision Guidance for Engagement) protocol, the investigators aim to synthesize the data listed above to create and test a client retention toolkit comprising a package of targeted, light-touch interventions that aim to improve outcomes during the early treatment period. The retention toolkit is expected to include:
- An updated adherence risk/vulnerability assessment tool for use by clients and providers during consultations to identify clients vulnerable to disengagement from care
- A "menu" of available interventions that can be matched to identified vulnerability factors for disengagement and allow patients to choose what they believe will be most effective for them
- A "treatment roadmap" to help new and re-starting ART patients understand and adhere to treatment schedules
- A WhatsApp based tool, AI Coach, developed by external colleagues to provide confidential and empathetic support and information after treatment initiation.
- An improved process for identifying patients eligible for tracing and monitoring tracing results.
- A co-designed, user-friendly checklist/job aid to support providers in adhering to the 2023 ART guidelines during early treatment.
This package is currently being co-designed with key stakeholders, including the National Department of Health, and is intended to be implemented within the existing systems and require minimal additional resources. On completion of the co-design process, the investigators will conduct a pilot assessment of the retention toolkit to describe acceptability, feasibility, uptake, and preliminary impact on near-term outcomes (attendance at next scheduled visit) at a selected set of primary healthcare clinics in South Africa. The study procedures will combine secondary analysis of de-identified medical record data and qualitative data collection among patients and providers. Data collection will take place during the first half of 2026, with a waiver of consent requested for medical record data and written informed consent for qualitative data collection. The maximum total sample size for the medical record data will be 30,000 patients and for the qualitative data collection will be 180 patients and 90 providers.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Linda Sande
- Phone Number: 27 63 115 1952
- Email: lsande@heroza.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Mhairi Maskew
- Phone Number: 27 82 330 9216
- Email: mmaskew@heroza.org
Study Locations
-
-
Gauteng
-
Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
- Recruiting
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office
-
Contact:
- Jacqui Miot
- Phone Number: 27 83 616 0008
- Email: jmiot@heroza.org
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Nyasha Mutanda
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Group 1:
- ≥18 years old at treatment initiation or re-initiation
- Initiating ART (newly or re-engaging after a period of interruption) or currently receiving ART at one of the participating study sites.
Group 2:
- Seeking care at an intervention site during their early treatment period
- Reachable at telephone (mobile) number provided
- Consented to participate in qualitative data collection
Group 3:
- Employed by DOH or an implementing partner at a study site
- Trained and participated in delivering the intervention
- Consented to participate in qualitative data collection
Exclusion Criteria:
No exclusion criteria for any group.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ART clients seeking care at study sites
Adult clients initiating ART (newly or re-engaging after a period of interruption) or currently receiving ART at one of the participating study sites
|
The proposed retention toolkit to be tested in this study has six components, all of which are intended to be low-cost, light-touch changes to standard of care that are designed to help patients overcome barriers to retention in the early treatment period; can be implemented by existing public sector clinic staff with existing resources; and can be evaluated using a combination of routinely collected medical record data and qualitative surveys. The toolkit will be implemented at facility level, such that all clients seeking relevant services will be exposed to it during the pilot period. The toolkit's components are:
The toolkit will be implemented by facility staff as part of routine care during a pilot program; the study will evaluate its implementation and outcomes. |
|
ART clients exposed to intervention
Adult ART clients who were exposed to the intervention during a routine clinic visit
|
The proposed retention toolkit to be tested in this study has six components, all of which are intended to be low-cost, light-touch changes to standard of care that are designed to help patients overcome barriers to retention in the early treatment period; can be implemented by existing public sector clinic staff with existing resources; and can be evaluated using a combination of routinely collected medical record data and qualitative surveys. The toolkit will be implemented at facility level, such that all clients seeking relevant services will be exposed to it during the pilot period. The toolkit's components are:
The toolkit will be implemented by facility staff as part of routine care during a pilot program; the study will evaluate its implementation and outcomes. |
|
Providers exposed to the intervention
Healthcare service providers at implementation facilities who participated in implementing the intervention
|
The proposed retention toolkit to be tested in this study has six components, all of which are intended to be low-cost, light-touch changes to standard of care that are designed to help patients overcome barriers to retention in the early treatment period; can be implemented by existing public sector clinic staff with existing resources; and can be evaluated using a combination of routinely collected medical record data and qualitative surveys. The toolkit will be implemented at facility level, such that all clients seeking relevant services will be exposed to it during the pilot period. The toolkit's components are:
The toolkit will be implemented by facility staff as part of routine care during a pilot program; the study will evaluate its implementation and outcomes. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visit attendance
Time Frame: 1-6 months following exposure to retention toolkit
|
Attendance at the next visit scheduled to occur after the visit at which participant was exposed to the retention toolkit
|
1-6 months following exposure to retention toolkit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sydney Rosen, Boston University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- H-46408
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV
-
Duke UniversityGilead SciencesRecruitingHIV Prevention | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis | HIV Prevention Program | HIV Prevention and Care | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis UseUnited States
-
Federal University of São PauloGilead SciencesCompleted
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamMobile County Health Deparment; Alabama Department of Public HealthRecruitingHIV | HIV Testing | HIV Linkage to Care | HIV TreatmentUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingPrEP | HIV | HIV Prevention | PrEP UptakeUnited States
-
Institute of HIV Research and Innovation Foundation...National Institutes of Health (NIH)RecruitingHIV Prevention | PrEP Adherence | HIV Related StigmaThailand
-
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and...Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS FoundationCompletedPartner HIV Testing | Couple HIV Counseling | Couple Communication | HIV IncidenceCameroon, Dominican Republic, Georgia, India
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingFeasibility | HIV Prevention | PrEP Uptake | Acceptability | HIV Self-testing | Male Partners of HIV-negative Postpartum WomenSouth Africa
-
ANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesHopital Universitaire Robert-Debre; Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement and other collaboratorsUnknownHIV | HIV-uninfected Children | Children Exposed to HIVCameroon
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnHIV Infections | HIV/AIDS | Hiv | AIDS | Aids/Hiv Problem | AIDS and InfectionsUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); University of BotswanaRecruitingPregnancy | HIV | Post-partum | HIV Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) AdherenceBotswana
Clinical Trials on Retention toolkit to improve HIV treatment outcomes during the early treatment period
-
National University, RwandaUniversity of Pittsburgh; Brown University; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other collaboratorsUnknownClinical Decision Support System | HIV/AIDS and Infections | Electronic Medical RecordsRwanda
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterPfizer; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; University of Pittsburgh; University of VirginiaCompletedNeurofibromatosis | Meningioma | CNS Cancer | Hemangioblastoma | Intracranial HemangiopericytomaUnited States