OPTIMUM Study of Remote Patient Monitoring in Ambulatory Heart Failure Care (OPTIMUM)

February 24, 2026 updated by: Médipôle Lyon-Villeurbanne

OPTIMUM: OPTIMisation du Parcours de Soins du Patient Insuffisant Cardiaque Chronique

Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalization and readmission, particularly among older adults with multiple comorbidities. Traditional outpatient follow-up may be insufficient to detect early clinical deterioration in this vulnerable population. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) using non-invasive symptom and weight tracking has been proposed to enhance ambulatory care, but its effectiveness appears to depend on integration within structured care pathways.

The OPTIMUM study evaluated the real-world implementation of an integrated ambulatory heart failure care pathway combining non-invasive RPM with multidisciplinary follow-up in routine clinical practice. Patients enrolled after a recent heart failure hospitalization were managed using the Satelia® Cardio monitoring system, nurse-led therapeutic education, and a planned cardio-geriatric day-hospital reassessment. The study aimed to describe pathway implementation and assess associations with rehospitalizations, mortality, alert activity, and patient and healthcare professional satisfaction in an older, frail population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of hospitalization and rehospitalization among older adults and represents a substantial burden for healthcare systems. Many readmissions occur after discharge for acute heart failure (AHF), often related to delayed recognition of worsening symptoms. While non-invasive remote patient monitoring (RPM) has been proposed as a strategy to extend surveillance into the home setting, previous studies suggest that monitoring alone may be insufficient without integration into structured, multidisciplinary care.

OPTIMUM was a prospective, single-center, observational cohort study designed to evaluate the implementation of a structured ambulatory HF care pathway incorporating non-invasive RPM in routine clinical practice. The study was conducted at Médipôle Hôpital Mutualiste in Lyon, France. Adult patients with a recent hospitalization for acute heart failure, or with a history of AHF hospitalization within the prior 12 months, were enrolled into the OPTIMUM care pathway and followed prospectively.

The care pathway combined several coordinated components:

  • Remote patient monitoring (RPM): Patients were monitored using Satelia® Cardio, a non-invasive RPM system based on symptom questionnaires and body-weight measurements. A clinical algorithm generated color-coded alerts (green, orange, red) reflecting estimated risk of decompensation. Alerts were reviewed by healthcare professionals to guide clinical response.
  • Nurse-led therapeutic education: Structured telephone-based education focused on symptom recognition, treatment adherence, diet, fluid management, and self-care behaviors.
  • Cardio-geriatric day-hospital reassessment: A planned multidisciplinary outpatient visit approximately one month after inclusion included cardiology and geriatric evaluation, echocardiography, functional assessment, physiotherapy input, nutritional evaluation, and social support assessment when needed.

Patients were managed according to routine clinical practice, and no experimental interventions were introduced. The study used a pre-post design comparing outcomes during the 12 months before enrollment with those during the 12 months after enrollment in the pathway. The primary outcome was the number of cardiac rehospitalizations. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalizations, mortality up to two years, frequency and distribution of RPM alerts, and patient and healthcare professional satisfaction. Health-related quality of life and frailty measures were also collected descriptively.

OPTIMUM aimed to provide real-world evidence on how RPM can be operationalized within an integrated ambulatory HF care model, particularly in an older, frail population often underrepresented in clinical trials.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

504

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
      • Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France, 69100
        • Medipole Hopital Mutualiste

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consisted of adults with heart failure managed in routine clinical practice at a tertiary care center in Lyon, France. Most participants were enrolled following a recent hospitalization for acute heart failure, while a smaller proportion were included after outpatient evaluation with a history of heart-failure hospitalization within the prior 12 months. The population was predominantly older and medically complex, with a high burden of comorbidities, polypharmacy, and functional vulnerability. Many participants met criteria for frailty and had limitations that could affect self-management, such as mobility impairment, sensory deficits, or cognitive difficulties. Despite this, the majority were living at home at the time of enrollment, often with support from caregivers or community services.This cohort reflects a real-world ambulatory heart failure population at high risk of rehospitalization and functional decline, representative of older patients commonly encoun

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of heart failure
  • Hospitalization for acute heart failure or a cardiac cause OR outpatient evaluation with a history of heart-failure hospitalization within the previous 12 months
  • Enrollment into the OPTIMUM ambulatory heart failure care pathway
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Agreement to participate in remote patient monitoring

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Refusal to participate in remote patient monitoring or the OPTIMUM care pathway
  • Physical, cognitive, or psychological limitations incompatible with use of the remote monitoring system
  • Treating clinician judged that adherence to telemonitoring would be insufficient
  • Presence of a non-cardiac comorbidity associated with an estimated life expectancy of less than 12 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Integrated Ambulatory Heart Failure Care Pathway
Patients with a recent hospitalization for acute heart failure (or prior hospitalization within 12 months) who were enrolled in a structured ambulatory care pathway in routine clinical practice. The pathway included non-invasive remote patient monitoring, nurse-led therapeutic education, and a planned multidisciplinary cardio-geriatric outpatient reassessment.
A non-invasive remote patient monitoring system based on regular patient-reported symptom questionnaires and body weight measurements. A built-in algorithm generates color-coded alerts (green, orange, red) to support early detection of potential heart failure decompensation. Alerts are reviewed by healthcare professionals as part of routine care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Cardiac Rehospitalizations
Time Frame: 1 year before enrollment and 1 year after enrollment
Total number of hospital admissions with a primary cardiac diagnosis (ICD-10 codes I50.x) occurring during the 12 months following enrollment in the ambulatory care pathway, compared descriptively with the 12 months preceding enrollment.
1 year before enrollment and 1 year after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-Cause Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 1 year before enrollment and 1 year after enrollment
Total number of hospital admissions for any cause during the 12 months following enrollment compared with the 12 months preceding enrollment.
1 year before enrollment and 1 year after enrollment
All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after enrollment
Death from any cause among enrolled participants
Up to 24 months after enrollment
Cardiovascular Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after enrollment
Death attributed to cardiovascular causes based on clinical records.
Up to 24 months after enrollment
Remote Patient Monitoring Alert Activity
Time Frame: 1 year
Frequency and distribution of color-coded alerts (green, orange, red) generated by the Satelia® Cardio remote monitoring algorithm during follow-up.
1 year
Patient and Healthcare Professional Satisfaction with the Care Pathway
Time Frame: At the end of follow up or the study period
Self-reported satisfaction and healthcare professional satisfaction with integrated ambulatory care pathway measured using a 10-point Likert scale questionnaire
At the end of follow up or the study period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mehdi Aleyan, MD, Department of Cardiology, Médipôle Hôpital Mutualiste

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because the dataset contains sensitive health information from a small, single-center cohort, which could increase the risk of participant re-identification despite de-identification procedures.

Data were collected as part of routine clinical care and are subject to French and European data protection regulations (GDPR). Aggregated results are reported in study publications.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Satelia® Cardio Remote Patient Monitoring System

Subscribe