- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07439081
OPTIMUM Study of Remote Patient Monitoring in Ambulatory Heart Failure Care (OPTIMUM)
OPTIMUM: OPTIMisation du Parcours de Soins du Patient Insuffisant Cardiaque Chronique
Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalization and readmission, particularly among older adults with multiple comorbidities. Traditional outpatient follow-up may be insufficient to detect early clinical deterioration in this vulnerable population. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) using non-invasive symptom and weight tracking has been proposed to enhance ambulatory care, but its effectiveness appears to depend on integration within structured care pathways.
The OPTIMUM study evaluated the real-world implementation of an integrated ambulatory heart failure care pathway combining non-invasive RPM with multidisciplinary follow-up in routine clinical practice. Patients enrolled after a recent heart failure hospitalization were managed using the Satelia® Cardio monitoring system, nurse-led therapeutic education, and a planned cardio-geriatric day-hospital reassessment. The study aimed to describe pathway implementation and assess associations with rehospitalizations, mortality, alert activity, and patient and healthcare professional satisfaction in an older, frail population.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of hospitalization and rehospitalization among older adults and represents a substantial burden for healthcare systems. Many readmissions occur after discharge for acute heart failure (AHF), often related to delayed recognition of worsening symptoms. While non-invasive remote patient monitoring (RPM) has been proposed as a strategy to extend surveillance into the home setting, previous studies suggest that monitoring alone may be insufficient without integration into structured, multidisciplinary care.
OPTIMUM was a prospective, single-center, observational cohort study designed to evaluate the implementation of a structured ambulatory HF care pathway incorporating non-invasive RPM in routine clinical practice. The study was conducted at Médipôle Hôpital Mutualiste in Lyon, France. Adult patients with a recent hospitalization for acute heart failure, or with a history of AHF hospitalization within the prior 12 months, were enrolled into the OPTIMUM care pathway and followed prospectively.
The care pathway combined several coordinated components:
- Remote patient monitoring (RPM): Patients were monitored using Satelia® Cardio, a non-invasive RPM system based on symptom questionnaires and body-weight measurements. A clinical algorithm generated color-coded alerts (green, orange, red) reflecting estimated risk of decompensation. Alerts were reviewed by healthcare professionals to guide clinical response.
- Nurse-led therapeutic education: Structured telephone-based education focused on symptom recognition, treatment adherence, diet, fluid management, and self-care behaviors.
- Cardio-geriatric day-hospital reassessment: A planned multidisciplinary outpatient visit approximately one month after inclusion included cardiology and geriatric evaluation, echocardiography, functional assessment, physiotherapy input, nutritional evaluation, and social support assessment when needed.
Patients were managed according to routine clinical practice, and no experimental interventions were introduced. The study used a pre-post design comparing outcomes during the 12 months before enrollment with those during the 12 months after enrollment in the pathway. The primary outcome was the number of cardiac rehospitalizations. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalizations, mortality up to two years, frequency and distribution of RPM alerts, and patient and healthcare professional satisfaction. Health-related quality of life and frailty measures were also collected descriptively.
OPTIMUM aimed to provide real-world evidence on how RPM can be operationalized within an integrated ambulatory HF care model, particularly in an older, frail population often underrepresented in clinical trials.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
-
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France, 69100
- Medipole Hopital Mutualiste
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years
- Diagnosis of heart failure
- Hospitalization for acute heart failure or a cardiac cause OR outpatient evaluation with a history of heart-failure hospitalization within the previous 12 months
- Enrollment into the OPTIMUM ambulatory heart failure care pathway
- Ability to provide informed consent
- Agreement to participate in remote patient monitoring
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Refusal to participate in remote patient monitoring or the OPTIMUM care pathway
- Physical, cognitive, or psychological limitations incompatible with use of the remote monitoring system
- Treating clinician judged that adherence to telemonitoring would be insufficient
- Presence of a non-cardiac comorbidity associated with an estimated life expectancy of less than 12 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Integrated Ambulatory Heart Failure Care Pathway
Patients with a recent hospitalization for acute heart failure (or prior hospitalization within 12 months) who were enrolled in a structured ambulatory care pathway in routine clinical practice.
The pathway included non-invasive remote patient monitoring, nurse-led therapeutic education, and a planned multidisciplinary cardio-geriatric outpatient reassessment.
|
A non-invasive remote patient monitoring system based on regular patient-reported symptom questionnaires and body weight measurements.
A built-in algorithm generates color-coded alerts (green, orange, red) to support early detection of potential heart failure decompensation.
Alerts are reviewed by healthcare professionals as part of routine care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Cardiac Rehospitalizations
Time Frame: 1 year before enrollment and 1 year after enrollment
|
Total number of hospital admissions with a primary cardiac diagnosis (ICD-10 codes I50.x) occurring during the 12 months following enrollment in the ambulatory care pathway, compared descriptively with the 12 months preceding enrollment.
|
1 year before enrollment and 1 year after enrollment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
All-Cause Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 1 year before enrollment and 1 year after enrollment
|
Total number of hospital admissions for any cause during the 12 months following enrollment compared with the 12 months preceding enrollment.
|
1 year before enrollment and 1 year after enrollment
|
|
All-Cause Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after enrollment
|
Death from any cause among enrolled participants
|
Up to 24 months after enrollment
|
|
Cardiovascular Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after enrollment
|
Death attributed to cardiovascular causes based on clinical records.
|
Up to 24 months after enrollment
|
|
Remote Patient Monitoring Alert Activity
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Frequency and distribution of color-coded alerts (green, orange, red) generated by the Satelia® Cardio remote monitoring algorithm during follow-up.
|
1 year
|
|
Patient and Healthcare Professional Satisfaction with the Care Pathway
Time Frame: At the end of follow up or the study period
|
Self-reported satisfaction and healthcare professional satisfaction with integrated ambulatory care pathway measured using a 10-point Likert scale questionnaire
|
At the end of follow up or the study period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mehdi Aleyan, MD, Department of Cardiology, Médipôle Hôpital Mutualiste
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Pages N, Picard F, Barritault F, Amara W, Lafitte S, Maribas P, Abassade P, Labarre JP, Boulestreau R, Chaouky H, Abdennadher M, Lemieux H, Lasserre R, Bedel C, Betito L, Nisse-Durgeat S, Diebold B. Remote patient monitoring for chronic heart failure in France: When an innovative funding program (ETAPES) meets an innovative solution (Satelia(R) Cardio). Digit Health. 2022 Aug 22;8:20552076221116774. doi: 10.1177/20552076221116774. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
- Jourdain P, Pages N, Amara W, Maribas P, Lafitte S, Lemieux H, Barritault F, Seronde MF, Labarre JP, Chaouky H, Bedel C, Betito L, Nisse-Durgeat S, Picard F. Perceptions and satisfaction of patients with chronic heart failure when using a remote monitoring web application named Satelia(R) Cardio. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2023 Jun;72(3):101606. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2023.101606. Epub 2023 May 25. French.
- Aleyan M, Paradisi-Prieur L, Nisse-Durgeat S, et al. Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie, Volume 72 - Issue 5, November 2023, 101649. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2023.101649
- Girerd N, Barbet V, Seronde MF, Benchimol H, Jagu A, Tartiere JM, Hanon O, Picard F, Lafitte S, Lemaitre M, Pages N, Nisse-Durgeat S, Jourdain P. Association of a remote monitoring programme with all-cause mortality and hospitalizations in patients with heart failure: National-scale, real-world evidence from a 3-year propensity score analysis of the TELESAT-HF study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Sep;27(9):1658-1669. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3563. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- OPTIMUM
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because the dataset contains sensitive health information from a small, single-center cohort, which could increase the risk of participant re-identification despite de-identification procedures.
Data were collected as part of routine clinical care and are subject to French and European data protection regulations (GDPR). Aggregated results are reported in study publications.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Indiana UniversityRecruitingCongestive Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) | Congestive Heart Failure Chronic | Congestive Heart Failure(CHF)United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreRecruitingAcute Decompensated Heart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicPakistan
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
Lakeland Regional Health Systems, Inc.RecruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure Acute | Acute Heart Failure (AHF) | Heart Failure - NYHA II - IVUnited States
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyNot yet recruitingHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, SystolicUnited States, Japan
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
Clinical Trials on Satelia® Cardio Remote Patient Monitoring System
-
SateliaCompletedHeart Failure | Patient Empowerment | Cardiac FailureFrance
-
Northwestern UniversityOmron Healthcare Co., Ltd.Completed
-
University Health Network, TorontoCompleted
-
University of Mississippi Medical CenterHealth Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)Completed
-
University of British ColumbiaCompleted
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedRemote Patient Monitoring on Intensive Care UnitGermany
-
University of California, DavisCompletedType 1 DiabetesUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityNew York Presbyterian Hospital; Philips HealthcareCompleted
-
Tracy Jalbuena MDHealth Resources and Services Administration (HRSA); MaineHealthWithdrawnDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2United States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalWithdrawnGastrointestinal Cancer