- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07441473
Peer-Supported Clinical Orientation Training
The Effect of a Peer-Supported Video- and Interaction-Based Clinical Orientation Program on Reality Shock and Adaptation During the First Clinical Experience
This randomized controlled study will aim to evaluate the effect of a peer-supported video and interaction-based clinical orientation program on reality shock and adaptation during the first clinical experience. The study will be conducted with nursing students who will start their first clinical practice. Participants will be randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention group will receive a peer-led orientation program including videos recorded in real clinical settings by senior students, interactive question-answer sessions, a structured hospital tour, and ongoing digital communication support. The control group will receive the routine clinical orientation.
Data will be collected at two different time points. The first measurement will be performed at the end of the second week of clinical practice to allow students to experience the clinical adaptation process. The second measurement will be conducted four weeks after the first assessment. Reality shock and clinical adaptation levels will be evaluated using valid and reliable scales. This study is expected to provide evidence on the effectiveness of peer-supported and technology-enhanced orientation strategies in facilitating students' adaptation to clinical environments and contribute to the development of innovative practices in nursing education.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This randomized controlled study will aim to evaluate the effect of a peer-supported video and interaction-based clinical orientation program on reality shock and clinical adaptation among nursing students during their first clinical experience. The study will be conducted with first-year nursing students at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Siirt University, in the spring semester of 2026. Students who meet the inclusion criteria will first be stratified according to gender and grade point average (GPA), and then assigned to the intervention and control groups using computer-assisted block randomization. The sample size was calculated using G*Power, and a total of 90 students will be included in the study.
The intervention group will receive a multi-component peer-supported orientation program, including videos recorded in real clinical settings by senior students, interactive question-answer sessions, a structured hospital tour, peer mentor support during the clinical practice process, and continuous guidance through digital communication groups. The control group will receive the routine verbal clinical orientation provided in the institution.
Data will be collected at two time points. The first measurement will be conducted at the end of the second week of clinical practice to allow students to experience the clinical adaptation process. The second measurement will be performed four weeks after the first assessment. Data will be collected using the Introductory Information Form, the Reality Shock Scale for Nursing Students, and the Clinical Adjustment Scale for Student Nurses. In addition, educational satisfaction will be evaluated in both groups using a visual analog scale (VAS). An open-ended feedback form will be administered only to the intervention group to explore students' experiences and perceptions of the program.
The data will be analyzed using SPSS software. Descriptive statistics will be presented, and appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests will be used for group comparisons. Effect sizes will also be calculated. This study is expected to provide evidence on the effectiveness of peer-supported and technology-enhanced clinical preparation programs in reducing reality shock and improving clinical adaptation. The findings may contribute to the development and integration of innovative, student-centered orientation strategies in nursing education.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: MEYREME AKSOY, Associate Professor
- Phone Number: 05065003384
- Email: meyreme.aksoy@siirt.edu.tr
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being a first-year nursing student,
- Participating in clinical practice for the first time,
- Being 18 years of age or older,
- Being a citizen of the Republic of Türkiye and having the ability to read and understand Turkish,
- Providing voluntary informed consent to participate in the stud
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having previous clinical practice, internship, or healthcare-related experience,
- Being under 18 years of age,
- Being a foreign national,
- Refusing to participate or withdrawing from the study,
- Inability to attend the orientation program or the data collection process
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Peer-Supported Video and Interactive Clinical Orientation
Participants in the experimental group will receive a multi-component peer-supported clinical orientation program prior to their first clinical placement.
The intervention will include video-based orientation recorded in real clinical settings by senior nursing students, interactive question-answer sessions, and a structured hospital tour.
In addition, peer mentors will provide on-site guidance during the initial clinical days and ongoing support through a digital communication platform.
The program aims to reduce uncertainty, enhance clinical readiness, and facilitate adaptation to the clinical environment
|
Participants in the experimental group will receive a multi-component peer-supported clinical orientation program prior to their first clinical placement.
The intervention will include video-based orientation recorded in real clinical settings by senior nursing students, interactive question-answer sessions, and a structured hospital tour.
In addition, peer mentors will provide on-site guidance during the initial clinical days and ongoing support through a digital communication platform.
The program aims to reduce uncertainty, enhance clinical readiness, and facilitate adaptation to the clinical environment.
|
|
Active Comparator: Routine Clinical Orientation
Participants in the control group will receive the routine clinical orientation provided by the institution before their first clinical placement.
This orientation will consist of a standard PowerPoint-based educational session covering hospital rules, clinical procedures, student roles and responsibilities, and basic safety and communication principles.
No peer support, video-based education, or additional digital mentoring will be provided to this group.
|
Participants in the control group will receive the routine clinical orientation provided by the institution before their first clinical placement.
This orientation will consist of a standard PowerPoint-based educational session covering hospital rules, clinical procedures, student roles and responsibilities, and basic safety and communication principles.
No peer support, video-based education, or additional digital mentoring will be provided to this group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Reality Shock Scale for Nursing Students
Time Frame: Week 2
|
The Reality Shock Scale for Nursing Students is a 31-item Likert-type instrument developed to evaluate the mismatch experienced by student nurses between their clinical practice and their expectations regarding clinical procedures, communication, role responsibilities, and professional expectations.
Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Higher scores indicate greater levels of reality shock.
The scale consists of four subdimensions: interpersonal relationships in the workplace, perception of professional competence, professional commitment, and role overload with psychosocial outcomes.
The information regarding the scale was obtained from the form provided for the present study.
|
Week 2
|
|
Clinical Adjustment Scale for Student Nurses
Time Frame: Week 2
|
The Clinical Adjustment Scale for Student Nurses (CAS-SN), Turkish version is a 15-item, 5-point Likert-type instrument designed to evaluate the level of clinical adaptation among nursing students.
The scale consists of three subdimensions: professional development and interpersonal interaction, clinical competence and confidence, and coping and support strategies.
The total score ranges from 15 to 75, with higher scores indicating better clinical adaptation to the clinical environment.
The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Turkish version has been reported as 0.918.
Information regarding the content of the scale was obtained from the scale file provided for the present study
|
Week 2
|
|
Satisfaction survey
Time Frame: Week 1
|
The Satisfaction Questionnaire was used to evaluate students' satisfaction with the orientation education using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Students were asked to rate their level of satisfaction on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicated "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicated "extremely satisfied."
The total score ranged from 0 to 10, with higher scores reflecting greater levels of satisfaction.
This questionnaire was used to assess students' overall satisfaction with either the routine or peer-supported orientation methods, as well as their perceived effectiveness in enhancing learning experiences and reinforcing clinical skills.
|
Week 1
|
|
Student Feedback Form
Time Frame: Week 1
|
An open-ended feedback form will be administered to the students in the experimental group who participate in the peer-supported clinical orientation program.
Students will be invited to share their opinions about the aspects of the peer-supported orientation that they found beneficial, the challenges they experienced, and areas they believe could be improved.
This form will be used to explore students' experiences, perceptions, and suggestions regarding the effectiveness of the peer-supported orientation approach.
|
Week 1
|
|
Reality Shock Scale for Nursing Students
Time Frame: Week 6 (follow-up).
|
The Reality Shock Scale for Nursing Students is a 31-item Likert-type instrument developed to evaluate the mismatch experienced by student nurses between their clinical practice and their expectations regarding clinical procedures, communication, role responsibilities, and professional expectations.
Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Higher scores indicate greater levels of reality shock.
The scale consists of four subdimensions: interpersonal relationships in the workplace, perception of professional competence, professional commitment, and role overload with psychosocial outcomes.
The information regarding the scale was obtained from the form provided for the present study.
|
Week 6 (follow-up).
|
|
Clinical Adjustment Scale for Student Nurses
Time Frame: Week 6 (follow-up).
|
The Clinical Adjustment Scale for Student Nurses (CAS-SN), Turkish version is a 15-item, 5-point Likert-type instrument designed to evaluate the level of clinical adaptation among nursing students.
The scale consists of three subdimensions: professional development and interpersonal interaction, clinical competence and confidence, and coping and support strategies.
The total score ranges from 15 to 75, with higher scores indicating better clinical adaptation to the clinical environment.
The total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Turkish version has been reported as 0.918.
Information regarding the content of the scale was obtained from the scale file provided for the present study
|
Week 6 (follow-up).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- McCloughen A, Levy D, Johnson A, Nguyen H, McKenzie H. Nursing students' socialisation to emotion management during early clinical placement experiences: A qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul;29(13-14):2508-2520. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15270. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
- Ma H, Zou JM, Zhong Y, Li J, He JQ. Perceived stress, coping style and burnout of Chinese nursing students in late-stage clinical practice: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Jul;62:103385. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103385. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
- Loureiro F, Pecas D, Neves AC, Antunes AV. Coping strategies and social support in nursing students during clinical practice: A scoping review. Nurs Open. 2024 Feb;11(2):e2112. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2112.
- Lee T, Damiran D, Konlan KD, Ji Y, Yoon YS, Ji H. Factors related to readiness for practice among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 May;69:103614. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103614. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
- Baharum H, Ismail A, McKenna L, Mohamed Z, Ibrahim R, Hassan NH. Success factors in adaptation of newly graduated nurses: a scoping review. BMC Nurs. 2023 Apr 18;22(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01300-1.
- Ciris Yildiz C, Ergun Y. Development and psychometric testing of the Reality Shock Scale for newly graduated nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2021 Dec;77(12):4950-4962. doi: 10.1111/jan.15056. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
- Admi H, Moshe-Eilon Y, Sharon D, Mann M. Nursing students' stress and satisfaction in clinical practice along different stages: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Sep;68:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.027. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
- Acea-Lopez L, Pastor-Bravo MDM, Rubinat-Arnaldo E, Bellon F, Blanco-Blanco J, Gea-Sanchez M, Briones-Vozmediano E. Job expectations and intolerance to uncertainty of nursing students: Results from a multicentre, mixed-methods study in Spain. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Jul;62:103337. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103337. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
- Yildiz CC, Ceylan BK, Ergun Y, Mete M. Development and psychometric testing of the reality shock scale for nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Oct;153:106795. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106795. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
- Liu L,Dallakoti N,Cui W,Li X,Ding S,Zhang S
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 162252
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
University of Vermont Medical CenterAvocado Nutrition CenterRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Volunteer | Healthy Adult | Healthy Volunteers Only | Healthy Male and Female Subjects | Healthy Non-smokersUnited States
-
Dragonfly TherapeuticsRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult Females | Volunteer | Healthy Adult MaleAustralia
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Participants | Static Stretching | Stretch | StretchingItaly
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
Umm Al-Qura UniversityActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult | Healthy Women | Healthy Adult Females | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young Adults | Healthy Adult Female Participants | Healthy Adult Male | Poor Sleep Quality | Healthy (Controls) | Poor Sleeping Quality | Healthy Adult Male Subjects | Health Adult SubjectsSaudi Arabia
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy Participants | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young AdultsItaly
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
PfizerNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy AdultsUnited States
-
Atisama TherapeuticsRecruitingHealthy | Healthy SmokerAustralia
Clinical Trials on Peer-Supported Video and Interactive Clinical Orientation
-
Universidade Federal do ParanáCompletedAdolescent Behavior
-
Ataturk UniversityNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Total Knee Arthroplasty
-
Jewish General HospitalUniversity Health Network, Toronto; McGill University Health Centre/Research... and other collaboratorsCompletedHealth Attitude | Low Anterior Resection Syndrome | Patient Satisfaction | Colo-rectal Cancer | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Patient Empowerment | Peer GroupCanada
-
University of Sao PauloFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Conselho Nacional de...Completed
-
Providence VA Medical CenterRhode Island FoundationCompletedHypertension | Diabetes | Dyslipidemia | Coronary ArteriosclerosisUnited States
-
University of OregonCompleted
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCompletedColorectal CancerUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPhysical ActivityUnited States