"Mulligan Technique vs Phonophoresis With Chitosan for Patellofemoral Pain" ("MTPP")

February 27, 2026 updated by: Mennat Allah Aldesouky, Ahram Canadian University

Mulligan Technique Vs Phonophoresis With Chitosan Gel on Neuromuscular Control in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common knee condition causing pain and dysfunction. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two physical therapy treatments for PFPS: Mulligan mobilization with movement technique versus phonophoresis with chitosan gel.

Forty-five participants with patellofemoral pain syndrome will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) Mulligan technique group, (2) Phonophoresis with chitosan gel group, or (3) Control group receiving standard physical therapy exercises. Each group will receive treatment 3 times per week for 4 weeks.

The researchers want to determine which treatment is more effective in improving neuromuscular control, reducing pain, and improving function in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Participants will be assessed before and after the treatment period.

This study may help physical therapists and healthcare providers choose the most effective treatment approach for patients with patellofemoral pain.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Giza Governorate
      • Cairo, Giza Governorate, Egypt, 12573
        • Ahram Canadian unveracity
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Insidious onset of anterior knee pain
  • Retro patellar or peripatellar pain
  • Pain duration more than four weeks (chronic/subacute)
  • Pain severity ≥ 3/10 on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • Pain during at least two of the following activities: stair ascent or descent, squatting, prolonged sitting (theater sign), or kneeling
  • Positive patellar compression test (pain reproduced by compressing the patella into the trochlear groove)
  • Patellar tenderness along the medial or lateral borders
  • Age between 18 and 35 years
  • Baseline Kujala score (Arabic version): approximately 67-71 (indicating moderate to severe dysfunction)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Traumatic injury (e.g., dislocation, fracture, ligament or meniscus pathology)
  • Inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, gout)
  • Prior knee surgery
  • Current use of NSAIDs or corticosteroids

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mulligan Technique Group
Participants receive hip and knee strengthening exercises combined with Mulligan mobilization with movement (MWM) technique for the patellofemoral joint. MWM is performed in three sets of 10 repetitions, with a 30-second rest interval between sets. Treatment sessions are conducted 3 times per week for 6 weeks.
Each mobilization with movement (MWM) is performed in three sets of 10 repetitions, with a 30-second rest interval between sets, 3 times per week for 6 weeks, before hip and knee strengthening exercises.
Experimental: Phonophoresis with Chitosan Group
Phonophoresis (ultrasound with chitosan gel) is applied at 1 MHz, 1.0 W/cm², continuous mode, for 5 minutes, 3 times per week for 6 weeks before hip and knee exercises.
Phonophoresis (ultrasound with chitosan gel) is applied at 1 MHz, 1.0 W/cm², continuous mode, for 5 minutes, 3 times per week for 6 weeks before hip and knee exercises.
Active Comparator: Control Group ( Standard Physical Therapy Group)
Participants receive standard physical therapy for patellofemoral pain consisting of hip and knee strengthening exercises, stretching, and functional training. Sessions are conducted 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Exercises include hip and knee strengthening exercises and stretches for the quadriceps, hamstring, iliotibial band, and calf muscles with weekly progression.
Participants attend 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks. Each session includes stretching and hip and knee focused exercises. Progression involves weekly increases in repetitions and resistance based on pain levels (less than 3/10).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal rate of force development (RFD)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Calculated from the slope of force- or torque-time curves obtained during rapid, explosive voluntary contractions also termed ballistic or rapid actions has become a key metric for assessing explosive strength in diverse populations, including athletes, older adults, and clinical patients
Baseline and 6 weeks
Pain at patella
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks
Pain measured using the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS). The scale ranges from 0 to 100 points, with 0 indicating maximum disability and 100 indicating no disability. Higher scores indicate better outcome (less pain and better function)
Baseline and 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Mulligan technique

Subscribe