TETANUS Antibody Detection in Saliva Study (TETANUS)

February 25, 2026 updated by: University of Birmingham

Development of Novel Diagnostics That Use Point-of-care Lateral Flow Testing Technology for Non-invasive, Individual Assessment of Antibody Protection to Tetanus and Vaccine Need

This study aims to design, develop and optimise a non-invasive, saliva sample-based point-of-care lateral flow test for use in low and middle income settings that can return a qualitative result on whether an individual has or has not immunity to tetanus within 10-15mins. If successful, this approach would not require blood sampling or laboratory facilities, empower personalised decision making on vaccine needs and support the development of population level data-driven public health policies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The development of non-invasive point-of-care (POC) diagnostic testing for the detection of protective immunity to tetanus would empower LMICs to identify immunity gaps and individuals who are a priority for vaccination and generate sero-epidemiology models for future public health decision around tetanus control. Given tetanus antigen is included as polyvalent vaccine formulations for infants as part of the WHO EPI schedule for LMICS, the absence of anti-tetanus toxoid antibody might also indicate missed vaccine doses that would have conferred protection to other infectious diseases.

This is a cross-sectional, non-interventional, biological sampling study. This study will be conducted at the Center for Family Health Research in Kigali, Rwanda, in collaboration with Rwanda Biomedical Centre, the national health implementation agency for Rwanda, and the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. WHO/UNICEF estimates DTP3 coverage in Rwanda at 97% following extensive SIA activity after vaccination coverage dropped to 88% in 2021. Rwanda hosts a significant number of refugees (135,000 at the end of April 2024), nearly half of these are children and many are from the Democratic Republic of the Congo where only just over half of children are fully immunised.

The overall aim of this study is to assess the real-world performance and the diagnostic clinical accuracy of a novel, saliva-based, point-of-care lateral flow test in determining the immune status to tetanus for individuals in Rwanda.

Participants will be recruited from the following groups:

  • Group A: Healthy children aged 5-10 years (n=250)
  • Group B: Healthy younger adults aged 18-25 years (n=35)
  • Group C: Healthy pregnant women (n=30)
  • Group D: Adults with known immune suppression (see table 1) aged 18-45 years (n=75)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

390

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able and willing to provide informed consent to take part in the study; either directly or from a parent/guardian, where appropriate
  • [Group A] Aged 5-10 years inclusive, and determined as healthy by a member of the study team
  • [Group B] Aged 18-25yrs inclusive, and determined as healthy by a member of the study team
  • [Group C] Currently pregnant at any stage of pregnancy, prior to receipt of a tetanus booster vaccine in pregnancy, and determined as healthy by a member of the study team and safe to provide a blood sample
  • [Group D] Adults aged 18-45 years with one or more of the medical conditions that may affect antibody response to vaccination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants or parents/guardians unwilling or unable to provide informed consent to take part
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with study procedures
  • Have a bleeding disorder deemed significant by study doctor
  • [Groups A, B and C only] Any health condition which, in the opinion of a study physician which could

    1. mean blood sampling has the potential for harm and/or
    2. affect immune response to a vaccine for example known/suspected impairment of immune function (with the exception of Group D)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: All participants
All participants will receive the same interventions.
Measurement of anti-tetanus toxoid antibody concentration in saliva
Measurement of anti-tetanus toxoid antibody concentration in blood

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The clinical diagnostic performance of the saliva-based lateral flow test in determining immune status as compared to bead-based multiplexed assay on serum.
Time Frame: Day 1
Immune status according to the saliva-based lateral flow test. Any pigment on the test line will be interpreted as immune.
Day 1
The clinical diagnostic performance of the saliva-based lateral flow test in determining immune status as compared to bead-based multiplexed assay on serum.
Time Frame: Day 1
Immune status as measured on serum by bead-based multiplex assay. Antibody titres at or above the WHO antibody immune correlate for protection of 0.1 IU/mL will be classed as immune.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perspectives of healthcare workers and the public
Time Frame: Day 1
Perceptions and acceptability of this approach from healthcare workers and members of the public around using a novel salivary point-of-care lateral flow test for tetanus and vaccination decisions. This will be determined by thematic analysis of transcripts from focus groups of 5-15 people who have either been a participant in the study or helped with delivery of the study.
Day 1
Serum anti-tetanus toxoid antibody concentration
Time Frame: Day 1
Serum anti-tetanus toxoid antibody concentration as measured by bead-based multiplex assay.
Day 1
Serum antibody titres to other EPI vaccine antigens
Time Frame: Day 1
Serum antibody titres to diptheria, haemophilus influenzae, hepatitis B and measles as measured by multiplex assay or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Day 1
Vaccination history
Time Frame: Day 1
Vaccination history either by electronic healthcare records, vaccination card or maternal recall.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available to protect the confidentiality of study participants. Fully anonymised data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data requests can be submitted starting immediately after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 5 years. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research and will be provided following review and approval of a methodologically sound research proposal. Data must be required to achieve the aims in the approved proposal. Data requests should be directed to c.a.green.2@bham.ac.uk.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tetanus

Clinical Trials on Point of care, saliva-based lateral flow test

Subscribe