SEED-CRYO: Sequential 125I Seed Implantation Followed by Cryoablation vs Single-Modality Local Therapy in Unresectable Solid Tumors

February 27, 2026 updated by: Li Min

A Randomized Phase II Study of Sequential Iodine-125 Seed Implantation Followed by Cryoablation Versus Iodine-125 Seed Implantation Alone or Cryoablation Alone in Unresectable Solid Tumors

This open-label, randomized Phase II trial evaluates whether sequential iodine-125 seed implantation followed by cryoablation improves local tumor control versus single-modality local therapy (125I seeds alone or cryoablation alone) in unresectable solid tumors.

The study is based on a complementary treatment rationale: cryoablation provides rapid cytoreduction of the dominant tumor component, while 125I seed brachytherapy delivers sustained low-dose-rate irradiation that may better suppress residual viable tumor at the periphery and microscopic extension zones. The trial is designed to determine whether this spatial and temporal complementarity translates into superior local disease control without unacceptable toxicity.

Participants will be randomized in parallel to one of three arms: (1) sequential 125I seed implantation followed by cryoablation within a protocol-defined interval, (2) 125I seed implantation alone, or (3) cryoablation alone. Treatment assignment is open label; imaging-based efficacy endpoints will be assessed using a standard blinded assessment process (blinded evaluators), according to protocol-defined criteria.

The primary endpoint is local control rate (LCR) of prespecified target lesions and progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints are local progression-free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS), early pain response, technical success, target-lesion re-intervention rate, and safety (including grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events, CTCAE v5.0). Exploratory analyses include dosimetry-outcome associations, imaging/radiomics biomarkers, and peripheral blood biomarker dynamics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This open-label, randomized Phase II trial aims to evaluate, in patients with unresectable solid tumors, whether a sequential local treatment strategy-percutaneous image-guided iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation followed by cryoablation within a protocol-specified time window-can achieve superior tumor local control compared with single-modality local therapy (125I seed implantation alone or cryoablation alone), while maintaining acceptable safety, thereby providing methodological support and effect-size estimates for subsequent Phase III confirmatory studies.

The study is based on the "spatial-temporal complementarity" of two local modalities. Cryoablation can rapidly induce cytotoxic tumor destruction and reduce tumor burden; however, residual viable cells may persist in the peripheral infiltrative zone, sub-millimeter microscopic remnants, and low-temperature gradient regions near the ablation margin. 125I seed brachytherapy delivers continuous low-dose-rate irradiation and may provide sustained suppression of marginal residual disease and microscopic extension. The trial hypothesis is that, under standardized image guidance and treatment planning/quality control, combining the rapid debulking effect of cryoablation with the sustained inhibitory effect of ^125I seeds will reduce the risk of local recurrence/progression, prolong local disease control, and improve overall local efficacy without a disproportionate increase in severe toxicity.

Eligible participants who complete baseline assessments will be randomized in parallel at a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three treatment arms: (1) sequential combination arm-125I seed implantation followed by cryoablation within a protocol-defined interval; (2) 125I seed implantation alone arm-standardized 125I seed implantation only; or (3) cryoablation alone arm-standardized cryoablation only. Owing to the nature of the interventions, treatment allocation is open label. To minimize assessment bias, all imaging-based efficacy endpoints will be evaluated using a prespecified blinded assessment process by independent assessors who are not involved in treatment delivery and are blinded to treatment assignment; adjudication will be performed when necessary to ensure objective and consistent endpoint determination.

All participants will undergo baseline evaluations before treatment, including tumor burden assessment and confirmation of target lesions, prior treatment history, physical examination and laboratory tests, pain and quality-of-life instruments, and imaging-based staging and target-lesion measurements. Target lesions will be prespecified at baseline as the subjects of subsequent local endpoint assessments. 125I seed implantation will be performed under CT or other site-qualified imaging guidance, with standardized documentation of key planning and dosimetric parameters, including prescription dose, target coverage, and organ-at-risk constraints. Cryoablation will likewise be performed under image guidance according to uniform technical specifications, and technical success and peri-procedural events will be recorded in a standardized manner. In the sequential combination arm, the interval between the two procedures will be explicitly defined in the protocol to ensure comparability of the treatment window across centers.

Endpoints are focused on local control, disease progression, and safety. The primary endpoints are the local control rate (LCR) of prespecified target lesions and progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints include local progression-free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS), early pain response, technical success, target-lesion re-intervention rate, and safety (with particular attention to grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events graded and attributed per CTCAE v5.0). Exploratory analyses include associations between dosimetric parameters and efficacy/toxicity outcomes, imaging/radiomics biomarkers, and the dynamics of peripheral blood biomarkers, to inform protocol refinement and future patient stratification.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250031
        • The 960th Hospital of People's Liberation Army (PLA)
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged ≥18 years;
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumor that is unresectable and for which local therapy is clinically appropriate;
  • At least one prespecified target lesion suitable for percutaneous image-guided treatment and considered technically feasible for both 125I seed implantation and cryoablation per investigator assessment (and protocol-defined anatomic/dosimetric safety criteria);
  • ECOG performance status 0-2;
  • Adequate organ function, acceptable coagulation status, and the ability to safely undergo percutaneous image-guided procedures;
  • Written informed consent provided.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior 125I seed implantation or cryoablation to the same target lesion(s), or other local therapy to the target lesion(s);
  • Target lesion location or anatomy that, in the investigator's judgment, makes either procedure unsafe or unlikely to achieve protocol-defined coverage/ablation (e.g., inability to meet organ-at-risk constraints or required safety margins);
  • Uncontrolled bleeding risk or coagulopathy not correctable per protocol; inability to safely hold/bridge anticoagulants/antiplatelets as required.

Active, uncontrolled infection, including uncontrolled local infection at the intended procedure site;

  • Clinically significant uncontrolled comorbidities that increase procedural risk;
  • Severe organ dysfunction that precludes procedures or follow-up, per protocol-defined thresholds.;
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Known hypersensitivity to materials/medications essential for the procedures (e.g., contrast agents or anesthetics) that cannot be adequately managed;
  • Any condition that would impair reliable outcome assessment or adherence (e.g., inability to undergo required imaging, expected poor compliance), per investigator judgment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sequential 125I Seed Implantation Followed by Cryoablation
Participants receive percutaneous image-guided iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation, followed by image-guided cryoablation within a protocol-defined interval.
Combined sequential local therapy consisting of 125I seed implantation followed by cryoablation within a protocol-defined interval; both procedures are performed under image guidance and documented according to protocol-specified standards.
Active Comparator: 125I Seed Implantation Alone
Participants receive standardized percutaneous image-guided iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation alone.
Percutaneous, image-guided implantation of 125I radioactive seeds into the prespecified target lesion(s) according to a protocol-defined treatment plan. Key planning and dosimetric parameters (e.g., prescription dose, target coverage, and organ-at-risk constraints) are recorded per protocol.
Active Comparator: Cryoablation Alone
Participants receive standardized percutaneous image-guided cryoablation alone.
Percutaneous, image-guided cryoablation of the prespecified target lesion(s) performed using a standardized protocol-defined technique (e.g., applicator placement and freeze-thaw cycles) with documentation of technical success and peri-procedural events per protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local Control Rate (LCR)
Time Frame: From randomization up to 12 months
Proportion of prespecified target lesion(s) without local progression/recurrence as determined by protocol-defined imaging criteria. Imaging-based assessments are performed by blinded independent reviewers with adjudication as needed.
From randomization up to 12 months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From randomization up to 12 months
Time from randomization to first documentation of disease progression (per protocol-defined criteria) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
From randomization up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local Progression-Free Survival (LPFS)
Time Frame: From randomization up to 12 months
Time from randomization to local progression of the prespecified target lesion(s) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
From randomization up to 12 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From randomization up to 24 months
Time from randomization to death from any cause.
From randomization up to 24 months
Early Pain Response
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 month post-procedure
Pain intensity from baseline to 1 month postoperatively will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; 0-10 points, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable; higher scores indicate more severe pain) and will be expressed as the absolute change (ΔVAS = VAS_[1 month postoperatively] - VAS_[baseline], unit: points; ΔVAS < 0 indicates pain relief).
Baseline to 1 month post-procedure
Technical Success
Time Frame: During the procedure period (day of procedure)
Successful completion of the assigned procedure(s) per protocol-defined technical criteria (e.g., planned seed implantation achieved; cryoablation delivered as planned).
During the procedure period (day of procedure)
Target-Lesion Re-intervention Rate
Time Frame: From randomization up to 12 months
Proportion of participants requiring any additional local intervention for the prespecified target lesion(s) after initial assigned treatment.
From randomization up to 12 months
Safety (Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events)
Time Frame: From first procedure up to 12 months
Incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) graded per CTCAE v5.0; includes serious adverse events and procedure-related complications per protocol.
From first procedure up to 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dosimetry-Outcome Associations
Time Frame: From baseline through 12 months
Association between target D90 (unit: Gy; derived from the treatment planning system/DVH) and the incidence of Grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicity (unit: % of participants; assessed per CTCAE v5.0) from baseline through 12 months.
From baseline through 12 months
Radiomics Biomarkers
Time Frame: From baseline through 12 months
Imaging-derived and radiomics features evaluated for association with local control and/or early response.
From baseline through 12 months
Peripheral Blood Biomarker Dynamics
Time Frame: From baseline through 12 months
Longitudinal changes in protocol-specified peripheral blood biomarkers and their associations with efficacy/toxicity outcomes.
From baseline through 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Min Li, The 960th Hospital of People's Liberation Army (PLA)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request after completion of the study and publication of the primary results. Data to be shared may include demographic information, treatment assignment, key efficacy outcomes, adverse events, and imaging-derived parameters. A data-sharing agreement will be required to ensure appropriate use of the dataset.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Individual participant data (IPD) will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary study results and will remain available for 5 years following publication, or until the main study database is closed, whichever occurs first.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Unresectable Solid Tumors

Clinical Trials on Sequential 125I Seed Implantation Followed by Cryoablation

Subscribe