Modified Essential Frailty Toolset in Older Adults Undergoing Major Elective Surgery

March 6, 2026 updated by: Luis Gísli Rabelo, University of Iceland

Modified Essential Frailty Toolset for Predicting Postoperative Complications and Readmission in Older Adults Undergoing Major Elective Surgery

Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome associated with reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to surgical stress. As the population ages, more older adults undergo major elective surgery, yet frailty is often insufficiently assessed in routine practice and no universally accepted screening tool exists.

The Essential Frailty Toolset (EFT) is a simple validated frailty assessments and has demonstrated strong predictive value for mortality and major postoperative complications, particularly in cardiac surgery populations. EFT incorporates four key domains of cognition, anemia, serum albumin, and physical function capturing both physical and cognitive vulnerability. A modified version (mEFT) has been developed to improve feasibility and applicability in broader surgical settings, requiring minimal training and only a few minutes to administer. Despite its promise, mEFT has not been evaluated in elderly patients undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery, representing an important gap in the current literature and motivating the present study.

We therefore propose a modified and simplified frailty screening tool tailored for elderly patients undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery at our institution. The modified Essential Frailty Toolset (mEFT) is a multi-dimensional assessment designed to address this gap by evaluating physical function, cognition, nutrition, and anemia in just a few minutes. In this version, the tool assigns points based on specific clinical markers: the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test provides one point for a time ≥11.0 seconds and two points for ≥15.0 seconds; the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) provides one point for a score of ≤2 on a 3-point scale; nutritional risk is captured with one point for a BMI <22.0 or unintentional weight loss of 5% over the last six months; and anemia provides one point based on hemoglobin levels (below 130g/L for men and 120 g/L for women). These modifications were made to enhance feasibility and clinical relevance in our population. Low serum albumin was rare in our cohort and therefore demonstrated limited discriminatory value as a screening marker. In contrast, low BMI and recent weight loss are well-established risk factors for malnutrition and sarcopenia and are readily obtainable in routine preoperative assessment. Similarly, both the TUG and CDT are quick, inexpensive, and require minimal training, making them well suited for large-scale screening in preoperative clinics.Importantly, the proposed components have been evaluated in a pilot study conducted in our institution.

This study will evaluate whether a high mEFT score (≥3) is associated with increased postoperative complications and 90-day readmissions among patients aged ≥70 years undergoing major elective surgery. Patients presenting for admission will be included. If mEFT accurately identifies high-risk patients, it may improve preoperative risk stratification, inform shared decision-making, and help identify individuals who could benefit from targeted prehabilitation, supporting broader implementation of frailty screening in surgical care.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Martin I Sigurdsson, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +354-824-8282
  • Email: mingi@hi.is

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Luis G Rabelo, MD
  • Phone Number: +3548203587
  • Email: lgr2@hi.is

Study Locations

    • Hofudborgarsvaedid
      • Reykjavik, Hofudborgarsvaedid, Iceland, 101
        • Recruiting
        • Landspitali University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Luis Rabelo
          • Phone Number: 8203587
          • Email: lgr2@hi.is

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

he study population will consist of all patients ≥70 years who have present for preoperative assessment at the admissions department at Landspitali before undergoing major surgery, University Hospital of Iceland.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥ 70 years who present for preoperative work-up at the admissions department at Landspitali and undergo frailty screening.
  • Patients assigned to undergo major surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac surgery
  • Not undergoing planned surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Frailty screening cohort undergoing major elective surgery
Patients ≥ 70 years undergoing major elective surgery who are triaged to present for preoperative assessment at the admissions department at Landspitali University Hospital in Iceland. Patients who screen positive on the mEFT (≥3 points) will be considered frail. Those who do not screen positive (≤2 points) will be part of the control group (non-frail).
Any major elective surgery at Landspítali University Hospital

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90-day Readmission
Time Frame: From the day of surgery to postoperative day 90.
Readmission to any hospital in Iceland where the patient is admitted to any inpatient department. Emergency department enrollment without admission will not be counted as readmission. Readmissions to the same hospital on the same day for the same principal diagnosis are not counted in the outcome.
From the day of surgery to postoperative day 90.
Surgical Complications
Time Frame: From the same day after surgery to postoperative day 30.
Description: This outcome measures the incidence of adverse events after surgery and will be categorized based on the Clavien-Dindo classification grading system using the cut-off of ≥2; complications requiring pharmacological intervention (grade II), requiring additional procedures (grade III), life-threatening complications(grade IV) and a complication resulting in death (grade V).
From the same day after surgery to postoperative day 30.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-home discharge
Time Frame: From the day of surgery (postoperative day 0) until discharge to a non-home destination or discharge from the primary hospitalization, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 180 days postoperatively.
Non-home discharge will be identified as the postoperative hospital discharge to a nursing home or a rehabilitation center. Discharge to patient hotels will not be included. In addition, non-home discharge will not include patients who live in a nursing home prior to the surgery.
From the day of surgery (postoperative day 0) until discharge to a non-home destination or discharge from the primary hospitalization, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 180 days postoperatively.
Prolonged length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Postoperative day 0 through discharge from the index hospitalization (up to 180 days).
Prolonged length of hospital stay will be defined as an index hospitalization lasting 10 days or longer following the surgical procedure. Length of stay will be calculated as the number of days from the day of surgery to discharge.
Postoperative day 0 through discharge from the index hospitalization (up to 180 days).
180-day mortality
Time Frame: Up to 180 days after the primary surgery
Defined as the death of the patient after surgery
Up to 180 days after the primary surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The individual participant data collected during this study will not be shared due to confidentiality. Additionally, there is no formal plan for making these data publicly available at this time.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Major elective surgery

Subscribe