Causal Role of Rostromedial Prefrontal Cortex for Positive Savoring in Depression (rmPFC-Savoring)

May 18, 2026 updated by: Justin Riddle, Florida State University
This is a non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroimaging study that will examine how activity in the medial prefrontal cortex influences reward processing, particularly positive savoring, in individuals with depression. The central question is whether modulating medial prefrontal brain regions using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) alters neural and behavioral responses to rewards. Brain activity will be recorded using both electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while participants perform reward tasks. The primary objectives are to (1) identify patterns of brain activity linked to impaired reward processing in depression using EEG and fMRI, and (2) determine the causal role of specific prefrontal areas in these processes through targeted TMS. The methods include four sessions over four weeks: a clinical assessment, EEG recording during reward tasks after participants learn/practice positive savoring, an fMRI session, and a TMS session combined with EEG while participants practice positive savoring and perform reward tasks during EEG.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32306
        • Florida State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between the ages of 18 and 65
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Have normal or corrected vision
  • Right handed
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
  • Speak and understand English
  • Not color blind
  • Acceptable suicide risk as determined by less than 5 on the Depression Symptom Index Suicidality Subscale (DSI-SS)
  • A diagnosis of major depressive disorder (current episode) on the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 (SCID-5)
  • Between the ages of 18 and 65

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ADHD (currently under treatment)
  • Neurological disorders and conditions. Including but not limited to: history of epilepsy, seizures (except childhood febrile seizures), dementia, history of stroke, Parkindon's disease, multiple sclerosis, cerebral aneurysm, brain tumors
  • Medical or neurological illness or treatment for a medical disorder that could interfere with study participation. For example, unstable cardiac disease, HIV/AIDS, malignancy, liver or renal impairment
  • Prior brain surgery
  • Any brain devices/implants, including cochlear implants and aneurysm clips, cardiac pacemaker, or any other implanted electronic device
  • History of current traumatic brain injury
  • Pregnancy (for females)
  • Claustrophobia
  • DSM-5 diagnosis of present moderate or severe substance use disorder or alcohol use disorder, and past severe substance use disorder or alcohol use disorder, bipolar disorder, or psychotic disorder
  • Based on the use of MRI, additional exclusion criteria are considered. These include participants having ferrous metal in their body, having non-removable jewelry that is ferrous, having tattoos on the face or neck, history of being a metal worker or having an eye injury involving metal
  • Anything that in the opinion of the investigator would place the participant at increased risk or preclude the participant's full compliance with or completion of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Left Rostromedial Prefrontal Cortex - Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst
Accelerated intermittent theta burst will be delivered to left rostromedial prefrontal cortex, which has been previously shown to manipulate reward sensitivity. We are testing if this also impacts positive savoring as measured by the late positive potential during EEG and positive affect. This is an experimental condition that will be compared to an active comparator and a sham comparator.
For accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS), stimulation intensity will be set at 80% resting motor threshold (rMT), a level that has been established to be safe and effective. aiTBS will consist of bursts containing 3 pulses at 50 Hz. Bursts will be delivered at 5 Hz for 2 seconds at 80% of rMT, followed by 8 seconds without stimulation. This pattern will continue for 60 cycles (1800 pulses), for a total elapsed time of 10 minutes. Participants will be randomized to receive aiTBS to their mPFC, dlPFC, or primary somatosensory cortex (S1) a total of two times in a single session for 10 minutes each (spaced 50 minutes apart) before/after EEG preparation and practicing a positive affect technique (i.e., savoring), and before performing a positive savoring and reward responsivity task during EEG.
Active Comparator: Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex - Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst
Accelerated intermittent theta burst will be delivered to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which is considered "treatment as usual" for depression.
For accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS), stimulation intensity will be set at 80% resting motor threshold (rMT), a level that has been established to be safe and effective. aiTBS will consist of bursts containing 3 pulses at 50 Hz. Bursts will be delivered at 5 Hz for 2 seconds at 80% of rMT, followed by 8 seconds without stimulation. This pattern will continue for 60 cycles (1800 pulses), for a total elapsed time of 10 minutes. Participants will be randomized to receive aiTBS to their mPFC, dlPFC, or primary somatosensory cortex (S1) a total of two times in a single session for 10 minutes each (spaced 50 minutes apart) before/after EEG preparation and practicing a positive affect technique (i.e., savoring), and before performing a positive savoring and reward responsivity task during EEG.
Placebo Comparator: Left Primary Somatosensory Cortex - Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst
Accelerated intermittent theta burst will be delivered to left primary somatosensory cortex, which is a placebo intervention condition.
For accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS), stimulation intensity will be set at 80% resting motor threshold (rMT), a level that has been established to be safe and effective. aiTBS will consist of bursts containing 3 pulses at 50 Hz. Bursts will be delivered at 5 Hz for 2 seconds at 80% of rMT, followed by 8 seconds without stimulation. This pattern will continue for 60 cycles (1800 pulses), for a total elapsed time of 10 minutes. Participants will be randomized to receive aiTBS to their mPFC, dlPFC, or primary somatosensory cortex (S1) a total of two times in a single session for 10 minutes each (spaced 50 minutes apart) before/after EEG preparation and practicing a positive affect technique (i.e., savoring), and before performing a positive savoring and reward responsivity task during EEG.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Late Positive Potential during Positive Savoring
Time Frame: From baseline EEG to post-stimulation EEG approximately 2 weeks apart
The late positive potential (LPP) is an established event-related potential that has been shown to be higher when savoring positive feelings elicited by positive images compared to neutral images. Changes in the LPP will be assessed from baseline EEG to post-stimulation EEG and compared between stimulation sites (left rostromedial PFC, left dorsolateral PFC, left primary somatosensory cortex).
From baseline EEG to post-stimulation EEG approximately 2 weeks apart

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive Affect Ratings on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: From the start to the end of a 3 hour study visit
Positive Affect subscale ratings on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) self-report measure will be collected at the start and end of the stimulation visit, which will be used to assess the secondary outcome of acute positive affect change. The full PANAS measure includes 20 items with Negative Affect (NA) and Positive Affect (PA) subscales of 10 items each. Scores can range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of either NA or PA. This will be compared across the three stimulation sites.
From the start to the end of a 3 hour study visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with FSU.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

from 9 to 36 months following publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with FSU.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Left Rostromedial Prefrontal Cortex - Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst

Clinical Trials on Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Subscribe