Toric Performance And Constant Evaluation (PACE)

March 10, 2026 updated by: Carl Zeiss Meditec AG

Prospective Assessment of Constant Optimization and Visual Outcomes Following Monofocal Toric IOL Implantation

The main purpose of this investigation is to support safety and performance assessment of the investigational device with a focus on optimizing the IOL constants based on refractive outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

130

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Prague, Czechia
        • Oční Centrum Praha
        • Contact:
          • Study Coordinator
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andrea Janeková
      • Prague, Czechia
        • Ustredni vojenska nemocnice - Vojenska fakultni nemocnice Praha
        • Contact:
          • Study Coordinator
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Iveta Němcová
    • Prague
      • Prague, Prague, Czechia, 18100
        • Oční klinikaO
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jiří Pašta
      • Alicante, Spain, 03001
        • Ofatlivist Alicante
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pedro Tañá
    • Ayrshire
      • Ayr, Ayrshire, United Kingdom, KA7 2SP
        • Ayrshire Eye Clinic
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Satish Srinivasan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or older;
  • Patients willing, able, and with sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures and schedule for follow-up visits;
  • Patients with clinically significant age-related cataract (cataract grades of 1, 2, 3 on the LOCSIII scale, but otherwise healthy, requiring surgical treatment, and scheduled for unilateral or bilateral phacoemulsification or Femtosecond-Laser-Assisted cataract surgery;
  • Patients with existing regular corneal astigmatism of minimum 0.75 D in at least the first eye to be operated.
  • Signed informed consent form;
  • Corrected distance visual acuity projected to be better than 0.2 logMAR after the cataract surgery, as determined by Investigator's medical judgment;
  • Calculated IOL power within the range of the investigational IOL; SE +18.0 D to +28.0 D (0.5 D Steps), and between a Cylinder range of +1.0 D to +2.5 D (0.5 D Steps);
  • Dilated pupil size large enough to visualize TIOL axis markings postoperatively; at least 5.5mm;
  • Clear intraocular media other than cataract.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous intraocular or corneal surgery in either eye that might confound the outcome of the study or increase the risk to the subject;
  • Keratometric astigmatism (assessed by IOL Master) of minimum 0.75 D in the first eye
  • Traumatic cataract;
  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Concurrent participation in another drug or device investigation within the last 30 days;
  • Irregular astigmatism;
  • Instability of keratometry or biometry measurements;
  • Subjects wearing contact lenses as standard vision aid;
  • Abnormal pupil;
  • Any anterior segment pathology that could significantly affect outcomes (e.g. chronic or recurrent uveitis, iritis, aniridia, rubeosis iridis, etc.);
  • History of concurrent intraocular inflammation;
  • Abnormal corneal findings in either eye (e.g. keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, or clinically significant corneal membrane dystrophies);
  • History of any clinically significant retinal or ocular pathology or ocular diagnosis (e.g. diabetic retinopathy, ischemic diseases, macular degeneration, retinal detachment, optic neuropathy optic nerve atrophy, amblyopia, strabismus, microphthalmus, epiretinal membrane, Choroidal hemorrhage etc.) in the study eyes that could alter or limit final postoperative visual prognosis;
  • Pseudoexfoliation syndrome (according to investigator judgement);
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma or IOP higher than 24mmHg under ocular hypertension treatment;
  • All kind of infections (acute ocular disease, external / internal infection, systemic infection);
  • Monophthalmic patient;
  • Patients, who are unable to fixate for a longer time, e.g. strabismus, nystagmus, Parkinson disease
  • Patient expected to require retinal laser treatment before the end of the last follow-up examination;
  • Patient expected to require refractive laser treatment / refractive laser touch-up before the end of the last follow-up examination;
  • Patients who may be reasonably expected to require a secondary surgical intervention at any time during the investigation (other than Nd:YAG capsulotomy)
  • In case of both eyes included in this trial: Patients who need to undergo surgery on both eyes on the same day

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Unilateral or bilateral implantation of investigational device
The device under investigation is a CE-approved monofocal bitoric, aspheric, aberration-correcting intraocular lens indicated for aphakia after surgical extraction of the cataractous natural lens and is also indicated for the correction of regular corneal astigmatism.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Refractive predictability
Time Frame: From preoperative visit to the final postoperative visit at twelve months
Difference between predicted Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent and achieved Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent at the final postoperative visit: Percentage of first implanted eyes within ± 1.0 D
From preoperative visit to the final postoperative visit at twelve months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Refractive outcomes
Time Frame: From preoperative visit to the final postoperative visit at twelve months
Manifest Refraction: Sphere, Cylinder, Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent
From preoperative visit to the final postoperative visit at twelve months
Refractive predictability
Time Frame: From preoperative visit to the final postoperative visit at twelve months
Percentage of eyes within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.5 D, & ± 1.0 D
From preoperative visit to the final postoperative visit at twelve months
Reduction in cylindrical power
Time Frame: From preoperative visit to the final postoperative visit at twelve months
The change in manifest refractive cylinder from baseline to the final postoperative visit.
From preoperative visit to the final postoperative visit at twelve months
IOL Rotation
Time Frame: From preoperative visit to the final postoperative visit at twelve months
Percentage of IOLs with IOL rotation with less than 10 and 20 degrees.
From preoperative visit to the final postoperative visit at twelve months
Stability of IOL axis orientation
Time Frame: Between 30 to 60 days and 120 to 180 days
Expressed as percentage of IOLs that rotate ≤ +/- 5 degrees postoperatively
Between 30 to 60 days and 120 to 180 days
Axis Misalignment
Time Frame: From baseline to postoperative visit 120-180 days
The absolute difference between intended IOL axis orientation and measured IOL axis orientation with less than 10 and 20 degrees.
From baseline to postoperative visit 120-180 days
Monocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA)
Time Frame: 12-Month Postoperative
12-Month Postoperative
Percentage of eyes that achieve UDVA within 0.0 and 0.30 logMAR or better
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
12-Months Postoperatively
Monocular Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA)
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
12-Months Postoperatively
Monocular Uncorrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (UIVA)
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
12-Months Postoperatively
Monocular Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA)
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
12-Months Postoperatively
Monocular (1st eye implantations) defocus curve
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
12-Months Postoperatively
Binocular defocus curve on subjects implanted binocularly
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
12-Months Postoperatively
Intraocular Pressure
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
12-Months Postoperatively
Assessment of subject satisfaction, patient reported outcomes, and spectacle independence
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
12-Months Postoperatively
IOL observations
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
IOL Decentration, Tilt, Discoloration, Opacity, Glistenings
12-Months Postoperatively

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preservation of Corrected Distance Visual Acuity
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
Rate of eyes with postoperative CDVA 0.3 logMAR or better
12-Months Postoperatively
Contrast Sensitivity
Time Frame: Six-Months Postoperatively
Six-Months Postoperatively
Posterior Capsule Opacification
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
Rate of occurrence and grading
12-Months Postoperatively
Rate of performed and planned Nd:YAG laser capsulotomies
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
12-Months Postoperatively
Signs of intraocular inflammation
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
  • Anterior chamber cells following Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) grading scheme
  • Anterior chamber flare following SUN grading scheme
  • Vitreous cells, following National Institutes of Health (NIH) grading scheme
  • Cystoid macular oedema
  • Hypopyon
  • Endophthalmitis
12-Months Postoperatively
Slit lamp biomicoscopy
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
  • Eyelid
  • Conjunctiva
  • Corneal Edema
  • Other corneal abnormalities
12-Months Postoperatively
Fundus examination
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
  • Retina
  • Macula
  • Optic Nerve
12-Months Postoperatively
Adverse event rate of Posterior Chamber IOL
Time Frame: 12-Months Postoperatively
As per ISO 11979:2024
12-Months Postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gerd Auffarth, Dr. Med, University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Janeková, MD, Ph.D, Eye Centre Prague
  • Principal Investigator: Iveta Němcová, MD, Ph.D, Military University Hospital, Prague
  • Principal Investigator: Jiří Pašta, Doc.MUDr, Premium Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Satish Srinivasan, M.D, Ayrshire Eye Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Pedro Tañá, M.D, Oftalmología Vistahermosa S.L

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GPAS-SAS-026-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on Monofocal toric IOL

Subscribe