Taabo Tutoring Study

April 1, 2026 updated by: San Diego State University

Tutoring and Targeting to Reduce Secondary School Dropout in Côte d'Ivoire

Secondary school completion rates remain low in many low- and middle-income countries, including Côte d'Ivoire. Limited progression through lower secondary education may affect future educational and employment opportunities. In rural areas, pass rates on the Grade 10 national examination are modest, and some students leave school before completing lower secondary education. This study will evaluate whether tutoring improves academic outcomes and school continuation in the Taabo region of Côte d'Ivoire.

Approximately 1,000 adolescents will participate in two related substudies. The first substudy will include 500 Grade 10 students identified by schools as being at risk of not passing the national examination. The second substudy will include 500 adolescents who previously attended Grades 7-9 but are not currently enrolled in school. Within each substudy, participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: peer tutoring, teacher tutoring, or no additional tutoring (control group).

Students assigned to tutoring may receive up to 15 sessions over approximately 6 to 8 months. Tutoring sessions will focus on reviewing core curriculum content, preparing for examinations, and strengthening academic skills.

The primary outcomes are (1) passing the Grade 10 national examination and (2) enrollment in lower secondary school in the following academic year. Secondary outcomes include grade progression, study time, academic confidence, cost-effectiveness of the tutoring models, academic and well-being outcomes among peer tutors, and other longer-term outcomes (educational attainment, early family formation, mental health).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Secondary school completion rates remain limited in many low- and middle-income countries, including Côte d'Ivoire. In rural areas, a substantial share of students do not pass the Grade 10 national examination, and some adolescents leave school before completing lower secondary education. There is limited evidence on the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different tutoring models at the secondary level in West Africa, particularly for both currently enrolled students and adolescents who are no longer enrolled.

This study is a randomized controlled education trial conducted in approximately 25 lower secondary schools in the Taabo Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) area of Côte d'Ivoire. The study consists of two related substudies.

Substudy 1 focuses on Grade 10 students identified by schools as being at risk of not passing the national examination. Substudy 2 focuses on adolescents who previously attended Grades 7-9 but are not currently enrolled in school at the start of the academic year.

Within each substudy, approximately 500 eligible participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned at the individual level to one of three groups:

  • Peer tutoring
  • Teacher tutoring
  • Control (no additional tutoring provided by the study)

Tutoring will be delivered in small groups and may include up to 15 sessions over approximately 6 to 8 months. Peer tutors will be selected from higher-performing students nominated by school principals and randomly chosen among eligible candidates. Teacher tutoring will be delivered by trained teachers following structured lesson plans emphasizing curriculum review and examination preparation.

Primary outcomes are:

  • Passing the Grade 10 national examination (Substudy 1)
  • Enrollment in lower secondary school in the following academic year (Substudy 2)

Secondary outcomes include grade progression, attendance, study time, academic confidence, and cost-effectiveness of each tutoring model. The study will also assess academic performance and well-being among peer tutors and longer-term outcomes.

Study documents will be retained for 15 years to assess long-term education and health impacts of the intervention (educational attainment, early family formation, mental health). Long-term follow-up will occur only for participants who are registered in the Taabo HDSS.

Results from this trial will contribute evidence on scalable tutoring approaches to improve secondary school progression in rural West African settings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Jan-Walter De Neve, MD ScD
  • Phone Number: 857-333-9297
  • Email: jdeneve@sdsu.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Taabo, Côte d’Ivoire
        • Centre suisse de recherche scientifique en Côte d'Ivoire
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria (Substudy 1)

  • Enrolled in Grade 10 (troisième) during the 2025/26 school year in one of the 25 participating lower secondary schools.
  • Identified by school principals as weak performers at high risk of failing the final grade 10 exam (based on exam scores, teacher assessments, or internal academic performance indicators).
  • Males or females, aged 12 years or older at enrollment.
  • Residing in the Taabo HDSS catchment area.
  • Able to participate in small-group tutoring sessions.
  • Parent or guardian provides written informed consent for minors; student provides written assent.

Inclusion Criteria (Substudy 2)

  • Attended Grades 7-9 (6e, 5e, or 4e) during the 2025/26 academic year.
  • Did not re-enroll in any lower secondary school at the start of the 2026/27 academic year, verified through school records and home visits.
  • Males or females aged 12 years or older at enrollment.
  • Residing in the Taabo HDSS catchment area.
  • Able to participate in tutoring sessions organized after recruitment.
  • Parent or legal guardian provides written informed consent for minors; student provides written assent.

Exclusion Criteria (both substudies)

  • Individuals with severe cognitive or physical disabilities that would prevent meaningful participation in tutoring, based on information from parents, principals, and teachers.
  • Adolescents or families planning to move out of the study area during the intervention period.
  • For Substudy 2 only: adolescents who have already enrolled in an alternative education or vocational training programme at baseline.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Peer tutoring
Peer tutoring led by older and higher-performing peers from the same school.
Peer tutoring led by older and higher-performing peers from the same school implemented in small groups (e.g., 3-6 students). Tutors will be nominated by school principals and then randomly selected among eligible candidates to allow causal assessment of tutoring opportunities on tutors. Sessions will focus on: (i) reviewing core curriculum content; (ii) supporting homework and exam preparation; and (iii) building basic skills and academic confidence. Tutors will receive training on pedagogy, content, and classroom management, as well as simple monitoring tools (attendance sheets, short exercises). Student tutoring will involve up to 15 sessions, typically 1-2 sessions per week. For budgeting and planning, we assume an average of 10 sessions per student, with flexibility to increase up to 15 sessions where feasible.
Experimental: Teacher tutoring
Teacher tutoring led by trained teachers.
Teacher tutoring led by trained teachers and implemented in small groups (e.g., 3-6 students). Teachers will follow structured lesson plans emphasizing remedial instruction and exam-relevant material. Sessions will emphasize active learning, practice exercises, and frequent low-stakes assessments. Teacher tutoring will involve up to 15 sessions, typically 1-2 sessions per week. For budgeting and planning, we assume an average of 10 sessions per student, with flexibility to increase up to 15 sessions where feasible.
No Intervention: Control group
Control: No additional tutoring from the study; students continue to receive the usual teaching and any school-based remedial support.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants passing the Grade 10 national examination (Substudy 1)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after enrollment
Defined as achieving a passing score on the official Grade 10 national examination administered by the Ministry of Education of Côte d'Ivoire. Pass/fail status will be obtained from official examination records. This is a binary outcome (pass vs. fail).
Up to 12 months after enrollment
Proportion of participants enrolled in lower secondary school in the following academic year (Substudy 2)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as official enrollment in lower secondary school (or equivalent formal education program) in the academic year following baseline participation. Enrollment status will be verified using school administrative records and, where necessary, household confirmation. This is a binary outcome (enrolled vs. not enrolled).
Up to 18 months after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants enrolled in senior secondary school following the Grade 10 examination (Substudy 1)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as enrollment in senior secondary school in the academic year following the Grade 10 national examination. Enrollment status will be obtained from school administrative records. This is a binary outcome (enrolled vs. not enrolled).
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Proportion of participants not enrolled in any secondary institution after Grade 10 examination results (Substudy 1)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as non-enrollment in any recognized secondary school in the academic year following the Grade 10 examination results. Enrollment status will be obtained from school records. This is a binary outcome (not enrolled vs. enrolled).
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Study time, homework completion, and exam confidence (Substudy 1)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as self-reported weekly study hours, frequency of homework completion, and self-reported confidence in examination performance, collected through structured survey instruments. These are continuous and ordinal outcomes.
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Proportion of participants promoted to the next grade at endline (Substudy 2)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as successful completion of the current grade and promotion to the next grade level, verified using administrative records where available. This is a binary outcome (promoted vs. not promoted).
Up to 18 months after enrollment
School attendance (Substudy 2)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as the total number of days attended during the academic year, measured using school administrative records where available and supplemented by self-report. This is a continuous outcome (days attended).
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Persistence in school at the end of the 2026/27 academic year (Substudy 2)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as enrollment status at the end of the 2026/27 academic year, verified through school records. This is a binary outcome (enrolled vs. not enrolled).
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Term and final grades (Tutors)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as official term grades and final average grades obtained from school administrative records during the study period. These grades will be recorded as continuous numeric scores (e.g., 0-20 scale or school-specific grading scale).
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Examination pass rates (Tutors)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as achieving a passing score on official school examinations during the study period. Pass/fail status will be based on school administrative records. This is a binary outcome (pass vs. fail).
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Educational aspirations and perceived returns to schooling (Tutors)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as self-reported expectations regarding future education and perceived benefits of secondary schooling, collected using structured survey questions. These are continuous and ordinal outcomes.
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Time allocation, stress, and well-being (Tutors)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as self-reported weekly time use, perceived stress, and general well-being measured through structured questionnaires. These are continuous and ordinal outcomes.
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Cost per additional student passing the Grade 10 national examination (Substudy 1)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as the total program costs (USD) divided by the estimated incremental number of additional students passing the Grade 10 national examination relative to the control group.
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Cost per additional student enrolled and cost per additional student promoted (Substudy 2)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months after enrollment
Defined as total program costs (USD) divided by the estimated incremental number of additional students enrolled in school and/or promoted to the next grade relative to the control group.
Up to 18 months after enrollment
Total years of schooling completed (Long-term outcome)
Time Frame: Up to 15 years after enrollment
Defined as the total number of completed years of formal schooling as recorded in administrative education records and follow-up data. This is a continuous outcome (years completed).
Up to 15 years after enrollment
Total number of children before age 20 years (Long-term outcome)
Time Frame: Up to 15 years after enrollment
Defined as the total number of biological children reported before age 20. This is a count outcome.
Up to 15 years after enrollment
Number of days in which mental health was reported as not good (Long-term outcome)
Time Frame: Up to 15 years after enrollment
Defined as the self-reported number of days during the past 30 days in which mental health was described as "not good." This is a continuous outcome (days).
Up to 15 years after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan-Walter De Neve, MD ScD, San Diego State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2041

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

A fully de-identified dataset (with no participant names, phone numbers, addresses, exact birth dates, or HDSS identifiers) will be created on a public data repository after publication of the main results and will be made available to other researchers.

Supporting Materials:

Study Protocol

Supporting Materials:

Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

Supporting Materials:

Informed Consent Forms (ICF)

Supporting Materials:

Analytic Code

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publication of the main results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Public data repository

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Academic Performance

Clinical Trials on Peer tutoring

Subscribe