Effects of taVNS Combined With tACS on Adolescents With Non-Suicidal Self-Injury

March 19, 2026 updated by: Hongyan Zhu, Anhui Medical University

Effects of Combined taVNS and tACS on Adolescents With Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

NSSI behavior is highly prevalent among adolescents, and its mechanisms are closely associated with attentional bias toward self-injury-related information and impulsivity, both of which may be related to reduced dlPFC activation levels. Introducing taVNS as a priming stimulus to pre-regulate brain state and optimize subsequent tACS treatment response provides a novel approach to addressing inconsistent intervention effects. Simultaneously, this facilitates a shift in the brain from passive stimulus reception to active state regulation, offering important theoretical foundations for developing more precise and efficient cross-modal neuromodulation therapies.This study aims to systematically validate the efficacy of a combined protocol using taVNS as a priming modality followed by tACS over the left dlPFC through a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The investigators hypothesize that:

① Compared to tACS intervention alone, this combined approach will not only demonstrate non-inferiority in overall therapeutic efficacy but, more importantly, significantly reduce inter-individual variability in treatment response to tACS. This would mitigate the issue of high clinical response heterogeneity and enhance the stability and predictability of treatment outcomes.

② Early behavioral biomarkers of intervention response are anticipated: Immediate improvements in attentional bias following a single combined intervention session will significantly predict reductions in the frequency and intensity of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) after a full course (14 sessions) of treatment. This suggests that early positive changes in cognitive function could serve as valid indicators predicting long-term clinical efficacy, offering a critical time window for implementing individualized treatment adjustments.

③ The study will elucidate the effects of the taVNS-primed combined tACS treatment on neuroimaging mechanisms in adolescents with NSSI.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China
        • Recruiting
        • School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet the proposed diagnostic criteria for non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), with ≥5 documented self-injury episodes and at least one incident within the past month as assessed by the Adolescent Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Assessment Questionnaire (ANSAQ)
  • Aged 12-18 years
  • Right-handed
  • Possess formal education experience sufficient to comprehend experimental protocols
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal binocular visual acuity
  • Voluntarily participate with legal guardians providing written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score < 26
  • History of suicide attempts
  • History of epilepsy, brain surgery, tumors, or clinically significant head trauma
  • History of substance abuse or severe physical diseases
  • Received physical or psychological interventions within the past three months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combined Stimulation Group
deliver 15 minutes taVNS and 20 minutes of 10hz tACS intervention

The active taVNS stimulation was applied to the cymba conchae, an area exclusively innervated by the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. Active taVNS stimulation protocol was set as follows: pulse width of 300 μs, frequency of 25 Hz, and current intensity adjusted based on each participant's individual threshold, set at 80% of the sensory threshold. The stimulation duration was 15 minutes.

Active 10hz transcranial alternating current stimulation: 10 Hz tACS delivered through a 4×1-ring high-definition electrode montage centered on left DLPFC (F3), 2 mA peak-to-peak, 100 % intensity, gradually ramped up over 30 s, maintained for 20 min, then ramped down over 30 s; two sessions per day with at least 4 h between sessions, repeated for 7 consecutive days (14 total sessions).

Active Comparator: tACS-Only Group
deliver sham 15 minutes taVNS and 20 minutes of 10hz tACS intervention

The sham taVNS stimulation was placed on the earlobe. The two procedures were indistinguishable in terms of appearance, ensuring effective blinding. The stimulation duration was 15 minutes.

Active 10HZ transcranial alternating current stimulation: 10 Hz tACS delivered through a 4×1-ring high-definition electrode montage centered on left DLPFC (F3), 2 mA peak-to-peak, 100 % intensity, gradually ramped up over 30 s, maintained for 20 min, then ramped down over 30 s; two sessions per day with at least 4 h between sessions, repeated for 7 consecutive days (14 total sessions).

Placebo Comparator: taVNS-Only Group
deliver 15 minutes taVNS and 20 minutes of sham 10hz tACS sham intervention ,but 10 Hz active sham control the current will be ramped up to 2 mA and then ramped down to 0 mA within the first 30 seconds.

The active taVNS stimulation was applied to the cymba conchae, an area exclusively innervated by the auricular branch of the vagus nerve. active taVNS stimulation protocol was set as follows: pulse width of 300 μs, frequency of 25 Hz, and current intensity adjusted based on each participant's individual threshold, set at 80% of the sensory threshold. The stimulation duration was 15 minutes.

Sham 10HZ transcranial alternating current stimulation: identical 4×1-ring high-definition electrode montage centered on left DLPFC (F3), 2 mA peak-to-peak current ramped up over 30 s and immediately ramped down to 0 mA, followed by 19.5 min of no stimulation to match the 20-min session duration of active tACS; delivered twice daily (≥4 h apart) for 7 consecutive days (14 total sessions).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adolescent Non-suicidal Self-injury Assessment Questionnaire (ANSAQ) reduction in the frequency of self-injury
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment), as well as on day 1, at week 1, and at month 1 post-treatment.
The ANSAQ is a brief, self-report tool specifically designed for adolescents aged 12-18 to quantify non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) over the past year. It is used both to screen for clinically relevant self-harm and to track changes in self-injury frequency after an intervention. Higher frequencies indicate more severe NSSI behavior.
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment), as well as on day 1, at week 1, and at month 1 post-treatment.
Brief Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BBIS)
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
The BBIS is an 8-item, self-report subset of the well-known Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Each item (e.g., "I act on the spur of the moment") is answered on a 4-point scale: 1 = rarely/never, 2 = occasionally, 3 = often, 4 = almost always/always. Total scores range 8-32; higher scores indicate greater impulsivity. Total score: 32. Higher scores indicate greater impulsivity.
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
Eye movement index-fixation counts
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
A free-viewing paradigm consisting of 60 images was employed, with eye movements recorded using an SMI-RED eye-tracking system. Each trial comprised a four-image array: three neutral stimuli and one NSSI-related stimulus, presented for 4000 ms. A dot-probe paradigm consisting of 204 trials was employed, with eye movements recorded using an SMI-RED eye-tracking system. Each trial comprised a pair of images: one neutral stimulus and one NSSI-related stimulus, presented for either 200 ms or 500 ms.The region of interest (ROI) was defined as the area containing the NSSI-related cue. 'Dwell time' was operationalized as the total duration (in milliseconds) that the eyes remained fixated within the ROI during image presentation. Values were averaged across all NSSI-related cue images at baseline (Day 0) and post-intervention (Day 8). A clinically relevant improvement in inhibitory control was defined as a ≥20% reduction in total dwell time on NSSI-related cues relative to baseline.
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
Stop Signal Task(SST)
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
The experiment consisted of 192 trials (64 × 3), preceded by a 20-trial practice phase. Each trial began with a 1.5-second fixation cross, followed by a left- or right-pointing arrow (maximum duration: 2 seconds), to which participants responded as quickly and accurately as possible. In approximately 25% of trials, an auditory stop signal was presented after a variable delay, requiring participants to inhibit their response. The stop-signal delay (SSD) was dynamically adjusted using a staircase procedure (initial delay: 250 ms; ±50 ms based on performance) to index inhibitory control. The inter-trial interval was fixed at 30 seconds.
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
Delay Discounting Task (DDT)
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
The study employed a Delay Discounting Task (DDT) to assess individuals' preference for immediate versus delayed rewards. The task included 80 trials, generated by fully crossing four delayed reward amounts (¥25, ¥50, ¥100, ¥500), five delay durations (7, 14, 30, 90, and 180 days), and four discount rates (70%, 85%, 90%, and 95%). Each trial began with a 1.5-second fixation cross, followed by a simultaneous presentation of two options: a smaller immediate reward and a larger delayed reward, with their positions randomized across trials. Participants selected their preferred option using the left or right arrow keys, and no feedback was provided.、
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) score
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) is a clinician-administered questionnaire widely used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The 17-item version (HAMD-17) is the most commonly used, with total scores ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA-14) score
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14) is a clinician-administered scale assessing the severity of anxiety symptoms. It comprises 14 items, with total scores ranging from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety severity.
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
the score of PANSI
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
14-item self-report that gauges both protective (positive) and risk-related (negative) aspects of suicide ideation in adolescents. Items are rated 1-5; higher totals on the 6-item Positive Ideation sub-scale (range 6-30) indicate greater resilience, while higher totals on the 8-item Negative Ideation sub-scale (range 8-40) signal increased suicide risk.
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
The score of Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS)
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
The Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) is a self-report measure assessing rumination, defined as repetitive and passive thinking about negative emotions and their causes. The 22-item version yields total scores from 22 to 88, with higher scores indicating more frequent rumination.
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
The score of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form (DERS-16)
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form (DERS-16) is a 16-item self-report measure assessing emotion dysregulation across multiple dimensions. It assesses five dimensions: non-acceptance of emotional responses, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behavior, impulse control difficulties, limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and lack of emotional clarity.Total scores range from 16 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater difficulties in emotion.
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment) and on day 1 post-treatment.
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment), as well as on day 1, at week 1, and at month 1 post-treatment.
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a 9-item self-report scale assessing depression severity based on DSM-5 criteria. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. Scores ≥10 suggest moderate depression.
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment), as well as on day 1, at week 1, and at month 1 post-treatment.
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment), as well as on day 1, at week 1, and at month 1 post-treatment.
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) is a 7-item self-report screening tool for anxiety symptoms. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety severity. Scores ≥10 indicate moderate anxiety.
Assessments were conducted at baseline (pre-treatment), as well as on day 1, at week 1, and at month 1 post-treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hongyan Zhu, School of Mental Health and Psychological Sciences, Anhui Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 16, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-suicidal Self-injury

Clinical Trials on 25Hz、300us transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation and10hz transcranial alternating current stimulation

Subscribe