Dual-Target Nectin-4/HER2 CAR-NK Cells in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma (DUET-UC-NK)

March 20, 2026 updated by: Beijing Biotech

A Phase 1, Open-Label, Multicenter, Non-Randomized, Dose-Escalation and Dose-Expansion Study of Allogeneic Dual-Target Nectin-4/HER2 CAR-NK Cells Following Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide Lymphodepletion in Adults With Relapsed/Refractory, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

This hypothetical first-in-human study is designed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of an allogeneic dual-target Nectin-4/HER2 CAR-NK cell product in adults with relapsed/refractory locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Based on public urothelial-cancer evidence, Nectin-4 was selected as the lead antigen because it has the strongest disease-specific clinical validation; HER2/ERBB2 was chosen as the secondary co-target to broaden tumor coverage and reduce antigen-escape risk. EpCAM is not selected as a therapeutic co-target in this example because of broader normal epithelial expression and weaker tumor specificity in urothelial carcinoma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Advanced urothelial carcinoma remains a high-unmet-need disease after platinum-based chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition, and-where available-Nectin-4- or HER2-directed therapies. Public trial activity in urothelial cancer strongly supports Nectin-4 as the best validated anchor antigen, while HER2 identifies a clinically relevant and actionable subset. Because both antigens can be heterogeneous, this example protocol uses mandatory pre-treatment central biomarker testing and favors fresh biopsy after the most recent systemic therapy, especially after prior enfortumab vedotin or HER2-directed treatment.

The investigational product in this example is an allogeneic cord-blood-derived CAR-NK cell therapy engineered to co-recognize Nectin-4 and HER2/ERBB2 and to include an inducible caspase-9 safety switch. The product is administered intravenously after lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Part A uses a 3+3 dose-escalation design with sentinel dosing at each new level to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Part B expands the RP2D to better characterize safety and generate preliminary efficacy data.

To better address the original target shortlist, the protocol also incorporates exploratory translational analyses of EpCAM expression, circulating tumor DNA, tumor antigen co-expression, NK-cell persistence, and mechanisms of resistance. This allows future protocol versions to revisit EpCAM only if patient-specific biomarker data show a favorable therapeutic window.

Tumor assessments are performed by RECIST v1.1 for measurable metastatic disease.

Patients are monitored closely for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), infusion reactions, and organ-specific on-target/off-tumor toxicities. Because HER2 is used as a secondary antigen, this example explicitly incorporates enhanced cardiopulmonary monitoring and conservative dose-escalation rules.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

42

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518036

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-75 years at consent.
  • Histologically confirmed urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, ureter, renal pelvis, or urethra that is unresectable locally advanced or metastatic.
  • Disease progression after, intolerance to, or ineligibility for standard therapy, including platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade when appropriate for the patient and region. Prior enfortumab vedotin and prior HER2-directed therapy are allowed, but a fresh biopsy is strongly preferred after the latest systemic regimen.
  • At least one measurable lesion per RECIST v1.1.
  • Tumor tissue available for central review demonstrating Nectin-4 positivity (for example, IHC ≥1+ in ≥10% tumor cells) and HER2 status assessed by IHC/ISH. At least one of the selected therapeutic targets must be present; dose expansion preferentially enrolls Nectin-4-positive disease.
  • ECOG performance status 0-1.
  • Adequate bone marrow, hepatic, renal, and coagulation function.
  • Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
  • Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential and agreement to use highly effective contraception during study treatment and follow-up as defined in the protocol.
  • Ability to understand and sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active or untreated central nervous system metastases or leptomeningeal disease. Previously treated CNS disease is allowed if clinically stable and off escalating corticosteroids.
  • Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, prior solid-organ transplant, or active graft-versus-host disease.
  • Clinically significant autoimmune disease requiring systemic immunosuppression within the defined washout window.
  • Uncontrolled infection, including uncontrolled hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, sepsis, or active tuberculosis.
  • Clinically significant cardiac disease, active myocarditis, unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction, uncontrolled arrhythmia, or clinically meaningful decline in left ventricular ejection fraction that would increase risk from HER2-directed cell therapy.
  • Clinically significant pulmonary disease (for example, uncontrolled interstitial lung disease or oxygen-dependent respiratory compromise).
  • Use of systemic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications above protocol-allowed limits within the washout window.
  • History of severe hypersensitivity to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, or cell-product excipients.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Another active malignancy requiring systemic therapy or likely to interfere with protocol assessments, except for protocol-allowed low-risk cancers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dose Escalation
Participants receive lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by EB-DT-NK-UC101 IV infusions on Day 1 and Day 8 of a 21-day cycle. Planned dose levels: 1 × 10^7, 3 × 10^7, and 1 × 10^8 CAR-NK cells/kg
Allogeneic cord-blood-derived dual-target Nectin-4/HER2 CAR-NK cells with inducible caspase-9 safety switch.
Lymphodepleting chemotherapy given before the first CAR-NK infusion.
Lymphodepleting chemotherapy given before the first CAR-NK infusion
Other Names:
  • lymphodepletion
Experimental: Dose Expansion
Participants receive the RP2D identified in Arm A using the same lymphodepletion backbone and infusion schedule. Expansion enriches for Nectin-4-positive disease and captures HER2 co-expression prospectively.
Allogeneic cord-blood-derived dual-target Nectin-4/HER2 CAR-NK cells with inducible caspase-9 safety switch.
Lymphodepleting chemotherapy given before the first CAR-NK infusion.
Lymphodepleting chemotherapy given before the first CAR-NK infusion
Other Names:
  • lymphodepletion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame: 28 Days
28 Days
Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events graded by CTCAE v5.0,including CRS, ICANS, infusion reactions, GvHD, and organ-specific toxicities
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Duration of response
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Disease control rate
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 14, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 17, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on EB-DT-NK-UC101

Subscribe