- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07495137
The Improvement Effect of Real-time Artificial Intelligence Assisted Identification of Bleeding Points on Hemostasis Efficiency in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
The Improvement Effect of Real-time Artificial Intelligence Assisted Identification of Bleeding Points on Hemostasis Efficiency in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD): a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if an artificial intelligence (AI) system that identifies bleeding points in real time can help stop bleeding faster during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) - a minimally invasive surgery for early digestive tract cancer or precancerous lesions. It will also learn about the AI system's effect on surgery-related problems (like perforation or delayed bleeding) and total surgery time.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the AI system shorten the time it takes to stop each bleed during ESD?
- How does the AI system affect the rate of surgery-related problems and total surgery time?
Researchers will compare two groups to see if the AI system improves hemostasis efficiency:
- AI group: During ESD, the AI system will real-time spot and mark bleeding points. Doctors will use these marks to stop bleeding.
- Control group: Doctors will use the same equipment but without the AI system - they will find and stop bleeding using their own experience.
Participants will:
- Have ESD surgery for esophageal, stomach, or colorectal lesions that need this treatment;
- Be randomly assigned to either the AI group or the control group;
- Attend follow-up checks in 14 days after surgery to check for complications;
- Have their surgery videos reviewed by experts to record hemostasis time and total surgery time.
Study Overview
Status
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Zhen Li
- Phone Number: +86-18560086106
- Email: qilulizhen@sdu.edu.cn
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- Aged 18-80 years;
- Lesions meet the indications for ESD treatment of the esophagus, stomach, or colorectum according to relevant guidelines;
- Anticoagulant drugs have been suspended according to relevant guidelines;
- Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification Grade I or II;
- Patients who voluntarily sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with severe cardiopulmonary diseases, coagulation dysfunction or other severe comorbidities that may increase surgical risks;
- Patients undergoing dialysis treatment;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- Deemed unsuitable for participation in this study by the principal investigator or other researchers.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: AI-assisted Group
During the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure, an artificial intelligence (AI) real-time bleeding point recognition system is utilized.
The system dynamically analyzes endoscopic images to identify and mark bleeding sites in real time.
Endoscopists perform hemostatic operations promptly based on these AI-generated markers.
|
Patients undergo ESD with real-time AI assistance.
During the operation, the pre-trained and validated AI system continuously analyzes endoscopic images to automatically identify and mark active bleeding points in real time.
Endoscopists perform hemostatic operations (e.g., coagulation with hemostatic forceps or electrosurgical knives) based on the AI-generated marks to target bleeding sites promptly.
|
|
No Intervention: Conventional treatment group
Patients undergo ESD using the same hardware platform, but the AI system is deactivated.
Hemostatic decisions and operations are solely dependent on the endoscopists' clinical experience-they independently judge the location of bleeding points and perform hemostasis without AI assistance.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Average single hemostasis time
Time Frame: Periprocedural
|
Periprocedural
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of postoperative complications
Time Frame: 14 days post-procedure
|
Complications include intraoperative and postoperative perforation, damage to the muscularis propria, etc
|
14 days post-procedure
|
|
Total operation duration
Time Frame: Periprocedural
|
Periprocedural
|
|
|
Psychological stress experienced by the endoscopist
Time Frame: Periprocedural
|
Be evaluated subjectively on a five point scale
|
Periprocedural
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
- Diagnosis
- Surgical Procedures, Operative
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
- Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical
- Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
- Endoscopy, Digestive System
- Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System
- Endoscopy
- Digestive System Surgical Procedures
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2026SDU-QILU-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
-
University of FloridaRecruitingEndoscopic Submucosal DissectionUnited States
-
Hôpital Edouard HerriotCompleted
-
Anchora MedicalRecruitingEndoscopic Mucosal Resection | Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)Israel
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasNot yet recruitingColorectal Endoscopic Submucosal DissectionItaly
-
Germans Trias i Pujol HospitalCompletedEvaluation of the Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) on Advanced Endoscopic Resection TechniquesEndoscopic Submucosal Dissection | Platelet-rich Plasma | Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionSpain
-
Yonsei UniversityNot yet recruitingPatients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
-
Jilin UniversityRecruitingColorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection(ESD) SurgeryChina
-
Korea University Anam HospitalRecruitingSedation Complication | Esophagogastroduodenoscopy | Endoscopic Submucosal DissectionKorea, Republic of
-
Kaiyun LiuNot yet recruitingColorectal Lesions | Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) | FASTER Robot
-
Ningbo No. 1 HospitalNot yet recruitingEndoscopic Submucosal Dissection | Tracheal Intubation | Video Laryngoscope | Endoscopy-AssistedChina