The Improvement Effect of Real-time Artificial Intelligence Assisted Identification of Bleeding Points on Hemostasis Efficiency in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

March 22, 2026 updated by: Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

The Improvement Effect of Real-time Artificial Intelligence Assisted Identification of Bleeding Points on Hemostasis Efficiency in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD): a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if an artificial intelligence (AI) system that identifies bleeding points in real time can help stop bleeding faster during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) - a minimally invasive surgery for early digestive tract cancer or precancerous lesions. It will also learn about the AI system's effect on surgery-related problems (like perforation or delayed bleeding) and total surgery time.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does the AI system shorten the time it takes to stop each bleed during ESD?
  2. How does the AI system affect the rate of surgery-related problems and total surgery time?

Researchers will compare two groups to see if the AI system improves hemostasis efficiency:

  1. AI group: During ESD, the AI system will real-time spot and mark bleeding points. Doctors will use these marks to stop bleeding.
  2. Control group: Doctors will use the same equipment but without the AI system - they will find and stop bleeding using their own experience.

Participants will:

  1. Have ESD surgery for esophageal, stomach, or colorectal lesions that need this treatment;
  2. Be randomly assigned to either the AI group or the control group;
  3. Attend follow-up checks in 14 days after surgery to check for complications;
  4. Have their surgery videos reviewed by experts to record hemostasis time and total surgery time.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Aged 18-80 years;
  2. Lesions meet the indications for ESD treatment of the esophagus, stomach, or colorectum according to relevant guidelines;
  3. Anticoagulant drugs have been suspended according to relevant guidelines;
  4. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification Grade I or II;
  5. Patients who voluntarily sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Patients with severe cardiopulmonary diseases, coagulation dysfunction or other severe comorbidities that may increase surgical risks;
  2. Patients undergoing dialysis treatment;
  3. Pregnant or lactating women;
  4. Deemed unsuitable for participation in this study by the principal investigator or other researchers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AI-assisted Group
During the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure, an artificial intelligence (AI) real-time bleeding point recognition system is utilized. The system dynamically analyzes endoscopic images to identify and mark bleeding sites in real time. Endoscopists perform hemostatic operations promptly based on these AI-generated markers.
Patients undergo ESD with real-time AI assistance. During the operation, the pre-trained and validated AI system continuously analyzes endoscopic images to automatically identify and mark active bleeding points in real time. Endoscopists perform hemostatic operations (e.g., coagulation with hemostatic forceps or electrosurgical knives) based on the AI-generated marks to target bleeding sites promptly.
No Intervention: Conventional treatment group
Patients undergo ESD using the same hardware platform, but the AI system is deactivated. Hemostatic decisions and operations are solely dependent on the endoscopists' clinical experience-they independently judge the location of bleeding points and perform hemostasis without AI assistance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Average single hemostasis time
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of postoperative complications
Time Frame: 14 days post-procedure
Complications include intraoperative and postoperative perforation, damage to the muscularis propria, etc
14 days post-procedure
Total operation duration
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural
Psychological stress experienced by the endoscopist
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Be evaluated subjectively on a five point scale
Periprocedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Subscribe