- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07504146
The Orienting Study (ORIENTING)
The Natural History Of Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition And Gout: An Observational Clinical And Imaging Study - The Orienting Study
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
This is a monocentric observational longitudinal study in which patients diagnosed with gout or CPPD and disease-controls with OA will be consecutively recruited from the outpatient clinics of the Rheumatology and Orthopaedic Hip Departments of the IRCCS Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio Hospital.
The investigators will enroll consecutive patients with CPPD and gout and disease-controls with OA fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria, from the outpatient clinics of the Rheumatology Department and Orthopaedic Hip Department of the IRCCS Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, who will be seen for routine or urgent gout/CPPD/OA care following local scheduling processes, without applying any further selection criteria. All patients, in line with clinical routine practice, will undergo a standard clinical, laboratory and imaging assessment, both at baseline and during scheduled follow-up visits (every 6 months) and urgent follow-up visits, tailored to each patient's needs. The study comprises two phases. The first, aims to evaluate the extent of crystal deposition in joints and in blood vessels in patients with CPPD and gout. The second, focuses on monitoring the extension of crystals deposits, their associations with conventional therapies, and evaluating the development of cardiovascular complications in patients with CPPD and gout in comparison to disease-controls with OA. The data for the study will be retrieved from the medical records of the patients and recorded into an appositely created electronic case report form (CRF). The enrollment period will last 3 years (starting from the time of approval of the study), and the follow up period will last 10 years.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Georgios Filippou, MD
- Phone Number: 0039 0283502707
- Email: georgios.filippou@grupposandonato.it
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Silvia Sirotti, MD
- Phone Number: 0039 0283502708
- Email: silvia.sirotti@grupposandonato.it
Study Locations
-
-
Milano
-
Milan, Milano, Italy, 20157
- Recruiting
- IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
-
Contact:
- Alessandro Lucia
- Email: portaminchiesa@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
The inclusion criteria for CPPD patients are:
- Patients diagnosed with CPPD disease according to the ACR/EULAR 2023 classification criteria.
- Patients with evidence of asymptomatic CPPD on US or X-rays (not meeting the classification criteria) according to validated imaging definitions.
- Aged older than 18 years.
- Able to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee.
The inclusion criteria for gout patients are:
- Patients diagnosed with gout according to the ACR/EULAR 2015 classification criteria.
- Aged older than 18 years.
- Able to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee.
The inclusion criteria for disease controls are:
- A diagnosis of OA according to ACR classification criteria
- No evidence of uric acid or calcium pyrophosphate deposits on US
- Uric acid < 6 mg/dL
- Aged older than 18 years.
- Able to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee
The exclusion criteria for gout/CPPD patients are:
- Known history of other inflammatory arthropathies
- Unable to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee.
The exclusion criteria for disease controls are:
- Known history of other inflammatory arthropathies
- Unable to provide informed consent, according to requirements of local IRB/ethics committee.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Gout
Patients affected by gout according to ACR/EULAR classification criteria
|
|
CPPD
Patients affected by gout according to ACR/EULAR classification criteria
|
|
Disease control
Patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis according to ACR classification criteria
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Extent of CPP crystal deposition assessed by ultrasound over time
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition (CPPD) will be assessed using the OMERACT Ultrasound Scoring System for CPPD at patient level and at joint level.
Each anatomical site will be graded on a semi-quantitative scale from 0 to 3. According to the clinical scenario and the clinician decision, patients will undergo an US examination of the affected joints.
Case by case the following joints will be evaluated: shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, Achilles tendon, foot.
The total score will be calculated as the sum of scores across all evaluated sites and normalized by the number of sites assessed per patient.
The measure will be assessed longitudinally to evaluate changes in crystal deposition over time.
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Extent of MSU crystal deposition assessed by ultrasound over time
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Assessment of the extent of monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition Calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition (CPPD) will be assessed using the OMERACT Ultrasound Scoring System for Gout Lesions (double contour sign, tophi, aggregates).
Each lesion will be graded on a semi-quantitative scale from 0 to 3. A total score will be calculated by summing scores across all evaluated joints.
According to the clinical scenario and the clinician decision, patients will undergo an US examination of the affected joints.
Case by case the following joints will be evaluated: shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, Achilles tendon, foot.
The total score will be calculated as the sum of scores across all evaluated sites and normalized by the number of sites assessed per patient.
The measure will be assessed longitudinally to evaluate changes in crystal deposition over time.
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Progression of bone erosions assessed by ultrasound
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Bone erosions will be assessed using the OMERACT Ultrasound Scoring System for Bone Erosions.
Each site will be graded from 0 to 3 and summed across all evaluated joints to obtain a total erosion score.
The measure will be assessed longitudinally to evaluate changes over time.
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Progression of osteophites assessed by ultrasound
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Osteophytes will be assessed using the OMERACT Ultrasound Scoring System for Osteophytes.
Each site will be graded from 0 to 3 and summed across all evaluated joints to obtain a total osteophyte score.
The measure will be assessed longitudinally to evaluate changes over time.
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
ESR
Time Frame: From baseline every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR mm/h) between patients with CPPD and gout and disease-controls with OA
|
From baseline every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
CRP
Time Frame: From baseline every 6 months up to ten years
|
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP mg/L) between CPPD and Gout patients and controls with OA
|
From baseline every 6 months up to ten years
|
|
Synovitis Score Assessed by Global OMERACT-EULAR Synovitis Score (GLOESS)
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Synovitis will be evaluated thanks to Global OMERACT-EULAR Synovitis Score (GLOESS).
Ultrasound evaluation will be performed on clinically relevant joints and anatomical structures as determined by the treating physician.
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Tenosynovitis Score Assessed by OMERACT Ultrasound Scoring System
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Tenosynovitis will be assessed using the OMERACT ultrasound scoring system on a semi-quantitative scale.
Ultrasound evaluation will be performed on clinically relevant joints and anatomical structures as determined by the treating physician.
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Joint Effusion Score Assessed by Ultrasound
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Joint effusion will be assessed using ultrasound on a semi-quantitative scale from 0 to 3. The joints to be evaluated will be selected according to the clinician's judgement
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Number of Tender Joints Assessed Using 68-Joint Count
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
The number of tender joints will be assessed using the 68-joint count method.
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Number of Swollen Joints Assessed Using 66-Joint Count
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
The number of swollen joints will be assessed using the 66-joint count method.
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Disease activity will be assessed by the physician using a visual analog scale (0-100)
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Scale (0-100)
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Patient-Reported Pain Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Scale (0-100)
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Patient-Reported Global Health Status
Time Frame: Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
Scale (0-100)
|
Baseline and every 6 months up to 10 years
|
|
Functional Disability Assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)
Time Frame: From baseline every six months up to ten years
|
Score (0-3) for every item of the questionnaire, then the sum is calculated
|
From baseline every six months up to ten years
|
|
Cardiovascular Risk Assessed by SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP
Time Frame: At baseline and if clinically indicated during follow-up up to ten years
|
Cardiovascular risk will be estimated using SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP algorithms, depending on patient's age.
Both scores express a percentage (%) of the 10-year risk.
|
At baseline and if clinically indicated during follow-up up to ten years
|
|
Incidence of Cardiovascular Events
Time Frame: During the 10 years follow up
|
Occurrence of cardiovascular events recorded during follow-up (Number of events / % of patients)
|
During the 10 years follow up
|
|
Distribution of Clinical Phenotypes of CPPD and Gout
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Phenotypes of calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease and gout will be classified according to established classification criteria (ACR/EULAR recommendations and G-CAN consensus respectively).
|
Baseline
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Serum suPAR Levels Assessed by Enzyme Immunoassay
Time Frame: Once during the 10 years follow up
|
Serum soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels will be measured using an ELISA-based assay on blood and/or synovial fluid, whenever the patients undergo arthrocentesis for other reasons
|
Once during the 10 years follow up
|
|
Intima media thickness at ultrasound of carothid arteries
Time Frame: As clinically indicated during follow-up up to ten years from baseline
|
Measurment of intima-media thickness (CMIT) at ultrasound of carothid arteries performed as part of routine care will be collected to assess increased atherosclerotic risk.
The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) often highlights CMIT> 0.9 as a critical threshold to determine an increased risk
|
As clinically indicated during follow-up up to ten years from baseline
|
|
Assessment of joint damage using X-ray, CT or MRI
Time Frame: As clinically indicated during follow-up from baseline up to ten years
|
On radiographs and CT, osteoarthritis severity will be evaluated based on osteophytes, joint space narrowing, and subchondral bone changes, using a semi-quantitative grading scale (e.g., Kellgren-Lawrence grade 0-4 for radiographs).
On MRI, joint damage will be assessed including cartilage integrity and other structural abnormalities using appropriate semi-quantitative scoring systems (WORMS, MOAKS)
|
As clinically indicated during follow-up from baseline up to ten years
|
|
Histological and Molecular Characteristics of Joint Tissues in Patients Undergoing Arthroplasty
Time Frame: At time of surgery (as applicable)
|
Biological samples (bone, cartilage, synovial membrane, ligaments/tendons, synovial fluid) collected during clinically indicated arthroplasty procedures will be analyzed using histology, immunohistochemistry, and Raman spectroscopy to assess tissue morphology, inflammatory features, and crystal deposition.
|
At time of surgery (as applicable)
|
|
Coronary stenosis at Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA)
Time Frame: As clinically indicated during follow up up to ten years
|
The presence of coronary stenosis at Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) will be recorded.
An obstructive stenosis occupies more than 50% of the lumen.
|
As clinically indicated during follow up up to ten years
|
|
Assessment of bone mineral density at DEXA
Time Frame: As clinically indicated from baseline up to ten years follow up
|
Bone mineral density (BMD) will be measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine and proximal femur.
Results will be expressed in g/cm², T-scores, and Z-scores.
Bone status will be classified as normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis according to World Health Organization criteria.
|
As clinically indicated from baseline up to ten years follow up
|
|
Evaluation of CPP crystal and MSU crystal deposition at X-ray, TC or MRI
Time Frame: As clinically indicated from baseline up to ten years follow up
|
CPP and MSU crystal deposition in articular or periarticular structures at other imaging modalities (X-rays, CT scans, MRI) will be qualitatively assessed and documented as presence/absence.
|
As clinically indicated from baseline up to ten years follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Georgios Filippou, MD, Università degli Studi di Milano / IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039-49. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816.
- Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Gray R, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hand. Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Nov;33(11):1601-10. doi: 10.1002/art.1780331101.
- Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Feldman D, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 May;34(5):505-14. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340502.
- Moller I, Janta I, Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Bong DA, Martinoli C, Filippucci E, Sconfienza LM, Terslev L, Damjanov N, Hammer HB, Sudol-Szopinska I, Grassi W, Balint P, Bruyn GAW, D'Agostino MA, Hollander D, Siddle HJ, Supp G, Schmidt WA, Iagnocco A, Koski J, Kane D, Fodor D, Bruns A, Mandl P, Kaeley GS, Micu M, Ho C, Vlad V, Chavez-Lopez M, Filippou G, Ceron CE, Nestorova R, Quintero M, Wakefield R, Carmona L, Naredo E. The 2017 EULAR standardised procedures for ultrasound imaging in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Dec;76(12):1974-1979. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211585. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
- Horta-Baas G. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Key Consideration for Evaluating Biosimilar Uptake? Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2022 Mar 30;13:79-95. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S256715. eCollection 2022.
- Duarte-Garcia A, Leung YY, Coates LC, Beaton D, Christensen R, Craig ET, de Wit M, Eder L, Fallon L, FitzGerald O, Gladman DD, Goel N, Holland R, Lindsay C, Maxwell L, Mease P, Orbai AM, Shea B, Strand V, Veale DJ, Tillett W, Ogdie A. Endorsement of the 66/68 Joint Count for the Measurement of Musculoskeletal Disease Activity: OMERACT 2018 Psoriatic Arthritis Workshop Report. J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;46(8):996-1005. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181089. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
- SCORE2-OP working group and ESC Cardiovascular risk collaboration. SCORE2-OP risk prediction algorithms: estimating incident cardiovascular event risk in older persons in four geographical risk regions. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 1;42(25):2455-2467. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab312.
- SCORE2 working group and ESC Cardiovascular risk collaboration. SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 1;42(25):2439-2454. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab309.
- Naredo E, D'Agostino MA, Wakefield RJ, Moller I, Balint PV, Filippucci E, Iagnocco A, Karim Z, Terslev L, Bong DA, Garrido J, Martinez-Hernandez D, Bruyn GA; OMERACT Ultrasound Task Force*. Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound score for tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Aug;72(8):1328-34. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202092. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
- Abhishek A, Tedeschi SK, Pascart T, Latourte A, Dalbeth N, Neogi T, Fuller A, Rosenthal A, Becce F, Bardin T, Ea HK, Filippou G, Fitzgerald J, Iagnocco A, Liote F, McCarthy GM, Ramonda R, Richette P, Sivera F, Andres M, Cipolletta E, Doherty M, Pascual E, Perez-Ruiz F, So A, Jansen TL, Kohler MJ, Stamp LK, Yinh J, Adinolfi A, Arad U, Aung T, Benillouche E, Bortoluzzi A, Dau J, Maningding E, Fang MA, Figus FA, Filippucci E, Haslett J, Janssen M, Kaldas M, Kimoto M, Leamy K, Navarro GM, Sarzi-Puttini P, Scire C, Silvagni E, Sirotti S, Stack JR, Truong L, Xie C, Yokose C, Hendry AM, Terkeltaub R, Taylor WJ, Choi HK. The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Oct;82(10):1248-1257. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224575. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
- Tedeschi SK, Huang W, Yoshida K, Solomon DH. Risk of cardiovascular events in patients having had acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Aug 11;81(9):1323-1329. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222387.
- Hammer HB, Iagnocco A, Mathiessen A, Filippucci E, Gandjbakhch F, Kortekaas MC, Moller I, Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, Aegerter P, D'Agostino MA. Global ultrasound assessment of structural lesions in osteoarthritis: a reliability study by the OMERACT ultrasonography group on scoring cartilage and osteophytes in finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Feb;75(2):402-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206289. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
- Sirotti S, Becce F, Sconfienza LM, Terslev L, Naredo E, Zufferey P, Pineda C, Gutierrez M, Adinolfi A, Serban T, MacCarter D, Mouterde G, Zanetti A, Scanu A, Moller I, Novo-Rivas U, Largo R, Sarzi-Puttini P, Abhishek A, Choi HK, Dalbeth N, Pascart T, Tedeschi SK, D'Agostino MA, Iagnocco A, Keen HI, Scire CA, Filippou G. Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiography for the Diagnosis of Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition: Performance of the Novel Definitions Developed by an International Multidisciplinary Working Group. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023 Apr;75(4):630-638. doi: 10.1002/art.42368. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
- Wang Y, Deng X, Zhang X, Geng Y, Ji L, Song Z, Zhang Z. Presence of tophi and carotid plaque were risk factors of MACE in subclinical artherosclerosis patients with gout: a longitudinal cohort study. Front Immunol. 2023 Apr 18;14:1151782. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1151782. eCollection 2023.
- Dalbeth N, Gosling AL, Gaffo A, Abhishek A. Gout. Lancet. 2021 May 15;397(10287):1843-1855. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00569-9. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
- Bashir M, Sherman KA, Solomon DH, Rosenthal A, Tedeschi SK. Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease: A Nationwide Study of Veterans. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023 Feb;75(2):277-282. doi: 10.1002/acr.24783. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
- Salaffi F, De Angelis R, Grassi W; MArche Pain Prevalence; INvestigation Group (MAPPING) study. Prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions in an Italian population sample: results of a regional community-based study. I. The MAPPING study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Nov-Dec;23(6):819-28.
- Christiansen SN, Filippou G, Scire CA, Balint PV, Bruyn GA, Dalbeth N, Dejaco C, Sedie AD, Filippucci E, Hammer HB, Iagnocco A, Keen HI, Kissin EY, Koski J, Mandl P, Martin J, Miguel E, Moller I, Naredo E, Pineda C, Schmidt WA, Stewart S, Antonietta D'Agostino M, Terslev L; on the behalf of the OMERACT Ultrasound working group. Consensus-based semi-quantitative ultrasound scoring system for gout lesions: Results of an OMERACT Delphi process and web-reliability exercise. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Jun;51(3):644-649. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.11.011. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Crystal Arthropathies
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Arthritis
- Joint Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Purine-Pyrimidine Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Metabolism, Inborn Errors
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Metabolic Diseases
- Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
- Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
- Gout
- Osteoarthritis
- Chondrocalcinosis
Other Study ID Numbers
- ORIENTING L4181
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gout
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruiting
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruiting
-
AmgenRecruiting
-
Innovent Biologics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.Active, not recruiting
-
Atom Therapeutics Co., LtdRecruitingGout Flare | Acute Gouty Arthritis | Gout Flares | Acute Gout FlareChina, United States, Australia
-
Guangdong Hengqin Novagains Biopharmaceutical Co...Xiangbei Welman Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; Guangzhou Xin-Chuangyi Biopharmaceutical...Not yet recruitingHyperuricemia With or Without GoutChina
-
Guangdong Hengqin Novagains Biopharmaceutical Co...Xiangbei Welman Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; Guangzhou Xin-Chuangyi Biopharmaceutical...Enrolling by invitationHyperuricemia With or Without GoutChina
-
Örebro University, SwedenRecruitingHyperuricemia With or Without GoutSweden
-
SingHealth PolyclinicsNot yet recruitingGout Flare | Gout; Hyperuricemia | Gout ChronicSingapore
-
Atom Therapeutics Co., LtdCompletedGout | Gout Flares | Acute Gout FlareUnited States