- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07506304
Biological Potentials in Arthroscopic All-inside Semitendinosus Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (BioACL)
A Double-blind, Randomized, Prospective, Single-center Study of Biological Potentials in Arthroscopic All-inside Semitendinosus Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction outcomes depend on multiple factors including surgical technique, graft selection, fixation methods, and rehabilitation. Hamstring tendon autografts are commonly used due to favorable biomechanical properties and low donor-site morbidity. Traditionally, graft preparation involves complete removal of muscle tissue; however, emerging techniques such as the "candy stripe" method preserve residual muscle, which may provide a source of stem cells and enhance biological healing.
In addition, biological augmentation strategies-including the use of autologous bone graft and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF)-have been proposed to improve tendon-to-bone integration and accelerate ligamentization. These approaches aim to enhance graft incorporation, structural integrity, and overall functional recovery.
This study is a double-blind, randomized, prospective, single-center clinical trial including 70 patients with ACL rupture. Participants are randomly assigned into two groups (n=35 per group):
A control group undergoing standard all-inside ACL reconstruction. An intervention group undergoing biologically augmented ACL reconstruction.
All procedures are performed using an all-inside technique with semitendinosus tendon autografts. The biologically augmented group differs by:
Preservation of a thin layer of muscle tissue on the graft (candy stripe technique) Use of autologous cancellous bone collected during tunnel drilling Application of autologous fibrin glue (platelet-rich fibrin) combined with bone graft to enhance healing at graft-tunnel interfaces The primary objective is to evaluate whether biological augmentation improves graft healing and clinical outcomes compared to standard reconstruction.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Marin Glavčić, MD
- Phone Number: Marin Glavčić , MD +385 1
- Email: mglavcic@kbd.hr
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinically and radiologically confirmed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture.
- Age between 18 and 50 years.
- Intact posterior cruciate ligament and collateral ligaments.
- Signed informed consent to participate in the study.
- Patients meeting at least one indication for concomitant lateral tenodesis, including: age under 25 years, positive pivot-shift test, presence of Segond fracture, participation in sports with frequent changes of direction and rotational knee loads, or joint hypermobility (Beighton score ≥ 7).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous ACL reconstruction of the same knee.
- Inability to use a graft prepared by quadruple folding of the semitendinosus tendon.
- Graft diameter < 7.5 mm.
- MRI-confirmed unsuccessful meniscal healing after repair.
- Acute joint infection or history of joint infection.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard ACL Reconstruction (Control Group)
Standard all-inside ACL reconstruction with internal brace augmentation Patients undergo arthroscopic all-inside ACL reconstruction using a quadrupled semitendinosus tendon autograft.
The graft is prepared using standard techniques.
Fixation is achieved using suspensory fixation devices and internal brace augmentation.
No biological augmentation is applied.
|
Participants will undergo arthroscopic all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an autologous semitendinosus graft.
In the experimental intervention, a biologically augmented graft is used, including preservation of muscle tissue on the tendon (candy stripe technique) and application of autologous cancellous bone combined with platelet-rich fibrin at the graft-bone interface.
In the control intervention, a standard tendon-only graft is used without biological augmentation.
In both groups, graft configuration, tunnel creation, fixation technique, and surgical protocol are identical, and all procedures are performed by the same surgeon.
|
|
Active Comparator: Biologically Augmented ACL Reconstruction (Experimental Group)
Biologically augmented all-inside ACL reconstruction Patients undergo arthroscopic all-inside ACL reconstruction using a semitendinosus tendon autograft with biological augmentation. The procedure includes: Preservation of a thin layer of muscle tissue on the tendon graft (candy stripe technique) Collection of autologous cancellous bone during tunnel drilling Preparation of autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) from peripheral blood Creation of a composite graft using autologous bone mixed with fibrin glue Application of the biological composite material into femoral and tibial sockets to enhance graft integration Fixation is performed using standard suspensory devices consistent with the control group. |
Participants will undergo arthroscopic all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an autologous semitendinosus graft.
In the experimental intervention, a biologically augmented graft is used, including preservation of muscle tissue on the tendon (candy stripe technique) and application of autologous cancellous bone combined with platelet-rich fibrin at the graft-bone interface.
In the control intervention, a standard tendon-only graft is used without biological augmentation.
In both groups, graft configuration, tunnel creation, fixation technique, and surgical protocol are identical, and all procedures are performed by the same surgeon.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
SNQ
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months postoperatively
|
To analyze and compare T2 signal-to-noise ratio values on magnetic resonance imaging at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months postoperatively within and between the two study groups.
The SNQ is calculated as the ratio of the graft T2 signal intensity to the signal intensity of a reference tissue on MRI.
Higher SNQ values indicate higher graft signal, which corresponds to lower graft maturity/quality.
Scale: Continuous numerical value (exact values depend on MRI signal calibration).
|
6 weeks, 6 and 12 months postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Bone Tunnel Diameter
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months postoperatively
|
The diameter of the femoral and tibial bone tunnel measured on MRI at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared to the intraoperatively drilled diameter.
Units: Millimeters (mm) Directionality: Higher values indicate tunnel widening
|
6 and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Knee Stability - Anterior Tibial Translation
Time Frame: 12 months postoperatively
|
The anterior-posterior stability of the operated knee measured with the Lachmeter device at 12 months postoperatively.
Units: Millimeters (mm) of anterior tibial translation Directionality: Higher values indicate greater laxity (worse stability)
|
12 months postoperatively
|
|
KOOS - Pain Subscale
Time Frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain subscale, assessing knee pain.
Scale: 0-100 (0 = extreme pain, 100 = no pain; higher scores = better outcome)
|
Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
|
KOOS - Symptoms Subscale
Time Frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
KOOS - Symptoms subscale, assessing knee symptoms (e.g., swelling, stiffness).
Scale: 0-100 (0 = severe symptoms, 100 = no symptoms; higher scores = better outcome)
|
Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
|
KOOS - Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Subscale
Time Frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
KOOS - ADL subscale, assessing functional ability in daily activities.
Scale: 0-100 (0 = extreme limitation, 100 = no limitation; higher scores = better outcome)
|
Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
|
KOOS - Sports/Recreation Subscale
Time Frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
KOOS - Sports/Recreation subscale, assessing function during sport or recreational activity.
Scale: 0-100 (0 = extreme limitation, 100 = no limitation; higher scores = better outcome)
|
Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
|
KOOS - Quality of Life (QoL) Subscale
Time Frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
KOOS - QoL subscale, assessing knee-related quality of life.
Scale: 0-100 (0 = extreme problem, 100 = no problem; higher scores = better outcome)
|
Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
|
KDC-SKF (International Knee Documentation Committee - Subjective Knee Form)
Time Frame: Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
Patient-reported measure of knee function, symptoms, and sports activity.
Scale: 0-100 (0 = worst knee function, 100 = best knee function; higher scores = better outcome)
|
Before surgery, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Rerupture rate
Time Frame: 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively
|
Rates of reruptures of ACL graft in operated patients
|
1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 024/0719-3
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cruciate Ligament Rupture
-
Alexander Rofner-MorettiRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryAustria
-
National Police HospitalCompletedRupture of Anterior Cruciate Ligament | Rupture of Posterior Cruciate LigamentKorea, Republic of
-
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction | Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury | Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) RuptureTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearTurkey
-
Sanford HealthActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverChildren's Hospital ColoradoActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearUnited States
-
eMKa MED Medical CenterWroclaw Medical UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Knee Injuries | Knee Ligament InjuryPoland
-
Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung HospitalNot yet recruitingPosterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | PCL - Posterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | PCL - Posterior Cruciate Ligament DeficiencyChina
-
The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearUnited States
-
Artromedical Konrad Malinowski ClinicRecruitingAnalysis of Radiological Features of Lateral Femoral Impaction Fracture / Lateral Femoral Notch SignAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearPoland
Clinical Trials on ACL reconstruction
-
Lars KonradsenUnknown
-
Samsun UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Cairo UniversityKasr Al-Ainy HospitalsCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryEgypt
-
Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical...Enrolling by invitationAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesPortugal
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryEgypt
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...RecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesChina
-
Larissa University HospitalUniversity of ThessalyRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesGreece
-
Chunyan JiangStar Sports Medicine Co., LtdNot yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament
-
Schulthess KlinikRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament TearSwitzerland
-
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, BellinzonaClinical Trial Unit Ente Ospedaliero CantonaleCompletedComplete Tear, Knee, Anterior Cruciate LigamentItaly, Switzerland