- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07515118
AI-TOP Study Artificial Intelligence for Trigger Optimization. (AI-TOP)
An Artificial Intelligence Based Approach for Selecting the Optimal Day for Triggering.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Assisted Reproductive Technology is undergoing a major transformation with the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI), which is reshaping how medical treatments are carried out. In IVF, one of the persistent challenges has been maximizing the number of oocytes retrieved while efficiently managing clinical workload-particularly by reducing weekend procedures-without compromising outcomes. Although a patient's response may vary between cycles, evidence shows that adjusting the trigger day by one day does not significantly affect clinical results, enabling more flexible scheduling.
AI enables a shift from standardized protocols to personalized treatments, improving clinical outcomes, streamlining processes and enhancing operational efficiency. Recent research shows that AI-based models can optimize ovarian stimulation, improve trigger-day selection, and increase the number of fertilized oocytes compared to decisions made solely by physicians. AI algorithms have also accurately predicted the number of oocytes retrieved, contributing to more effective protocols and higher live birth rates.
Beyond trigger timing, AI has been shown to improve workflow efficiency in IVF clinics by optimizing monitoring schedules and balancing clinical workload without negatively affecting cycle outcomes.
Based on this growing evidence, a randomized controlled trial was designed to compare clinical outcomes of controlled ovarian stimulation when trigger and retrieval decisions are made solely by the physician versus when the physician is assisted by AI guidance.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08028
- Recruiting
- Hospital Universitario Quiron Dexeus
-
Contact:
- Nikolaos P Polyzos, MD PhD
- Phone Number: 0034932274700
- Email: nikpol@dexeus.com
-
Contact:
- Ignacio Rodriguez, MSc
- Phone Number: 0034932274700
- Email: nacrod@dexeus.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Nikolaos P Polyzos, MD PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Valeria Donno, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Mariana B Miguens, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Gerarda Gaeta, MD
-
Tarragona, Spain, 43206
- Not yet recruiting
- Dexeus Mujer Tarragona
-
Contact:
- Josep Gonzalo, MD
- Email: josgon@dexeus.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Josep Gonzalo, MD
-
-
Barcelona
-
Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
- Not yet recruiting
- Dexeus Mujer Sabadell
-
Contact:
- Ainhoa Coco, MD
- Phone Number: 0034932274700
- Email: aincoc@dexeus.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ainhoa Coco, MD
-
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain, 08195
- Not yet recruiting
- Dexeus Mujer Sant Cugat
-
Contact:
- Ainhoa Coco, MD
- Phone Number: 0034932274700
- Email: aincoc@dexeus.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Ainhoa Coco, MD
-
-
Tarragona
-
Reus, Tarragona, Spain, 43202
- Not yet recruiting
- Dexeus Mujer Reus
-
Contact:
- Josep Gonzalo, MD
- Email: josgon@dexeus.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Josep Gonzalo, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Undergoing COS for IVF with autologous oocytes, oocyte donation and elective fertility preservation with all monitoring USS (ultrasound scan) conducted at our centers.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medically indicated fertility preservation
- Inability to attend clinic visits for monitoring.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: AI Algorithm
Trigger decisions trigger will be made by the physician assisted by AI guidance.
|
The AI algorithm used in this study is STIMAI®.
STIMAI® is an artificial intelligence-based software that assists clinicians by providing data-driven insights to optimize the fertility treatment process and support conception.
The software is designed as a clinical decision support tool and does not replace the physician's judgment; final clinical decisions will remain under the responsibility of the treating physician The physician will consult the AI application, which predicts the number of MII oocytes for different trigger days.
If the algorithm recommends triggering today or tomorrow, the physician will choose which option to follow.
|
|
Active Comparator: Routine clinical management
Following routine clinical management with ovulation trigger decisions made by the physician alone,
|
As soon as 2-3 follicles of 17 mm are detected, the physician will determine the timing of ovulation triggering based on clinical judgment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
MII oocytes
Time Frame: Day of pickup approx. 34-36 hours after ovulation trigger.
|
Number of MII oocytes retrieved at oocyte pickup.
|
Day of pickup approx. 34-36 hours after ovulation trigger.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Distribution of retrieval procedures during the week.
Time Frame: Assessed at the end of the stimulation cycle, once the retrieval schedule is completed. approx. 34-36 hours after ovulation trigger.
|
: The pattern or spread of oocyte retrieval procedures across the days of the week during an IVF cycle.
|
Assessed at the end of the stimulation cycle, once the retrieval schedule is completed. approx. 34-36 hours after ovulation trigger.
|
|
Number of COCs
Time Frame: Measured on the day of oocyte retrieval. approx. 34-36 hours after ovulation trigger.
|
The total number of oocytes surrounded by cumulus cells retrieved during the oocyte pick-up procedure, reflecting ovarian response to stimulation.
|
Measured on the day of oocyte retrieval. approx. 34-36 hours after ovulation trigger.
|
|
Length of stimulation (days)
Time Frame: From the first day of stimulation until the day the ovulation trigger is administered. Up to 8-15 days
|
The total number of days a patient receives gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation before triggering ovulation.
|
From the first day of stimulation until the day the ovulation trigger is administered. Up to 8-15 days
|
|
FORT (pre-ovulatory follicles on trigger day/AFC)
Time Frame: AFC is measured at baseline (cycle day 2-3); pre-ovulatory follicles are counted on trigger day. Up to 8-15 days
|
A measure of follicular responsiveness calculated as the number of pre-ovulatory follicles on trigger day divided by the baseline antral follicle count (AFC).
It reflects the efficiency of stimulation in growing recruitable follicles.
|
AFC is measured at baseline (cycle day 2-3); pre-ovulatory follicles are counted on trigger day. Up to 8-15 days
|
|
FOI (N COCs/AFC)
Time Frame: AFC measured at baseline; COCs counted on the day of retrieval approx. 34-36 hours after ovulation trigger.
|
The number of cumulus-oocyte complexes retrieved divided by the baseline antral follicle count (AFC), indicating how effectively baseline follicles resulted in retrieved oocytes.
|
AFC measured at baseline; COCs counted on the day of retrieval approx. 34-36 hours after ovulation trigger.
|
|
Number of visits
Time Frame: Counted from the start of stimulation until the trigger day. up to 8-12 days
|
The total number of in-clinic monitoring visits required during controlled ovarian stimulation, including ultrasound assessments and blood tests.
|
Counted from the start of stimulation until the trigger day. up to 8-12 days
|
|
Spontaneous ovulation
Time Frame: Detected between the trigger administration and the planned oocyte retrieval. approx. 34-36 hours after ovulation trigger.
|
Occurrence of unintended follicular rupture before oocyte retrieval, indicating that ovulation happened prior to the scheduled procedure despite monitoring.
|
Detected between the trigger administration and the planned oocyte retrieval. approx. 34-36 hours after ovulation trigger.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Blockeel C, Engels S, De Vos M, Haentjens P, Polyzos NP, Stoop D, Camus M, Devroey P. Oestradiol valerate pretreatment in GnRH-antagonist cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Mar;24(3):272-80. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.11.012. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
- Babayev E. Man versus machine in in vitro fertilization-can artificial intelligence replace physicians? Fertil Steril. 2020 Nov;114(5):963. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.042. Epub 2020 Aug 17. No abstract available.
- Canon C, Leibner L, Fanton M, Chang Z, Suraj V, Lee JA, Loewke K, Hoffman D. Optimizing oocyte yield utilizing a machine learning model for dose and trigger decisions, a multi-center, prospective study. Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 20;14(1):18721. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69165-1.
- Chow DJX, Wijesinghe P, Dholakia K, Dunning KR. Does artificial intelligence have a role in the IVF clinic? Reprod Fertil. 2021 Aug 23;2(3):C29-C34. doi: 10.1530/RAF-21-0043. eCollection 2021 Jul.
- Dimitriadis I, Zaninovic N, Badiola AC, Bormann CL. Artificial intelligence in the embryology laboratory: a review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Mar;44(3):435-448. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
- Ferrand T, Boulant J, He C, Chambost J, Jacques C, Pena CA, Hickman C, Reignier A, Freour T. Predicting the number of oocytes retrieved from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with machine learning. Hum Reprod. 2023 Oct 3;38(10):1918-1926. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead163.
- Hariton E, Chi EA, Chi G, Morris JR, Braatz J, Rajpurkar P, Rosen M. A machine learning algorithm can optimize the day of trigger to improve in vitro fertilization outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2021 Nov;116(5):1227-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
- Letterie G, MacDonald A, Shi Z. An artificial intelligence platform to optimize workflow during ovarian stimulation and IVF: process improvement and outcome-based predictions. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Feb;44(2):254-260. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- FSD-AIG-2025-20
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Infertility
-
Assuta Hospital SystemsMaccabi Healthcare Services, IsraelCompletedInfertility, Female Infertility, Male InfertilityIsrael
-
Radboud University Medical CenterZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentCompletedPregnancy | Male Infertility | Female InfertilityNetherlands
-
Sapientiae InstituteTerminated
-
Esraa Gamal AhmedAin Shams Maternity HospitalUnknownUnexplained Female Infertility
-
King's College LondonNot yet recruitingInfertility | Infertility, Female | Infertility Unexplained | Infertility of Tubal Origin
-
University of WashingtonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedMale Infertility, AzoospermiaUnited States
-
Pacific Fertility CenterTerminatedPrimary Female Infertility | Secondary Female Infertility
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedMale Infertility | Unexplained Infertility
-
Viable BiosciencesEnrolling by invitationInfertility (IVF Patients) | Infertility Assisted Reproductive TechnologyUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityNot yet recruitingMale Infertility | Unexplained Infertility | Sperm DNA Fragmentation
Clinical Trials on STIMAI®.
-
Galderma R&DCompletedAtopic DermatitisPhilippines, China
-
Dong-A ST Co., Ltd.CompletedFunctional DyspepsiaKorea, Republic of
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalCompleted
-
Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi CompanyCompletedPertussis | Diphtheria | PolioUnited States
-
Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University...UnknownFunctional DyspepsiaKorea, Republic of
-
Amir AzarpazhoohInstitut Straumann AGCompletedPeriodontal Inflammation | Crown LengtheningCanada
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD)Argentina
-
GuerbetCompletedPrimary Brain TumorColombia, Korea, Republic of, United States, Mexico
-
Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi CompanyCompletedPertussisUnited States