A Study Comparing JNJ-79635322 and Teclistamab in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (TRIlogy-5)

May 7, 2026 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing JNJ-79635322 Versus Teclistamab in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma After 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy, Including an Anti-CD38 Antibody and Lenalidomide

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well JNJ-79635322 works when compared with teclistamab.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

700

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) as defined by the criteria below: a. MM diagnosis according to the international myeloma working group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria, b. Measurable disease at screening as assessed by central laboratory
  • Received 1 to 3 prior lines of antimyeloma therapy, including an anti-cluster of differentiation (CD) 38 antibody and lenalidomide
  • Have an eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2 at screening and immediately before the first dose of study medication
  • Have clinical laboratory values meeting the criteria specified in the protocol during the screening and within 1 day of the start of administration of study treatment

Exclusion criteria:

  • Major surgery, (for example, requiring general anesthesia) or significant traumatic injury within 2 weeks prior to first dose, or will not have fully recovered from surgery, or has surgery planned during the time the participant is expected to participate in the study
  • Suspected or known allergies, hypersensitivity, intolerance or other contraindications to the use of JNJ-79635322 or teclistamab or their excipients
  • Presence of any of the following: i. Any ongoing myelodysplastic syndrome or B-cell malignancy (other than MM); ii. Any history of malignancy, other than MM, that is considered at high risk of recurrence requiring systemic therapy; iii. Any active malignancy (that is, progressing or requiring treatment change in the last 24 months) other than MM
  • Known active or prior central nervous system (CNS) involvement or exhibits clinical signs of meningeal involvement of MM. If either is suspected, negative whole brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lumbar cytology are required

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A: JNJ-79635322
Participants will receive subcutaneous (SC) dose of JNJ-79635322 treatment of a finite duration or intolerable toxicity (whichever is first).
JNJ-79635322 will be administered as SC injection.
Active Comparator: Arm B: Teclistamab
Participants will receive teclistamab as a SC injection until PD or intolerable toxicity.
Teclistamab will be administered as SC injection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete Response (CR) or Better
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
CR or better is defined as the percentage of participants achieving CR or stringent complete response (sCR) prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy in accordance with the international myeloma working group (IMWG) criteria during or after the study treatment.
Up to approximately 41 months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
PFS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to either progressive disease (PD) or death, whichever comes first. Disease progression will be determined according to the IMWG response criteria.
Up to approximately 41 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve partial response (PR) or better prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy in accordance with the IMWG criteria.
Up to approximately 41 months
Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
VGPR or better is defined as the percentage of participants achieving VGPR, CR, or sCR prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy in accordance with the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment.
Up to approximately 41 months
Duration of Response (DoR)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
DoR is defined as the time interval between the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease according to the IMWG response criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Up to approximately 41 months
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-negative CR
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
MRD-negative CR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR or better who achieve MRD-negative status, as determined by next-generation flow cytometry (NGF), at any time point after randomization and prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy.
Up to approximately 41 months
MRD-negative CR at 1 Year
Time Frame: At 1 Year
MRD-negative CR at 1 year is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve MRD-negative status at 12 months as determined by NGF, prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy and who also achieve CR or better according to IMWG criteria.
At 1 Year
MRD-negative CR at 5 Years
Time Frame: At 5 Years
MRD-negative CR at 5 years is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve MRD-negative status at 5 years as determined by NGF, prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy and who also achieve CR or better according to IMWG criteria.
At 5 Years
Progression-Free Survival on the First Subsequent Line of Antimyeloma Therapy (PFS2)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
PFS2 is defined as the time interval between the date of randomization and date of event, which is defined as progressive disease as assessed by investigator on the first subsequent line of antimyeloma therapy, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Those who are alive and for whom a second disease progression has not been observed are censored at the last date of follow-up.
Up to approximately 41 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death due to any cause.
Up to approximately 41 months
Time To Next Line of Therapy (TTNT)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
TTNT is defined as the time from randomization to the start of subsequent antimyeloma treatment. Death due to progressive disease without the start of any subsequent antimyeloma therapy will be considered as an event.
Up to approximately 41 months
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Severity
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. Any new or worsening AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study treatment through the day of last dose plus 30 days or prior to the start of subsequent anticancer therapy will be considered treatment-related regardless of the start date of the event. TEAEs will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 6.0. Severity scale ranges from Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening, Grade 5= death related to adverse event.
Up to approximately 41 months
Number of Participants with Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
Number of participants with abnormalities in laboratory parameters (serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis) will be reported.
Up to approximately 41 months
Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Symptoms and Functioning using the Multiple Myeloma Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (MySIm-Q) Scale Scores
Time Frame: From Baseline up to approximately 41 months
Change from baseline in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning as assessed by MySIm-Q score will be reported. The MySIm-Q is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment with established content validity for participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and newly diagnosed MM.
From Baseline up to approximately 41 months
Change from Baseline in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Scale Scores
Time Frame: From Baseline up to approximately 41 months
Change from baseline in symptoms, functioning, and HRQoL as assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 score will be reported.
From Baseline up to approximately 41 months
Change from Baseline in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Scale Scores
Time Frame: From Baseline up to approximately 41 months
The EQ-5D-5L is a generic measure of health status that contains 5-item questionnaire that assesses 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) plus a visual analog scale rating "health today" with anchors ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). The scores for the 5 dimensions are used to compute a single utility score, ranging from zero (0.0) to 1 (1.0), representing the general health status of the individual.
From Baseline up to approximately 41 months
Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the MySIm-Q Scale Scores
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
Time to worsening in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using the MySIm-Q scale scores will be reported. The MySIm-Q is a disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment with established content validity for participants with RRMM and newly diagnosed MM.
Up to approximately 41 months
Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Scale Scores
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
Time to worsening in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 score will be reported.
Up to approximately 41 months
Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning using the EQ-5D-5L Scale Scores
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
The EQ-5D-5L is a generic measure of health status that contains 5-item questionnaire that assesses 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) plus a visual analog scale rating "health today" with anchors ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). The scores for the 5 dimensions are used to compute a single utility score, ranging from zero (0.0) to 1 (1.0), representing the general health status of the individual.
Up to approximately 41 months
Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the MySIm-Q Scale Scores
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
The MySIm-Q is a disease-specific PRO assessment with established content validity for participants with RRMM and newly diagnosed MM.
Up to approximately 41 months
Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Scale Scores
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
Percentage of participants with meaningful improvement in symptoms, functioning, and HRQoL as assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 score will be reported.
Up to approximately 41 months
Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EQ-5D-5L Scale Scores
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
The EQ-5D-5L is a generic measure of health status that contains 5-item questionnaire that assesses 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) plus a visual analog scale rating "health today" with anchors ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). The scores for the 5 dimensions are used to compute a single utility score, ranging from zero (0.0) to 1 (1.0), representing the general health status of the individual.
Up to approximately 41 months
Percentage of Participants who Report Side Effects Burden on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Item List (EORTC IL) 46
Time Frame: Up to approximately 41 months
The EORTC IL46 consists of one single question that measures global impression of burden due to treatment-related symptoms. The response options range from "not at all" to "very much" on a 4-point scale.
Up to approximately 41 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 8, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 29, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 8, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data sharing policy of Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine is available at innovativemedicine.jnj.com/our-innovation/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on JNJ-79635322

Subscribe