A Study of Lebrikizumab in Adults With Nummular Eczema (LUMINE)

May 13, 2026 updated by: Almirall, S.A.

A Phase 3, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicentre Study With a Double-Blind Extension Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab Administered to Adult Patients With Nummular Eczema Who Are Not Adequately Controlled With Topical Corticosteroids or When This Treatment is Not Medically Advisable (LUMINE)

The main aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lebrikizumab treatment in adult participants with Nummular Eczema (NE) who are not adequately controlled with Topical corticosteroids (TCS) or when this treatment is not medically advisable.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

270

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants eligible for inclusion in this trial must fulfil all inclusion criteria per protocol, main criteria are listed below:

  • Ability to understand the purpose and risks of the trial, willingness and ability to comply with the protocol, and ability to provide written informed consent in accordance with institutional and regulatory guidelines.
  • Adult (aged 18 years or more at the time of Screening) diagnosed clinically with NE, as confirmed by the Investigator.
  • Presence of nummular eczema signs and/or symptoms for at least 6 months prior to Screening.
  • Investigator Global Assessment score >=3 at both Screening and Baseline/Day 1 visits.
  • In the judgement of the Investigator, having inadequate response to TCS.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants fulfilling any of the exclusion criteria per protocol are not eligible for inclusion in this trial main criteria are listed below:

  • Documented history or current presence of moderate-to-severe AD at the Screening visit, or documented diagnosis of moderate-to-severe AD from Screening to Baseline/Day 1 visit (ie, EASI >=16).
  • Presence of any skin disease, other than NE or mild AD, that could interfere with assessment of the study outcomes, including but not limited to psoriasis and other forms of eczema (dyshidrotic eczema, stasis dermatitis, asteatotic eczema, and neurodermatitis).
  • Presence of any skin manifestations suggestive of psoriasis including but not limited to nail pitting, scalp, palms, soles, or skin folds involvement, as well as personal or family history of psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis.
  • Prior treatment at any time with lebrikizumab, dupilumab, tralokinumab, or oral Janus kinase inhibitor.
  • Treatment with an investigational drug within 8 weeks or within 5 half-lives (if known), whichever was longer, prior to Screening.
  • Intention to use any concomitant medication that is not permitted by this protocol or failure to undergo the required washout period for a particular prohibited medication.
  • History of anaphylaxis as defined by the Sampson criteria.
  • Uncontrolled chronic disease that might require multiple intermittent uses of systemic corticosteroids, eg, uncontrolled asthma.
  • Have had any of the following types of infection within 3 months of Screening or develop any of these infections before Baseline/Day 1:

    1. Serious (requiring hospitalisation and/or intravenous or equivalent oral antibiotic treatment, per the Investigator's opinion)
    2. Opportunistic (as defined by Winthrop 2015) Note: herpes zoster is considered active and ongoing until all vesicles are dry and crusted over
    3. Chronic (duration of symptoms, signs, and/or treatment of 6 weeks or longer), including hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections
    4. Recurring (including but not limited to herpes zoster, recurring cellulitis, and chronic osteomyelitis) with the exception of uncomplicated herpes simplex infection, which is not considered exclusionary
  • Known liver cirrhosis and/or chronic hepatitis of any aetiology.
  • Diagnosed active endoparasitic infections or at high risk of these infections.
  • Known or suspected history of immunosuppression, including history of invasive opportunistic infections (eg, tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, listeriosis, coccidioidomycosis, pneumocystosis, and aspergillosis) despite infection resolution, or unusually frequent, recurrent, or prolonged infections, per the Investigator's judgement.
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or known positive HIV serology.
  • In the Investigator's opinion, any clinically significant laboratory test results from the chemistry or haematology tests obtained at the Screening visit.
  • History of malignancy, including mycosis fungoides/cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, within 5 years before the Screening visit, except for completely treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix or completely treated and resolved nonmetastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin with no evidence of recurrence in the past 12 weeks.
  • Severe concomitant illness(es) that in the Investigator's judgement would adversely affect the participation in the study. Any other medical or psychological condition that in the opinion of the Investigator may suggest a new and/or insufficiently understood disease, may present an unreasonable risk to the study participant because of their participation in this clinical trial, may make participation unreliable, or may interfere with study assessments.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study.
  • History of sensitivity and/or allergy to any of the ingredients of the trial medication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Placebo-controlled Period: Lebrikizumab
Lebrikizumab SC injection.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo-controlled Period: Placebo
Matching placebo SC injection.
Experimental: Blinded Extension Period: Lebrikizumab
Lebrikizumab SC injection.
Experimental: Blinded Extension Period: Lebrikizumab + Placebo
Matching placebo SC injection.
Lebrikizumab SC injection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-point Reduction from Baseline at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The IGA is an instrument used to globally rate the severity of a participants.
Baseline, Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants with Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) >=4 at Baseline Achieving a >=4-point Improvement in Pruritus NRS Score from Baseline at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable".
Baseline, Week 24
Absolute Change from Baseline in Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) to Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 24
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire completed by the participant used to assess the impact of skin disease on the participant's QoL during the previous week. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment. Each question is scored from 0 to 3 (not at all, a little, a lot, and very much), giving a total score ranging from 0 to 30. A high score is indicative of a poor QoL.
Baseline up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50 Percent (%) Reduction in Body Surface Area (BSA) from Baseline at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
BSA assessment estimates the extent of disease or skin involvement with respect to NE and is expressed as a percentage of total body surface. Body surface area will be determined by the Investigator or designee using the participant palm=1% BSA rule.
Baseline, Week 24
Absolute Change from Baseline in European Quality of Life Survey (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
EQ-5D-5L is a standardised measure of health status that provides a profile of participant health on the day of questionnaire completion. It consists of 2 parts: a descriptive system comprising 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression), each of which have 5 response levels of perceived problems, and a visual analogue scale scoring overall health on a scale from 0 (worst conceivable state of health) to 100 (best conceivable state of health).
Baseline, Week 24
Absolute Change from Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status (PGADS) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
PGADS measures static disease severity. Participants are asked "Considering all the ways in which your eczema affects you, indicate how well you are doing" and rate their overall well-being based on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 being "Poor" to 5 being "Excellent".
Baseline, Week 24
Absolute Change in Skin Pain NRS Score from Baseline at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The Skin Pain NRS is a two-item measure including an 11-point scale in which participants are asked to rate their skin pain over the prior 24 hours, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst imaginable pain.
Baseline, Week 24
Absolute Change in ItchyQoL from Baseline at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The ItchyQoL questionnaire is a PRO measure specifically designed to assess the impact of pruritus (itch) on an individual's quality of life. Both versions of ItchyQoL Frequency and Bother will be assessed in the study. The assessment consists of 22 items for Frequency and 15 items for Bother, covering 3 domains: symptoms, functioning, emotions. Each item utilises a 5-point response scale (1: never; 2: rarely; 3: sometimes; 4: often; 5: all of the time). A total score is calculated by summing individual item responses with higher scores indicating greater impact on health-related quality of life.
Baseline, Week 24
Percentage Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) from Baseline at Week 24 in Participants with Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The EASI is used to assess the severity and extent of AD; it is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and or extensive disease.
Baseline, Week 24
Change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
PGI-S is a single-item assessment of perceived symptom or health status severity using a 5-point verbal rating scale ranging from 1 to 5 (no symptoms experienced, mild, moderate, severe, very severe).
Baseline, Week 24
Change from Baseline in PGI-S Itch at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
PGI-S is a single-item assessment of perceived symptom or health status severity using a 5-point verbal rating scale ranging from 1 to 5 (no symptoms experienced, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Participants will be evaluated for PGI-S for itch for overall NE-related health status.
Baseline, Week 24
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 24
Time Frame: At Week 24
The PGI-C is a single-item assessment of perceived change in a symptom or health status. Change is captured using a 7-point verbal rating scale (much worse, moderately worse, a little worse, no change, a little better, moderately better, and much better).
At Week 24
PGI-C Itch at Week 24
Time Frame: At Week 24
The PGI-C is a single-item assessment of perceived change in a symptom or health status. Change is captured using a 7-point verbal rating scale (much worse, moderately worse, a little worse, no change, a little better, moderately better, and much better). Participants will be evaluated for PGI-C for itch for overall NE-related health status.
At Week 24
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) at Week 24
Time Frame: At Week 24
CGI-C is a single item assessment of change in participants' condition based on clinician assessment at a given timepoint. Change is captured using a 7-point verbal rating scale (much worse, moderately worse, a little worse, no change, a little improved, moderately improved, much improved).
At Week 24
Change from Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
CGI-S is a single-item assessment of severity of the participants' condition based on clinician assessment at a given timepoint. Change is captured using a 4-point verbal rating scale (none, mild, moderate, severe).
Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants with DLQI >=4 at Baseline Achieving DLQI >=4-point Improvement from Baseline at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire completed by the participant used to assess the impact of skin disease on the participant's QoL during the previous week. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment. Each question is scored from 0 to 3 (not at all, a little, a lot, and very much), giving a total score ranging from 0 to 30. A high score is indicative of a poor QoL.
Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving an IGA Score of 0 or 1 and a >=2-point Reduction from Baseline at Week 48 Among those Participants who Achieved this Response at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
The IGA is an instrument used to globally rate the severity of a participants.
Baseline, Week 48
Percentage of Participants with Pruritus NRS >=4 at Baseline Achieving a >=4-point Improvement in Pruritus NRS Score from Baseline at Week 48, Among those Participants who Achieved this Response at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48
The Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable".
Baseline, Week 48
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI >=4-point Improvement from Baseline, from Week 24 up to Week 48, Among those Participants who Achieved this Response at Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 up to Week 48
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire completed by the participant used to assess the impact of skin disease on the participant's QoL during the previous week. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment. Each question is scored from 0 to 3 (not at all, a little, a lot, and very much), giving a total score ranging from 0 to 30. A high score is indicative of a poor QoL.
Baseline, Week 24 up to Week 48
Absolute Change from Baseline in DLQI to Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 48
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire completed by the participant used to assess the impact of skin disease on the participant's QoL during the previous week. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment. Each question is scored from 0 to 3 (not at all, a little, a lot, and very much), giving a total score ranging from 0 to 30. A high score is indicative of a poor QoL.
Baseline up to Week 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Study Director, Almirall, S.A.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • M-27501-30
  • 2025-522403-17-00 (Ctis)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nummular Eczema

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe