MINDZ-- Minimally Invasive Approach Pilot Study (MINDZ-MAP)

April 15, 2026 updated by: Neurosoft Bioelectronics SA

MINDZ-- Minimally Invasive Approach Pilot Study Single Center, First-in-Human Evaluation of MINDZ Electrode- Demonstrating the Feasibility of Safe, Burr-hole Deployment and Functional Efficacy

This clinical investigation is a pilot, first-in-human (FIH) study designed to demonstrate proof of concept, safety, and functional performance of the MINDZ subdural electrode grid when used in relevant neurosurgical settings. The study will provide initial clinical evidence to support future conformity assessment and CE marking under the European Medical Device Regulation (MDR).

The investigational device, MINDZ, developed by Neurosoft Bioelectronics, is a novel, soft and highly conformable subdural electrode grid designed for minimally invasive implantation through a burr hole. Its flexible structure is intended to improve conformity to the cortical surface, reduce dead space between the electrode and brain tissue, and potentially lower the risk of complications associated with craniotomy, while maintaining adequate cortical coverage for effective monitoring and mapping.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 and ≤75 years at the time of enrolment.
  • Patients diagnosed with a brain tumour or epilepsy who require neurosurgical intervention. This includes patients undergoing craniotomy for brain surgery without the need for intracranial electrode monitoring, as well as patients undergoing neurosurgery with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using subdural electrodes. Specifically, this includes patients for whom subdural strip electrodes are indicated and planned to be implanted through standard-size burr holes (e.g., for phase-reversal evaluation)
  • Participants capable and willing to provide informed consent for participation in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of significant psychiatric impairments which, in the opinion of the investigator, will interfere with the proper administration or completion of the protocol.
  • Any medical condition that contradicts neurosurgical intervention (i.e., acute or ongoing untreated infections, anticoagulant medication that cannot be discontinued, factor XIII deficiency or any other hematological disease).
  • Participation in another clinical study.
  • Known intolerances to the materials used in the soft device (medical grade silicone or platinum).
  • Vulnerable subject groups (e.g., pregnancy or lactation, prisoners, etc.).
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MINDZ Subdural Electrode Grid for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring
This is a single arm study with no comparator. The MINDZ subdural electrode will be used in addition to the standard of care work flow.

The study intervention is limited to the insertion of the investigational device through the burr hole (up to 15 minutes), followed by an additional 5-minute recording using the device, resulting in a total extension of approximately 20 minutes to the standard surgical procedure. The data recorded using the investigational device will not be used for clinical decision-making.

Following completion of the recording, the device will be removed through the burr hole, and the surgery will proceed according to the standard clinical protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of the MINDZ Subdural Electrode Grid
Time Frame: during the intraoperative procedure and up to 30days follow up

Incidence of device-emergent adverse events (SADE and ADE), assessed during the intraoperative procedure, post-procedurally, up to hospital discharge, and at the 30-day follow-up call.

Acceptance criterion: No SADEs or ADEs observed in any patient.

during the intraoperative procedure and up to 30days follow up
Functional Performance of the MINDZ Subdural Electrode Grid
Time Frame: during the intraoperative procedure (post-deployment)
Device functionality following deployment, evaluated based on impedance measurements across all electrode contacts, assessed during the intraoperative procedure Acceptance criterion: Acceptable impedance values (<30 kΩ) achieved in at least 75% of electrode channels
during the intraoperative procedure (post-deployment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability
Time Frame: up to 7 days post-intervention
User-reported device usability, assessed via questionnaire completed by each participating neurosurgeon following the intervention
up to 7 days post-intervention
Evaluation of haptic feedback during insertion and deployment
Time Frame: up to 7days post-intervention
Operator-reported ratings of haptic feedback during insertion and deployment, collected via questionnaire (e.g., force perception, resistance, and tactile response)
up to 7days post-intervention
Procedural time assessment
Time Frame: during intraoperative procedure
during intraoperative procedure
Technical difficulties and device deficiencies (DDs)
Time Frame: during intraoperative procedure
during intraoperative procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIP-04012

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring

Clinical Trials on MINDZ Subdural Electrode Grid

Subscribe