- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07543913
Comparison of Two Drugs ,i.e., Nalbuphine Vs Ketamine at Low Doses for the Peri-Operative Shivering Control in Patients Undergoing Gynaecological Surgery Under Spinal Anaesthesia
Comparison of Nalbuphin vs Ketamine for the Control of Peri-operative Shivering in Patients Undergoing Gynaecological Surgery Under Spinal Anaesthesia
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Shivering, a repetitive involuntary muscular activity, is the most common problem during and after spinal anesthesia. The spinal anesthesia not only causes vasodilation, resulting in rapid loss of heat, but it also causes redistribution of heat in the peripheral areas, resulting in hypothermia and, eventually, shivering. Although it does not result in death, complications can arise in patients with a history of cardiorespiratory diseases, endangering the patients' safety. These complications include hypoxemia with increased lactic acidosis and carbon dioxide, increased oxygen consumption, increased intraocular and intracerebral pressure resulting in aggravation of post-operative pain and increased surgical bleeding that interferes with pulse rate and ECG monitoring.
Various treatments are currently available to control shivering in patients following spinal anesthesia. These include both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods. Non-pharmaceutical methods are effective but expensive. A variety of pharmacological methods for controlling post-spinal anesthesia shivering have been suggested, including ketamine and nalbuphine as well as many others that are inexpensive and easy to use. Ketamine, a competitive receptor antagonist of N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA), is known to reduce regional anesthesia by 70% and postoperative shivering by impairing thermoregulatory controls. It causes vasoconstriction in patients at risk of hypothermia. Ketamine controls shivering through non-shivering thermogenesis, either through the β-adrenergic effect of norepinephrine or through the hypothalamus. Nalbuphine, a semi-synthetic "class B" opioid analgesic, has both K-agonist and µ-antagonist properties. It has a high affinity for K-opioid receptors in the central nervous system. In the hypothalamus, the temperature regulation threshold is lowered by it for vasoconstriction during shivering due to the presence of high-density a2 adeno-receptors. The anti-shivering effects of intravenous ketamine and nalbuphine are poorly understood. Therefore, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study has been designed to compare the potency and efficacy of ketamine with nalbuphine and investigate the possible control mechanisms in patients undergoing gynecological surgery receiving spinal anesthesia.
The objectives of this study are to investigate and compare the effects of nalbuphine and ketamine in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for gynecological surgeries in terms of:
- Incidence of shivering in both study groups
- Determine the grades of shivering
- Complications of study drugs such as vomiting and sedation
- Need of Rescue drug (injection of Tramadol IV 0.5 mg/kg)
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Sargodha, Pakistan
- DHQ
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
i. Female patients of age between 18 and 40 years undergoing gynecological surgeries (total abdominal hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, myomectomy).
ii. ASA 1 and 2.
Exclusion Criteria:
i. ASA 3 and onwards as per the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.
ii. Obstetric patients
iii. Patients who are allergic to study drugs.
iv. Patients undergoing general anesthesia.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Participants assigned to this arm received injection nalbuphine.
After spinal anesthesia in a sitting position at L3-L4 or L4-L5 using a 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle, 1.2 mL of 0.75% (7.5 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine was injected in the subarachnoid space.
The Bromage scale and cold test by using a spirit swab will be used to evaluate the subarachnoid block for the desired motor and sensory blocks, respectively.
After spinal anesthesia, the study drug Nalbuphin (0.07 mg/kg) will be administered intravenously to group N, and oxygen will be given through a face mask at 4 liters per minute.
|
After spinal anesthesia in a sitting position at L3-L4 or L4-L5 using a 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle, 1.2 mL of 0.75% (7.5 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine was injected in the subarachnoid space.
The Bromage scale and cold test by using a spirit swab will be used to evaluate the subarachnoid block for the desired motor and sensory blocks, respectively.
After spinal anesthesia, the study drug Nalbuphin (0.07 mg/kg) will be administered intravenously to group N, and oxygen will be given through a face mask at 4 liters per minute.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Participants assigned to this arm received injection Ketamine.
After spinal anesthesia in a sitting position at L3-L4 or L4-L5 using a 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle, 1.2 mL of 0.75% (7.5 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine was injected into the subarachnoid space.
The Bromage scale and cold test by using a spirit swab will be used to evaluate the subarachnoid block for the desired motor and sensory blocks, respectively.
After spinal anesthesia, the study drug ketamine (0.2 mg/kg) will be administered intravenously to group N, and oxygen will be given through a face mask at 4 liters per minute.
|
After spinal anesthesia in a sitting position at L3-L4 or L4-L5 using a 25-gauge Quincke spinal needle, 1.2 mL of 0.75% (7.5 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine was injected into the subarachnoid space.
The Bromage scale and cold test by using a spirit swab will be used to evaluate the subarachnoid block for the desired motor and sensory blocks, respectively.
After spinal anesthesia, the study drug ketamine (0.2 mg/kg) will be administered intravenously to group N, and oxygen will be given through a face mask at 4 liters per minute.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of shivering in both study groups
Time Frame: Within one hour post-spinal anesthesia.
|
Shivering will be assessed by the presence or absence of shivering.
|
Within one hour post-spinal anesthesia.
|
|
Grades of shivering
Time Frame: After spinal anesthesia, grades of shivering were assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
Shivering will be assessed by Tsai and Chu, with the grade of shivering as follows: Grade of shivering: clinical sign 0 No shivering
|
After spinal anesthesia, grades of shivering were assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Heart rate
Time Frame: After spinal anesthesia, heart rate will be assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
Heart rate will be monitored by a pulse oximeter probe.
|
After spinal anesthesia, heart rate will be assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
|
Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: After spinal anesthesia, oxygen saturation was assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
Oxygen saturation will be monitored with a pulse oximeter probe.
|
After spinal anesthesia, oxygen saturation was assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
|
Systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: After spinal anesthesia, systolic blood pressure was assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
Systolic blood pressure was measured with non-invasive blood pressure cuff.
|
After spinal anesthesia, systolic blood pressure was assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
|
Diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: After spinal anesthesia, diastolic blood was assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
Diastolic blood pressure was assessed by non-invasive blood pressure cuff.
|
After spinal anesthesia, diastolic blood was assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
|
Temperature
Time Frame: After spinal anesthesia, temperature was assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
Temperature was assessed by forehead temperature probe.
|
After spinal anesthesia, temperature was assessed at 5 minutes and then after every 10 minutes until 60 minutes.
|
|
Sedation
Time Frame: Sedation was assessed for 1 hour post spinal anaesthesia.
|
Sedation will be assessed by Ramsay sedation score as follows: Sedation score Sedation level
|
Sedation was assessed for 1 hour post spinal anaesthesia.
|
|
Vomiting
Time Frame: Vomiting was assessed for one hour post spinal anesthesia.
|
Vomiting will be assessed clinically.
|
Vomiting was assessed for one hour post spinal anesthesia.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Need of Rescue drug
Time Frame: Within one hour post-spinal anesthesia.
|
If the grade of shivering is ≥3, then 0.5 mg/kg of injection tramadol will be administered intravenously as a second rescue plan to control shivering in both study groups.
|
Within one hour post-spinal anesthesia.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- SMC-ANS-2025-007
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Your study is a single-center anesthesia comparison trial.
There is no requirement to share individual participant data (IPD).
Unless you have a formal data-sharing mechanism (repository, request process, timelines), selecting Yes will create extra mandatory fields.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Peri-operative Shivering Under Spinal Anaesthesia
-
Hvidovre University HospitalCompletedPACU Stay After THA Under Spinal Anaesthesia | PACU Stay After TKA Under Spinal AnaesthesiaDenmark
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingPrevention of Shivering With Spinal AnaesthesiaEgypt
Clinical Trials on Participants assigned to this arm received injection nalbuphine.
-
King Saud UniversityCompletedHalitosis | Dentures | Denture Stomatitis | BiofilmsSaudi Arabia
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaNot yet recruiting
-
Gilead SciencesWithdrawnTriple-negative Breast Cancer