Evaluation of Accelerated Bachmann Bundle Area Pacing in Heart Failure With Reduced ejectIon Fraction Who Have electrocarDioGraphic Evidence of Interatrial Block and Indicated for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (BRIDGE-HF)

April 20, 2026 updated by: Eue-Keun Choi, Seoul National University Hospital
To evaluate the effect of accelerated atrial resynchronization achieved through Bachmann bundle pacing at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and interatrial block

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Interatrial block (IAB) is a distinct electrocardiographic finding resulting from delayed conduction between the right and left atria through Bachmann's bundle (BB). In a prevalence study of non-hospitalized individuals aged 65 years or older in sinus rhythm, IAB was observed in 59% of participants. With population aging and improved survival among patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, the prevalence of IAB is expected to increase further. Importantly, IAB leads to delayed left atrial contraction and impaired left ventricular diastolic filling, pathophysiological features commonly observed in heart failure (HF) that contribute to worsening HF symptoms.

Bachmann bundle area pacing (BBAP) has emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing. Recent studies have demonstrated that BBAP, when guided by intracardiac electrograms and implemented using sheath-assisted atrial lead implantation techniques, is a safe and feasible approach for effectively correcting IAB. Echocardiographic data have shown that BBAP induces biatrial resynchronization. In clinical studies involving patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), BBAP has been associated with significant clinical benefits, including improvements in quality of life, increased physical activity, and reductions in NT-proBNP levels. In these HFpEF studies, the clinical effects of BBAP were evaluated using physiologically accelerated pacing (approximately 70 beats per minute or individualized fine-tuned accelerated pacing based on body size and left ventricular ejection fraction), with particularly notable benefits observed in the improvement of diastolic function.

Despite these promising findings, the role of BBAP and BBAP-mediated accelerated pacing in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has not yet been clearly established. In animal (porcine) models, improvement in atrial synchrony achieved through BBAP has been shown to significantly increase left ventricular stroke volume compared with conventional RAA pacing, as confirmed by comprehensive hemodynamic analyses. However, despite the potential advantages of this more physiological pacing strategy, human data evaluating BBAP in patients with HFrEF remain limited.

Accordingly, the present study aims to evaluate the clinical effects of atrial resynchronization achieved through accelerated BBAP in patients with HFrEF accompanied by interatrial block who meet indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years at the time of screening.
  2. A documented diagnosis of chronic heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV.
  3. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, documented by an imaging study performed within 12 months prior to screening.
  4. Receiving optimized guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), unless contraindicated or not tolerated:

    • Participants receiving ongoing treatment must be on a stable regimen for at least 1 month prior to screening (except for diuretics).
    • Most patients with heart failure require diuretics for volume control, and dose adjustments may be made based on clinical status, including symptoms, signs, and body weight. Each participant should receive individualized diuretic therapy to maintain optimal volume status.
  5. Presence of interatrial block (IAB), defined as a P-wave duration ≥120 ms on a 12-lead electrocardiogram or ECG recording device.
  6. An indication for dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary or secondary prevention.
  7. NT-proBNP measured within 3 months prior to randomization meeting one of the following criteria:

    • NT-proBNP >300 pg/mL

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-paroxysmal AF.
  2. Uncontrolled tachyarrhythmia.
  3. Sinus bradycardia requiring continuous atrial pacing or atrioventricular block requiring ventricular pacing.
  4. Acute decompensated heart failure at the time of screening or hospitalization for worsening heart failure within 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  5. Moderate to severe primary valvular heart disease (functional mitral regurgitation or tricuspid regurgitation is not an exclusion criterion).
  6. Prior mechanical tricuspid valve replacement.
  7. Coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) or valve surgery/repair performed within 12 weeks prior to enrollment, or planned after randomization.
  8. Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
  9. Infiltrative cardiomyopathy, including but not limited to amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, or Fabry disease.
  10. An indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
  11. Chronic kidney disease, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 mL/min/1.73 m² calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
  12. Chronic liver disease, defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or alkaline phosphatase >3 times the upper limit of normal at screening.
  13. Severe pulmonary disease, such as cor pulmonale or irreversible lung disease requiring inhaled therapy or long-term oxygen therapy.
  14. Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as a mean blood pressure >140/90 mmHg based on outpatient clinic measurements or home blood pressure recordings within the previous 30 days, or ongoing up-titration of antihypertensive medications.
  15. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning pregnancy or breastfeeding during the study period.
  16. Active malignancy requiring treatment at the time of screening.
  17. Life expectancy <12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BBAP on

In the Bachmann bundle pacing ON group, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator will be programmed for 6 weeks with a lower rate limit (LRL) of 70 beats per minute, DDDR mode, and atrial preference pacing (APP) enabled.

After the initial 6-week randomized period, to eliminate the effects of prior pacing, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in both groups will be reprogrammed to an LRL of 30 beats per minute in VVI mode, followed by a 4-week washout period.

After the washout period, participants will undergo crossover, such that those initially assigned to the Bachmann bundle pacing ON group will be switched to the OFF group, and those initially assigned to the OFF group will be switched to the ON group, with the assigned pacing mode maintained for an additional 6 weeks.

ICD programmed for 6 weeks with LRL 70 beats/min, DDDR, and APP enabled.
Active Comparator: BBAP off

In the Bachmann bundle pacing OFF group, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator will be programmed for 6 weeks with an LRL of 30 beats per minute in VVI mode.

After the initial 6-week randomized period, to eliminate the effects of prior pacing, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in both groups will be reprogrammed to an LRL of 30 beats per minute in VVI mode, followed by a 4-week washout period.

After the washout period, participants will undergo crossover, such that those initially assigned to the Bachmann bundle pacing ON group will be switched to the OFF group, and those initially assigned to the OFF group will be switched to the ON group, with the assigned pacing mode maintained for an additional 6 weeks.

ICD programmed for 6 weeks with an LRL 30 beats/min in VVI mode
Other: RAAP on
A comparator cohort receiving accelerated atrial resynchronization via right atrial appendage pacing will be enrolled separately at institutions distinct from those recruiting participants for Bachmann bundle pacing. In the right atrial appendage pacing cohort, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator will be programmed for the initial 6 weeks with an LRL of 70 beats per minute, DDDR mode, and atrial preference pacing enabled. Individualized adjustment of the LRL will be permitted at the investigator's discretion based on the patient's clinical status.
ICD programmed for 6 weeks with LRL 70 beats/min, DDDR, and APP enabled.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Relative change in NT-proBNP at 6 weeks (accelerated Bachmann bundle area pacing ON) compared with baseline (accelerated Bachmann bundle area pacing OFF).
Time Frame: up to 6 weeks
up to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, and 12 months compared with baseline.
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Changes in E and A wave velocity (m/s) on echocardiography at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, and 12 months compared with baseline.
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Changes in E/A and E/E' ratios on echocardiography at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, and 12 months compared with baseline.
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Change in left atrial diameter (mm) on echocardiography at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, and 12 months compared with baseline.
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Change in left atrial strain (%) on echocardiography at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, and 12 months compared with baseline
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Change in left atrial volume index (LAVI, ml/m2) on echocardiography at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, and 12 months compared with baseline.
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, and 12 months compared with baseline.
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Change in NYHA functional class at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, and 12 months.
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Change in peak oxygen consumption (VO₂ max) at 6 weeks, 16 weeks, and 12 months compared with baseline.
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Incidence of newly detected atrial fibrillation (AF).
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Atrial fibrillation (AF) burden (%)
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
Change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) compared with baseline.
Time Frame: up to 12 months
up to 12 months
The occurence of clinical outcomes at 12 months, including: a) All-cause mortality, b) Worsening heart failure, regardless of hospitalization*, and c) Composite outcome of (a) and (b)
Time Frame: up to 12 months
* Worsening heart failure is defined as deterioration in symptoms, signs, imaging, or laboratory findings requiring unplanned medical intervention, including up-titration of oral diuretics or administration of intravenous diuretics.
up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eue-Keun Choi, M.D. Ph.D., Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Clinical Trials on BBAP on

Subscribe