- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07547514
The Effects of Yoga on Sensory, Motor, Cognitive Skills, and Perceived Stress in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder
Yoga Intervention for Improving Sensory, Motor, Cognitive Skills, and Reducing Perceived Stress in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder
This clinical study aims to investigate the effects of yoga on children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). DCD is a condition that can make it difficult for children to perform everyday activities, as it affects their ability to plan movements, maintain balance, and coordinate their actions. Children with DCD may also experience challenges related to attention, perception, and coping with stress.
The main purpose of this study is to examine whether a structured yoga program can improve children's sensory (how they perceive and process information from their environment), motor (movement and coordination), and cognitive (attention, planning, and problem-solving) skills, as well as reduce their perceived stress levels. Yoga is a holistic approach that includes breathing exercises, body awareness, balance activities, and relaxation techniques, which may support both physical and mental well-being.
The hypothesis of the study is that children with DCD who participate in the yoga program will show greater improvements in sensory-motor and cognitive skills and experience lower levels of perceived stress compared to those who do not participate or who receive standard support. Regular yoga practice is expected to help children become more aware of their bodies, perform movements more effectively, and gain greater independence in daily activities.
The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the development of intervention programs for children with DCD and to provide evidence on whether yoga can be an effective complementary approach to support their overall development.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
- Fenerbahçe University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Being between 7 and 11 years of age
- Having a diagnosis of Developmental Coordination Disorder according to DSM-5 criteria
- Attending school
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having any comorbid neurological, psychiatric, or orthopedic diagnosis
- Currently participating in an occupational therapy or physiotherapy program
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Yoga Intervention Group
Participants in this group will receive a structured yoga program designed for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder.
The program will include breathing exercises, body awareness activities, balance and coordination postures, and relaxation techniques.
Sessions will be conducted by a trained professional, delivered in a consistent format, and adapted to the developmental needs of the children.
The intervention aims to improve sensory processing, motor coordination, cognitive functions, and reduce perceived stress levels.
|
Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive a structured yoga program specifically designed for children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. The intervention will be delivered over a period of 12 weeks, with one session per week, resulting in a total of 12 sessions. Each session will last approximately 40 minutes and will be conducted by a certified children's yoga instructor. The yoga sessions will be administered in small groups of five participants to ensure individualized attention and active participation. The intervention program is designed to target sensory processing, motor coordination, cognitive functions, and emotional regulation through a combination of physical, breathing, and mindfulness-based activities. Each session will consist of four structured components: Warm-up (5 minutes): This phase will include light physical activities such as running, jumping, stretching, and relaxation exercises. Breathing awareness exercises will also be introduced t |
|
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants in the control group will not receive any intervention following the initial assessment.
They will be scheduled for a follow-up appointment, and post-intervention assessments will be conducted after 12 weeks.
After the completion of the second assessment, the same yoga intervention applied to the intervention group will be offered to children in the control group to ensure they also benefit from the program.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Proficiency Test
Time Frame: at baseline (July 2024) and at 12 weeks (September 2024)
|
The Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Proficiency Test was used and to assess the gross and fine motor skills of children between the ages of 4 years 5 months and 14 years 5 months.
This initial version of the test consisted of 8 subtests and 46 items.
Later, in 2005, the test was revised, and the total version (46 items) was revised by removing 14 items and adding 21 items (53 items) to create the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test 2 (BOT-2), which is suitable for individuals aged 4-21 years.
BOT-2 includes four motor domains: fine motor control, hand coordination, body coordination, strength, and agility, and a total of eight subtests related to these domains.
The highest possible score on this 53-item test is 320.
A short formula of 14 items was created for this test, and then in 2010, the number of items was reduced to 12 and revised.
The highest possible score during the test is 72.
|
at baseline (July 2024) and at 12 weeks (September 2024)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Structured Observations of Sensory Integration- Motor
Time Frame: at baseline (July 2024) and at 12 weeks (September 2024)
|
Structured Observations of Sensory Integration- Motor is a standardized norm-referenced neuropsychiatric test of auditory-regional motor delivery based on Ayres Clinical Observations.
The standardization included 1000 children aged between 5 and 14 years 11 months.
SOSI-M consists of 14 clinical observations that assess proprioceptive, vestibular processing, motor planning, and postural control.
Some of these clinical observations include Romberg test, single-leg standing, modified Schilder's arm extension test, extension against parts, ocular movements (vertical and horizontal), and diadochokinesis.
The overall internal performance (Cronbach's alpha) value of the scale is between 0.66 and 0.84.
The within-group overall performance value of the scale is 0.98.
|
at baseline (July 2024) and at 12 weeks (September 2024)
|
|
Dynamic Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment-Children
Time Frame: at baseline (July 2024) and at 12 weeks (September 2024)
|
This is a standardized test developed by Katz, Golstand, Bar-Ilan et al. (2007) to assess cognitive abilities in children aged 6-12 years.
It includes 21 subtests across five domains: orientation, spatial perception, praxis, visual-auditory construction, and thinking processes.
The praxis domain comprises three subtests: motor imitation, object use, and symbolic actions.
Motor imitation evaluates posture imitation, sequential movements, and responses to verbal commands, with scoring from 0 to 2 based on accuracy; the child has 5 seconds to assume and correct the position.
In object use, the child performs specific actions with given objects within 60 seconds, scored from 0 to 2 based on accuracy.
In symbolic actions, the child first performs actions with objects and then without them, within 5 seconds, with scores ranging from 0 to 2 based on accuracy.
|
at baseline (July 2024) and at 12 weeks (September 2024)
|
|
Perceived Stress Scale in Children
Time Frame: at baseline (July 2024) and at 12 weeks (September 2024)
|
Developed by Snoeren-Hoefnagels, the test consists of 9 items.
This unidimensional scale has a 4-point Likert-type rating scale.
The original scale was administered to 223 students (100 girls, 123 boys) aged 8-11 with an average age of 9.50.
The Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be .76
and the test-retest correlation was .79.
The instructions for the Perceived Stress Scale in Children (8-11 Years) ask the child to answer how appropriate each item is for them when evaluating the past week.
High scores on the scale questions indicate a high level of stress.
In the scale, which does not contain any reverse items, the total scores obtained by individuals range from 0 to 27 points.
|
at baseline (July 2024) and at 12 weeks (September 2024)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-52
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cognitive Ability General
-
Mead Johnson NutritionShanghai Children's Medical CenterCompletedCognitive Ability, GeneralChina
-
Hennepin Healthcare Research InstituteHennepin County Medical Center, MinneapolisCompletedCognitive Ability, General
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGeorgia Institute of Technology; The City College of New York; Aptima, Inc.; Circinnus... and other collaboratorsCompletedCognitive Ability, GeneralUnited States
-
Union College, New YorkSkidmore CollegeCompleted
-
Indonesia UniversityWageningen UniversityUnknownCognitive Ability, GeneralIndonesia
-
Mead Johnson NutritionCompletedCognitive Ability, GeneralChina
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Completed
-
Union College, New YorkCompletedCognitive Ability, GeneralUnited States
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Not yet recruitingCognitive Ability General | Functional AbilitiesUnited States
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedCognitive Ability, General | AchievementUnited States
Clinical Trials on Yoga intervention
-
Northwestern UniversityCompleted
-
University of PittsburghNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Center for Complementary and...CompletedObesity | Physical Activity | Weight Loss | Weight Change, BodyUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity of Toronto; Yoga Science FoundationCompletedStress | Negative Thoughts | Mild DepressionUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityWithdrawnDepression | Ocular Hypertension | Stress | Anxiety | Sleep DisturbanceUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityCompletedDepression | Stress | Anxiety | Sleep Disturbance | Balance ImpairmentUnited States
-
University of OsloCompletedMental Health | Depression, Anxiety | Sleep Problem | Public Health | University StudentsNorway
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalEnrolling by invitation
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignCompleted
-
Brock UniversitySocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaActive, not recruiting