Reproducibility of Dental Bite Mark Overlay Analysis Using Digital 3D Models in Adult Participants (OVERLAY-REPRO)

April 20, 2026 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Reproducibility and Repeatability of Digital Overlay Techniques in Bite Mark Morphological Analysis: An Observational Study Using 3D Dental Models

This study aims to evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of a standardized digital overlay protocol used in forensic odontology for bite mark analysis. Bite mark analysis methods have been increasingly questioned due to concerns about their scientific reliability. This study focuses on the methodological evaluation of an overlay generation protocol independently of biological trace interpretation.

Thirty adult participants requiring routine dental care involving intraoral scanning will be included. A digital impression of the maxillary dentition will be obtained using a standard intraoral scanner, which is a non-invasive and routine clinical procedure.

Digital dental models will be anonymized and processed using dedicated software to generate overlays. Four operators with different levels of expertise will independently perform the overlay procedure at two separate time points.

The study will assess intra-operator repeatability and inter-operator reproducibility using quantitative 2D and 3D metrics. The objective is to determine the variability of the protocol and to contribute to the standardization and reliability of overlay-based analyses in forensic dentistry.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

This is a prospective methodological study designed to evaluate the reproducibility and repeatability of a standardized digital overlay protocol used in forensic odontology.

Background:

Bite mark analysis has been increasingly challenged due to concerns regarding its scientific validity and reliability. In this context, there is a need to assess the methodological robustness of tools used in this field, particularly digital overlay techniques used for comparison purposes.

Objectives:

The primary objective is to assess intra-operator repeatability and inter-operator reproducibility of a standardized overlay generation protocol. Secondary objectives include evaluating the influence of operator expertise and testing quantitative metrics for overlay comparison.

Methods:

Thirty adult participants undergoing routine dental care involving intraoral scanning will be recruited. Participation involves a single, non-invasive intraoral scan of the maxillary dentition, performed using a standard optical scanner.

Digital dental models will be anonymized and exported in STL and PLY formats. A standardized overlay protocol will then be applied using CloudCompare and complementary image processing software.

Four operators with different levels of expertise will independently generate overlays from each model at two separate time points (T1 and T2), spaced by several days, in order to assess repeatability and reproducibility.

Outcome Measures:

Quantitative analysis will be performed using 2D and 3D metrics, including distances between point clouds, root mean square deviation (RMS), and surface overlap measurements.

Data Management:

Only anonymized digital models and limited demographic data (age and sex) will be collected. Data will be stored on secure systems with restricted access and will not be transferred outside the European Union.

Ethics:

The study involves minimal risk, as intraoral scanning is a routine, non-invasive procedure. No biological samples are collected, and no additional interventions are performed beyond standard care.

Significance:

This study aims to provide objective data on the variability of overlay generation methods and to contribute to the standardization and scientific reliability of forensic dental analyses.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult participants recruited among patients attending a dental clinic for routine care requiring intraoral optical scanning.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Patients requiring dental care including intraoral optical scan
  • Able to understand the study and provide informed consent
  • Sufficient dentition allowing usable maxillary scan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years
  • Individuals under legal protection (guardianship or curatorship)
  • Oral conditions preventing intraoral scanning
  • Refusal to participate
  • Completely edentulous patients
  • Partially edentulous patients (>8 missing maxillary teeth)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Participants undergoing digital dental model analysis
Single cohort of adult participants undergoing a single intraoral digital scan. Digital models are subsequently analysed by four independent operators at two separate time points (T1 and T2) to assess intra- and inter-operator reproducibility.
Standardized overlay protocol applied to digital dental models (STL/PLY files). Each model is analysed twice by each of four operators at two separate time points (T1 and T2) to assess intra- and inter-operator reproducibility.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intra-operator Reproducibility of Overlay Concordance Measurements
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 7 (±2 days)
Agreement between repeated overlay analyses performed by the same operator on the same digital maxillary model across two measurement sessions
Baseline and Day 7 (±2 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inter-operator Reproducibility of Overlay Concordance Measurements
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 7 (±2 days)
Agreement between overlay analyses performed by different operators on the same digital maxillary model, assessed using quantitative concordance indicators generated from the standardized overlay protocol.
Baseline and Day 7 (±2 days)
Distance Between Point Clouds in 3D Overlay Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 7 (±2 days)
Three-dimensional distance between point clouds generated during overlay comparison of digital maxillary models, assessed using dedicated 3D analysis software. Higher values indicate greater discrepancy between overlays.
Baseline and Day 7 (±2 days)
Surface Overlap in Digital Overlay Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 7 (±2 days)
Surface overlap measured during comparison of digital maxillary overlays using standardized image processing and 3D analysis methods. Higher values indicate greater overlap between overlays.
Baseline and Day 7 (±2 days)
Influence of Operator Expertise on Overlay Reproducibility
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 7 (±2 days)
Comparison of overlay reproducibility metrics according to operator expertise level across repeated analyses of the same digital maxillary models.
Baseline and Day 7 (±2 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AP_LMC_SG_OVERLAY-REPRO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Forensic Dentistry

Clinical Trials on 3D Digital Model Overlay Analysis

Subscribe