An Evaluation of Multisense® to Ensure a Safe Return Home Following High-risk Gastrointestinal Surgery, Compared With Standard Care. (SENSE-ECO)

April 22, 2026 updated by: Rhythm Diagnostic Systems

Clinical and Health Economic Evaluation of the Multisense® Solution: Ensuring a Safe Return Home for Patients at High Risk of Complications Following Gastrointestinal Surgery, Compared With the Standard Care Pathway.

The SENSE-ECO study is a prospective, randomized trial of 490 high-risk patients designed to show that the MultiSense® remote monitoring patch safely reduces hospital stays following major digestive surgery. By continuously tracking vital signs for five days at home, the device aims to maintain clinical safety and quality of life while decreasing overall healthcare costs for the French medical system.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

SENSE-ECO study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized open-label trial designed to evaluate the clinical and medico-economic impact of the MultiSense® remote monitoring solution for 490 high-risk patients (ASA 2 or 3) undergoing major digestive surgery. The primary objective is to demonstrate that using this Class IIa wearable patch to monitor vital signs-such as heart rate, $SpO_2$, and respiratory rate-allows for a reduced initial hospital stay without increasing 30-day morbidity compared to standard care. In the experimental group, patients are equipped with the device 12 to 24 hours before discharge to continue continuous home monitoring for five days, while the study also assesses secondary factors including cost-effectiveness for the French healthcare system, patient quality of life via the fQoR-15 questionnaire, and organizational workload for medical staff. Conducted across five centers under the coordination of Dr. Ugo Marchese.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

490

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France, 80000
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre
        • Contact:
          • Dr Ugo MARCHESE, Visceral and digestive surgeon
          • Phone Number: +33 1 58 41 39 08
          • Email: ugo.marchese@aphp.fr
    • Alpes-Maritimes
      • Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, France, 06000
        • CHU de Nice
        • Contact:
          • Damien Dr Damien MASSALOU, Visceral and digestive surgeon
          • Phone Number: +33 4 92 03 92 64
          • Email: massalou.d@chu-nice.fr
    • Doubs
      • Besançon, Doubs, France, 25000
        • CHU de Besancon
        • Contact:
          • Alexandre Pr Alexandre DOUSSOT, Visceral and digestive surgeon
          • Phone Number: + 33 3 81 66 83 43
          • Email: adoussot@chu-besancon.fr
    • Seine-Maritime
      • Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France, 76000
        • CHU Charles-Nicolle
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria :

  • Adults (aged 18 and over)
  • Patients scheduled for gastrointestinal surgery :
  • Major gastrointestinal cancer surgery (pancreas, liver, stomach, oesophagus, rectum)
  • Colorectal surgery (rectal resection, surgery on the rectum and anus other than rectal resection, minor or major surgery on the small intestine and colon)
  • Patients in non-critical care with a high risk of post-surgical complications (ASA score 2 or 3)
  • Patients who have a personal mobile phone and Wi-Fi connectivity at home
  • Patients who provide written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Patients who are members of or beneficiaries of a social security scheme
  • Patients who are proficient in French

Exclusion Criteria :

  • Patients with a contraindication to the use of the device as described in the instructions for use (in particular: known skin allergy to adhesives or silicone, active implantable medical device such as a pacemaker or defibrillator, need for an MRI scan during the intended use of the device, intended application site of the device being tattooed, infected, ulcerated or damaged)
  • Any other condition which, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the patient's safety or prevent compliance with the requirements of the protocol
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patient
  • Adult under legal protection (under guardianship, curatorship or judicial protection)
  • Patient already participating in a clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MultiSense® group
Patients wearing the multisense® patch
The MultiSense device will be placed on the patient's back and will allow physicians to remotely monitor six biological parameters
No Intervention: Standard group
Patients following the standard care pathway

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean CCI score of the Detailed Complications Index, calculated on the basis of complications recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification over a 30 day postoperative period for each of the two groups: the MultiSense group and Standard group
Time Frame: 30 days
The Clavien-Dindo classification is a system used in surgery to classify postoperative complications according to their severity
30 days
The average length of the initial stay for both groups
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Up to 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average CCI score from the Detailed Complications Index, calculated based on complications recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification over 8days, 15days, 30days and 90days post-surgery for each of the two groups: MultiSense® grp & Standad grp
Time Frame: 8days, 15days, 30days and 90days
Secondary "clinical" outcome measures
8days, 15days, 30days and 90days
Average number of deaths in each arm over 8 days, 15 days, 30 days and 90 days
Time Frame: 8 days, 15 days, 30 days and 90 days
Secondary "clinical" outcome measures
8 days, 15 days, 30 days and 90 days
Average total cumulative length of stay over 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days
Secondary "clinical" outcome measures
30 days
Average number of hospital readmissions among patients receiving MultiSense® compared with patients receiving standard care, over a 30 days period; severity of the patient at readmission assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification
Time Frame: 30 days
Secondary "clinical" outcome measures
30 days
Patient quality of life scores assessed at baseline, on discharge from hospital and at 30 days using the fQoR-15 questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 days
Secondary "clinical" outcome measures Assess the impact on patient's quality of life fQoR-15 : French Quality of Recovery-15 15 : corresponds to the 15 multidimensional questions that make up the score. The total score ranges from 0 to 150 The higher the score, the better the quality of post-operative recovery High score = optimal recovery Low score = impaired recovery
30 days
Total 30-day healthcare costs (€) and cost-effectiveness comparing outcome differences between groups, including morbidity, length of stay, readmissions, patient severity, staff satisfaction, quality of life, and organisational impact.
Time Frame: 30 days
Secondary "medico-economic" outcome measures
30 days
Net benefit to the healthcare system (€) from the roll-out of the Multisense solution in France (difference between incurred and avoided costs) over 4 years
Time Frame: 4 years
Secondary "medico-economic" outcome measures
4 years
Average daily time (hours and minutes) spent on the platform by the remote monitoring team to monitor patients in the MultiSense group (collected via the MultiSense platform)
Time Frame: Daily during the 5 days remote monitoring period following hospital discharge
Secondary "organisational impact" outcome measures
Daily during the 5 days remote monitoring period following hospital discharge
Average number of incoming and outgoing calls per patient in both groups within 30 days of surgery
Time Frame: 30 days
Secondary "organisational impact" outcome measures
30 days
Table of activities and stakeholders enabling a comprehensive identification of the roles of the various parties involved in post-operative monitoring within each group
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-surgery
Secondary "organisational impact" outcome measures
Up to 30 days post-surgery
Levels of satisfaction 30 days post-operation, as reported by healthcare professionals (surgeons and paramedical staff involved in patient follow-up) and by patients, assessed using ad hoc questionnaires designed for the study
Time Frame: 30 day
Secondary "organisational impact" outcome measures
30 day
Assessment of the usability of the MultiSense® solution for healthcare professionals involved in post-operative follow-up, using the F-SUS scale completed at the end of the study
Time Frame: 18 months

Secondary organisational impact outcome measures F-SUS : French version of the System Usability Scale Minimum value : 0 Maximum value : 100

Interpretation of the score :

A high score indicates a positive result. The closer the score is to 100, the more the system (in this case, the MultiSense® solution) is considered to be user-friendly, intuitive and satisfactory for healthcare professionals. Conversely, a low score indicates poor usability.

18 months
Percentage of patients non-compliant with remote monitoring via MultiSense® (non-compliance is defined as discontinuation of monitoring before 80% of the scheduled duration has elapsed, which corresponds to the fourth day)
Time Frame: 4th day
Secondary "organisational impact" outcome measures
4th day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 18, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 17, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 19, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025 - 01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Reduction in the Initial Length of Stay

Clinical Trials on Monitoring by MultiSense®

Subscribe