- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07552805
An Evaluation of Multisense® to Ensure a Safe Return Home Following High-risk Gastrointestinal Surgery, Compared With Standard Care. (SENSE-ECO)
Clinical and Health Economic Evaluation of the Multisense® Solution: Ensuring a Safe Return Home for Patients at High Risk of Complications Following Gastrointestinal Surgery, Compared With the Standard Care Pathway.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amiens, France, 80000
- CHU Amiens-Picardie
-
Contact:
- Pr Jean-Marc REGIMBEAU, Visceral and digestive surgeon
- Phone Number: +33 3 22 08 88 93
- Email: regimbeau.jean-marc@chu-amiens.fr
-
Paris, France, 75014
- Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP Centre
-
Contact:
- Dr Ugo MARCHESE, Visceral and digestive surgeon
- Phone Number: +33 1 58 41 39 08
- Email: ugo.marchese@aphp.fr
-
-
Alpes-Maritimes
-
Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, France, 06000
- CHU de Nice
-
Contact:
- Damien Dr Damien MASSALOU, Visceral and digestive surgeon
- Phone Number: +33 4 92 03 92 64
- Email: massalou.d@chu-nice.fr
-
-
Doubs
-
Besançon, Doubs, France, 25000
- CHU de Besancon
-
Contact:
- Alexandre Pr Alexandre DOUSSOT, Visceral and digestive surgeon
- Phone Number: + 33 3 81 66 83 43
- Email: adoussot@chu-besancon.fr
-
-
Seine-Maritime
-
Rouen, Seine-Maritime, France, 76000
- CHU Charles-Nicolle
-
Contact:
- Valérie Dr Valérie BRIDOUX, Gastrointestinal surgeon
- Phone Number: +33 2 32 88 81 42
- Email: valerie.bridoux@chu-rouen.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria :
- Adults (aged 18 and over)
- Patients scheduled for gastrointestinal surgery :
- Major gastrointestinal cancer surgery (pancreas, liver, stomach, oesophagus, rectum)
- Colorectal surgery (rectal resection, surgery on the rectum and anus other than rectal resection, minor or major surgery on the small intestine and colon)
- Patients in non-critical care with a high risk of post-surgical complications (ASA score 2 or 3)
- Patients who have a personal mobile phone and Wi-Fi connectivity at home
- Patients who provide written informed consent to participate in the study
- Patients who are members of or beneficiaries of a social security scheme
- Patients who are proficient in French
Exclusion Criteria :
- Patients with a contraindication to the use of the device as described in the instructions for use (in particular: known skin allergy to adhesives or silicone, active implantable medical device such as a pacemaker or defibrillator, need for an MRI scan during the intended use of the device, intended application site of the device being tattooed, infected, ulcerated or damaged)
- Any other condition which, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the patient's safety or prevent compliance with the requirements of the protocol
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patient
- Adult under legal protection (under guardianship, curatorship or judicial protection)
- Patient already participating in a clinical trial
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: MultiSense® group
Patients wearing the multisense® patch
|
The MultiSense device will be placed on the patient's back and will allow physicians to remotely monitor six biological parameters
|
|
No Intervention: Standard group
Patients following the standard care pathway
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean CCI score of the Detailed Complications Index, calculated on the basis of complications recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification over a 30 day postoperative period for each of the two groups: the MultiSense group and Standard group
Time Frame: 30 days
|
The Clavien-Dindo classification is a system used in surgery to classify postoperative complications according to their severity
|
30 days
|
|
The average length of the initial stay for both groups
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
|
Up to 30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Average CCI score from the Detailed Complications Index, calculated based on complications recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification over 8days, 15days, 30days and 90days post-surgery for each of the two groups: MultiSense® grp & Standad grp
Time Frame: 8days, 15days, 30days and 90days
|
Secondary "clinical" outcome measures
|
8days, 15days, 30days and 90days
|
|
Average number of deaths in each arm over 8 days, 15 days, 30 days and 90 days
Time Frame: 8 days, 15 days, 30 days and 90 days
|
Secondary "clinical" outcome measures
|
8 days, 15 days, 30 days and 90 days
|
|
Average total cumulative length of stay over 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Secondary "clinical" outcome measures
|
30 days
|
|
Average number of hospital readmissions among patients receiving MultiSense® compared with patients receiving standard care, over a 30 days period; severity of the patient at readmission assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Secondary "clinical" outcome measures
|
30 days
|
|
Patient quality of life scores assessed at baseline, on discharge from hospital and at 30 days using the fQoR-15 questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Secondary "clinical" outcome measures Assess the impact on patient's quality of life fQoR-15 : French Quality of Recovery-15 15 : corresponds to the 15 multidimensional questions that make up the score.
The total score ranges from 0 to 150 The higher the score, the better the quality of post-operative recovery High score = optimal recovery Low score = impaired recovery
|
30 days
|
|
Total 30-day healthcare costs (€) and cost-effectiveness comparing outcome differences between groups, including morbidity, length of stay, readmissions, patient severity, staff satisfaction, quality of life, and organisational impact.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Secondary "medico-economic" outcome measures
|
30 days
|
|
Net benefit to the healthcare system (€) from the roll-out of the Multisense solution in France (difference between incurred and avoided costs) over 4 years
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Secondary "medico-economic" outcome measures
|
4 years
|
|
Average daily time (hours and minutes) spent on the platform by the remote monitoring team to monitor patients in the MultiSense group (collected via the MultiSense platform)
Time Frame: Daily during the 5 days remote monitoring period following hospital discharge
|
Secondary "organisational impact" outcome measures
|
Daily during the 5 days remote monitoring period following hospital discharge
|
|
Average number of incoming and outgoing calls per patient in both groups within 30 days of surgery
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Secondary "organisational impact" outcome measures
|
30 days
|
|
Table of activities and stakeholders enabling a comprehensive identification of the roles of the various parties involved in post-operative monitoring within each group
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-surgery
|
Secondary "organisational impact" outcome measures
|
Up to 30 days post-surgery
|
|
Levels of satisfaction 30 days post-operation, as reported by healthcare professionals (surgeons and paramedical staff involved in patient follow-up) and by patients, assessed using ad hoc questionnaires designed for the study
Time Frame: 30 day
|
Secondary "organisational impact" outcome measures
|
30 day
|
|
Assessment of the usability of the MultiSense® solution for healthcare professionals involved in post-operative follow-up, using the F-SUS scale completed at the end of the study
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Secondary organisational impact outcome measures F-SUS : French version of the System Usability Scale Minimum value : 0 Maximum value : 100 Interpretation of the score : A high score indicates a positive result. The closer the score is to 100, the more the system (in this case, the MultiSense® solution) is considered to be user-friendly, intuitive and satisfactory for healthcare professionals. Conversely, a low score indicates poor usability. |
18 months
|
|
Percentage of patients non-compliant with remote monitoring via MultiSense® (non-compliance is defined as discontinuation of monitoring before 80% of the scheduled duration has elapsed, which corresponds to the fourth day)
Time Frame: 4th day
|
Secondary "organisational impact" outcome measures
|
4th day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025 - 01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Reduction in the Initial Length of Stay
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity of Kiel; University of Valencia; University of Witten/Herdecke; Szeged... and other collaboratorsCompletedReduction of Length of Hospitality Stay, Reduction of Perioperative ComplicationsGermany
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
Nordsjaellands HospitalNot yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Hip | Length of Stay | Closed ReductionDenmark
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensCompletedArthroplasty | Length of StayFrance
-
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di ParmaRegione Emilia-RomagnaCompletedHospitalization | Length of StayItaly
-
Rhythm Diagnostic SystemsNot yet recruiting
-
Rajavithi HospitalCompletedTo Determine Whether ERAS Can Reduce Length of Stay in Pregnant Women After Cesarean SectionThailand
-
Ospedale Edoardo BassiniRecruitingRegional Anesthesia Morbidity | Arthropathy of Hip | Opioid Consumption | Hip Arthropathy | Complication of Anesthesia | Locoregional Anesthesia | Hospital Stay, Length of Stay in Hospital From Time of Surgery Till DischargeItaly
-
Ochsner Health SystemCompletedHospital Length of Stay; Adverse Events
Clinical Trials on Monitoring by MultiSense®
-
Rhythm Diagnostic SystemsNot yet recruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier de Saint-DenisRecruitingCritical Illness | Hemodynamics | Intensive Care Units | Monitoring, Physiologic | Blood Pressure MonitoringFrance
-
IHU StrasbourgRhythm Diagnostic SystemsCompletedVisceral and Digestive Surgery | Post-surgical Monitoring | Post-surgical RehabilitationFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNot yet recruitingPediatric Kidney Disease | Transplant;Failure,KidneyFrance
-
Brainmarc Ltd.Unknown
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisURC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker CochinCompleted
-
Deutsches Herzzentrum MuenchenCompletedImprovement of Treatment SatisfactionGermany
-
Poitiers University HospitalCompletedMajor Surgery in Adult PatientsFrance
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceNot yet recruitingCare After Going to Intensive CareFrance
-
University of BernUniversity Hospital Inselspital, BerneCompletedNeurodegenerative Diseases | Aging | Activities of Daily LivingSwitzerland