Dolutegravir Versus Dolutegravir in Combination With Tenofovir for the Treatment of HTLV-1 Infection (DOT-H)

May 29, 2026 updated by: Carlos Brites

Dolutegravir Versus Dolutegravir in Combination With Tenofovir for the Treatment of HTLV-1 Infection (DOT-H): an Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Study.

This phase 2b, open-label, randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) alone versus dolutegravir combined with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in individuals with HTLV-1 infection and associated clinical manifestations. The primary objective is to compare changes in HTLV-1 proviral load at 24 and 48 weeks. Secondary outcomes include clinical, functional, immunological, and quality-of-life measures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection is a neglected condition associated with severe neurological and hematological diseases, including HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP). Currently, no effective antiviral therapy exists.

Preclinical and clinical data suggest that integrase inhibitors such as dolutegravir may reduce HTLV-1 proviral load. Additionally, combination therapy with tenofovir may enhance antiviral activity. This study builds on prior pilot data demonstrating partial virological response to DTG.

Participants will be randomized (1:1) to receive DTG alone or DTG plus TDF for 48 weeks. Outcomes will include virological, immunological, clinical, and patient-reported measures. The study aims to provide evidence for therapeutic strategies targeting HTLV-1.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

146

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Estado de Bahia
      • Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil, 40110-060
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Delano Paiva

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age equal or higher than 18 years
  • Confirmed HTLV-1 infection
  • Clinical manifestation atributable to HTLV-1
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active HIV, HCV (RNA+), or HBV (HBsAg+) infection
  • Active tuberculosis
  • Recent corticosteroid use
  • Renal impairment (CrCl <50 mL/min)
  • Autoimmune diseases
  • Wheelchair-bound individuals
  • Active malignancy (except ATLL)
  • Substance abuse interfering with adherence
  • Any condition compromising safety

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dolutegravir
Dolutegravir 50 mg p.o. daily
Active comparator will be DTG, 50 mg/day
Experimental: Combination therapy
Daily Dolutegravir 50 mg Daily Tenofovir 300 mg
In a previous study Dolutegravir was able to reduce HTLV-1 proviral load, but a few patients did not respond to therapy. We intend to use a combination of Dolutegravir + TDF to improve the response rate. There is no previous evidence on the use of such combination for treating HTLV-1 infection.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HTLV-1 Proviral Load
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 48 weeks
Measurement of HTLV-1 Proviral Load by RT-PCR. Results will be expressed as copies/ml of whole blood
From baseline to the end of treatment at 48 weeks
Changes in Pain intensity (DN4 doleur scale)
Time Frame: Baeline, 24 and 48 weeks
Change in intensity of pain measured by DN4 doleur scale (0 to 10, with values >4 indicating neuropathic pain)
Baeline, 24 and 48 weeks
Changes in Spasticity
Time Frame: BL, 24 and 48 weeks
Changes in limbs spasticity, as measured by Ashworth scale. The Ashworth Scale uses a simple ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, where the highest values mean increased spasticity
BL, 24 and 48 weeks
Changes in muscle strenght
Time Frame: BL, 24 and 48 weeks
Evaluation of muscle strenght by Kendall Muscle Grading system (Kendal scale), which ranges from 0 to 10, with highest values indicating better muscle strenght
BL, 24 and 48 weeks
Changes in motor score scales
Time Frame: BL, 24, 48 weeks
Evaluation of changes in motor performance using the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) is a subscale of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) that assesses lower extremity muscle strength.The score range is 0-5 for each of 5 key muscles (hip flexors, knee extensors, ankle dorsi-flexors, long toe extensors and ankle plantar flexors) of each leg, with a maximum score of 50 (the lower values indicates worse motor function)
BL, 24, 48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nocturia frequency
Time Frame: Baseline, 24 and 48 weeks
Nocturia frequency across the study
Baseline, 24 and 48 weeks
Cytokines levels
Time Frame: BL, 24 and 48 weeks
Measurement of levels of (Tumon Necrosis Factor-Alpha) TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, Interferon γ-induced Protein (IP-10), Gamma-Interferon (Gamma-IFN), in picogram/cubic milimiter. Values may varies from undetectable levels to any detectable concentration, expressed in pg/mm3.
BL, 24 and 48 weeks
RAND 36-Item Health Survey
Time Frame: Baseline and at 48 weeks
The RAND Corporation Health-Related Quality of Life (RAND-36) domains are scored on a 0 to 100 range, so that a high score defines a more favorable health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The scale measure several domains of HRQoL.
Baseline and at 48 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of Adverse events and Serious adverse events
Time Frame: baseline to 48 weeks
frequency of incident AE associated with the treatment drugs
baseline to 48 weeks
Quantification of HTLV-1
Time Frame: BL, at 24 and 48 weeks
To evaluate active replication of HTLV-1, we will measure the number of copies of Long Terminal Repeat (LTR) circles to detect HTLV-1 unintegrated proviral genome and HTLV-1 plasma RNA levels. Presence of any number of copies of LTR indicates ongoing active viral replication
BL, at 24 and 48 weeks
Measurement of Levels of sCD14 and sCD163
Time Frame: BL, 24 and 48 weeks
Levels of soluble cluster of diferentiation 14 (sCD14) and 163 (sCD14), expressed in ng/mL, will be measured to evaluate levels of monocytes´ activation across the trial. Higher levels indicate increased monocytes´ activation.
BL, 24 and 48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carlos Brites, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos, Federal University of Bahia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonimized clinical data can be shared with other researchers upon reasonable request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD will be available from January 2029 to June 2029

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers with an approved protocol will be abel to access the databank upon reasonable request to the study PI

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuritis

Clinical Trials on Dolutegravir (DTG)

Subscribe