Cevostamab in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Standard of Care in Participants With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma (CEVOLUTION)

May 22, 2026 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Cevostamab in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received One to Three Prior Lines of Therapy

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of cevostamab in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (CevosPd) versus standard of care (SOC) in participants with multiple myeloma (MM) who have received one to three prior lines of therapy and have been exposed to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and lenalidomide.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

380

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00918
        • Recruiting
        • Auxilio Mutuo Cancer Center
    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010-3012
        • Recruiting
        • City of Hope National Medical Center
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92618
        • Recruiting
        • City of Hope - Lennar Foundation Cancer Center
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30329
        • Recruiting
        • Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1 at screening and immediately prior to start of administration of study treatment.
  • Individuals with ECOG Performance Status of 2 solely due to local symptoms of myeloma (e.g., pain) are eligible
  • MM diagnosis according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria
  • Received one to three lines of prior therapy that included at least two consecutive cycles of either of the following: A regimen containing an anti-CD38 therapy, a regimen containing lenalidomide
  • Participants must have measurable disease during screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known history of amyloidosis (e.g., positive Congo Red stain or equivalent in tissue biopsy or documented within serum amyloid P component scan)
  • Plasma cell leukemia or circulating plasma cell count exceeding 500 cells/liter (L) or 5% of the peripheral blood white cells
  • GI disease that might significantly alter absorption of oral drugs
  • Participants must not have any ongoing CNS disease or non-secretory myeloma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cevostamab + Pomalidomide + Dexamethasone

Cevostamab will be administered intravenously on a 21-day cycle in cycle 1 and on a 28-day cycle from cycle 2 onwards.

Pomalidomide will be administered orally (PO) on a 28-day cycle from cycle 2 onwards.

Dexamethasone will be administered as a premedication prior to cevostamab.

Participants will receive cevostamab IV as per the schedule given in the protocol.
Participants will receive pomalidomide tablet orally PO as per the schedule given in the protocol.
Participants will receive dexamethasone tablet orally PO or IV as per the schedule given in the protocol.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care (SOC)
Participants will receive investigator's choice of one SOC regimen.
Participants will receive pomalidomide tablet orally PO as per the schedule given in the protocol.
Participants will receive dexamethasone tablet orally PO or IV as per the schedule given in the protocol.
Participants will receive daratumumab SC as per the schedule given in the protocol.
Participants will receive elotuzumab IV as per the schedule given in the protocol.
Participants will receive carfilzomib IV as per the schedule given in the protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Complete Response (CR) Rate
Time Frame: Up to 1 year after the last participant is randomized
Up to 1 year after the last participant is randomized
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Rate
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Time to Confirmed Deterioration in the Disease Symptoms Scale as Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-Multiple Myeloma Module 20 (MY20)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Primary domains: fatigue, pain, physical functioning, cognitive functioning and global health status.
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Complete Response (CR) Rate
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Time to Response (TTR)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Time to Best Response (TTBR)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Progression-Free Survival 2 (PFS2)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Overall MRD-Negative Complete Response Rate
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Overall MRD-Negative Rate
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Sustained MRD-Negative CR Rate
Time Frame: At 6, 12, and 24 months
At 6, 12, and 24 months
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Tolerability as Assessed by the Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Reductions, Dose Intensity, and Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Number of Participants With Presence, Frequency of Occurrence, Severity, and/or Degree of Interference With Daily Function of Shortness of Breath, Cough, Heart Palpitations, Rash, Dizziness, and Nausea Assessed NCI PRO-CTCAE
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Change From Baseline in Shortness of Breath, Cough, Heart Palpitations, Rash, Dizziness, and Nausea Assessed by the National Cancer Institute Patient Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI PRO-CTCAE)
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Baseline and up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Change From Cycle 1 Day 8 in Treatment-Related Side Effect Bother as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, General Population 5 (FACTG GP5)
Time Frame: At Day 8 of Cycle 1, up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized. Cycle 1 is 21 days.
At Day 8 of Cycle 1, up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized. Cycle 1 is 21 days.
Change From Baseline in the Disease Symptom Scale of the EORTC QLQ-MY20
Time Frame: Baseline and Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Baseline and Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Change from Baseline in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) of the EORTC QLQ-Core 30 (C30)
Time Frame: Baseline and Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Baseline and Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Time to Confirmed Deterioration in GHS/QoL as Assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Change From Baseline in Fatigue as Assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Baseline and up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Time to Confirmed Deterioration in Fatigue as Assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Disease Symptoms as Assessed by the EORTC QLQ-MY20
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Clinically Meaningful Improvement in GHS/QoL as Assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Fatigue as Assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Percentage of Participants with Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Cevostamab at Baseline and with ADAs to Cevostamab During the Study
Time Frame: Baseline and up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized
Baseline and up to 5 years after the last participant is randomized

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level clinical data. See Roche's commitment to transparency of clinical study information here: https://go.roche.com/data_sharing

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Cevostamab

Subscribe