Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Effectiveness of LASER Therapy and PNF Technique in Neck Pain

27. april 2026 opdateret af: Istanbul Gedik University

Low-Intensity Laser Therapy Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation for Pain and Disability in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of low-intensity laser therapy, a photobiomodulation treatment, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on pain and disability in individuals with non-specific neck pain. This randomized controlled trial used the Numerical Pain Scale (primary outcome) and the Bournemouth Neck Pain Questionnaire to assess pain, a manual algometer to assess pain threshold, and the Neck Disability Index to assess disability. Three groups were included in this randomized controlled trial: Group 1: Photobiomodulation therapy (low-intensity laser therapy) + conventional physiotherapy; Group 2: Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation with stretching and strengthening + conventional physiotherapy; Group 3: Conventional physiotherapy only. We hypothesized that low-intensity laser therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation would have distinct effects on pain and disability in chronic non-specific neck pain.

Studieoversigt

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

75

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteering to participate in the study
  • A neck pain score of at least 3 on the Numerical Pain Scale in the assessment conducted prior to inclusion in the study
  • A Neck Disability Index score of 5 or higher
  • No comorbid conditions affecting the orthopaedic, neurological or cardiopulmonary systems
  • Participants who have not been enrolled in another clinical trial within the last month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who have undergone upper limb surgery (e.g. shoulder blade, shoulder, elbow, hand, wrist, etc.) within the last year
  • Individuals with a pacemaker or subcutaneous implant
  • Pregnant women or women who have recently given birth
  • Use of antidepressants, anti-inflammatory drugs or anxiolytics within the last 6 months

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Low-intensity Laser Therapy Group
Low-intensity Laser Therapy + Conventional Physiotherapy
Low-dose laser therapy was administered twice a week for a total of 10 sessions using a Chattanoga Advance device, at a power of 100 mW and an energy dose of 4 J/cm², with each trigger point receiving treatment plus four additional points marked with a cross (Legouté et al. 2019).
Andre navne:
  • Laserterapi på lavt niveau
  • Fotobiomodulationsterapi
  • Low-dose laser therapy
Conventional physiotherapy involved traditional heat therapy, pain-relieving electrical stimulation and neck exercises.
Eksperimentel: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Group
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique + + Conventional Physiotherapy
Conventional physiotherapy involved traditional heat therapy, pain-relieving electrical stimulation and neck exercises.
Stretching and strengthening exercises were performed twice a week for a total of 10 sessions on the scalene, sternocleidomastoid, trapezius, pectoralis major, pectoralis minor, intercostal and serratus anterior muscles, and three times a week for 10 minutes (including the neck extensors). The specific method involved the 'hold-release' technique for 10 repetitions of PNF stretching and the maximum isometric contraction technique for strengthening (Liu et al. 2021; Cruz-Montecinos et al. 2017).
Andre navne:
  • PNF
Aktiv komparator: Control Group
Conventional physiotherapy
Conventional physiotherapy involved traditional heat therapy, pain-relieving electrical stimulation and neck exercises.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Numerical Pain Scale
Tidsramme: at baseline and week 5
It was used to assess neck pain. Pain is assessed using a rating scale of 1-10. Higher scores indicate more severe pain.
at baseline and week 5

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Pressure-Pain Threshold Measurement
Tidsramme: at baseline and week 5
A manual algometer was used to assess the pain threshold. The pain threshold increases as the amount of pressure applied increases in kilograms.
at baseline and week 5
The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire
Tidsramme: at baseline and week 5
The study was used to assess the severity of neck pain, functional limitations, and biopsychosocial factors. This indicates that neck pain has a greater impact on the person's life (high level of limitation/pain).
at baseline and week 5
The Neck Disability Index
Tidsramme: at baseline and week 5
It was used to examine disability. An increase in the score means an increase in disability.
at baseline and week 5

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Samarbejdspartnere

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

5. februar 2024

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

28. marts 2026

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

28. marts 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

20. april 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

27. april 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

5. maj 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

5. maj 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

27. april 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. april 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

UBESLUTET

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Low-intensity Laser Therapy Treatment

Abonner