Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Recovery After Upper Extrimety Surgery (Recovery)

14. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Region Örebro County

The Effect of Anaesthetic Technique and How Anaesthesia is Titrated on the Postoperative Cognitive Performance and General Recovery Following Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery.

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine whether Bispectral Index (BIS)-guided general anesthesia improves postoperative cognitive recovery and overall quality of recovery in adults undergoing elective hand or arm surgery.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does BIS-guided anesthesia improve postoperative cognitive recovery compared with general anesthesia guided by routine clinical signs?

Does BIS-guided anesthesia improve overall postoperative recovery, as measured by the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS)?

Researchers will compare patients receiving BIS-guided general anesthesia with patients receiving clinically guided general anesthesia, in which the BIS monitor records data but the displayed values are concealed from the anesthesia team, to determine whether BIS-guided anesthetic management improves postoperative recovery. An additional comparison group will consist of patients undergoing surgery under intravenous regional anesthesia without general anesthesia.

Participants will:

undergo elective hand or arm surgery; receive either BIS-guided or clinically guided general anesthesia, or intravenous regional anesthesia without general anesthesia; complete PQRS assessments before surgery and at multiple postoperative time points, including follow-up for up to three months.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

The study was designed to investigate the relationship between anesthetic technique, depth of general anesthesia, and postoperative cognitive and overall recovery following elective surgery of the hand or arm.Patients scheduled to receive general anesthesia were randomly allocated using sealed envelopes to one of two general-anesthesia groups. In the BIS-guided group, anesthetic delivery was adjusted using the Bispectral Index, with a target BIS range of 40 to 60. In the clinically guided group, anesthesia was adjusted according to routine clinical indicators, such as blood pressure, heart rate, movement, and other clinical signs. BIS monitoring was also connected in this group, but the values were concealed from the anesthesia personnel and stored for later analysis.General anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained using sevoiurane and remifentanil according to the study protocol and routine clinical practice. Standard intraoperative monitoring included electrocardiography, noninvasive blood-pressure measurement, oxygen saturation, temperature, and BIS monitoring. Perioperative fluids, treatment of blood-pressure changes, analgesia, and prevention or treatment of postoperative nausea were managed according to the study protocol and usual clinical routines.A separate comparison group consisted of patients whose planned operation was performed using intravenous regional/local anesthesia without general anesthesia. These patients were not randomly assigned to the regional-anesthesia group; their anesthetic method had already been selected as part of their clinical surgical plan.Postoperative recovery was evaluated using the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale.

Each participant completed a preoperative baseline assessment, and postoperative assessments were planned at approximately 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery. The scale assessed physiological recovery, pain and postoperative nausea or vomiting, emotional recovery, cognitive performance, activities of daily living, and overall patient-reported recovery.Cognitive assessments included orientation, forward digit recall, backward digit recall, word recall, and word generation.

Postoperative performance was compared with each participant's own preoperative baseline rather than with a single population-level cutoff.The prospect primary assessment was cognitive recovery at 48 hours after surgery. Additional assessments examined recovery at the other postoperative time points, anesthetic exposure, recorded BIS values, perioperative physiological variables, and early postoperative recovery.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

112

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Schweden
      • Örebro, Schweden, 70185
        • Örebro University Hospital

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 65 years or older.
  • Scheduled to undergo hand or arm surgery using either intravenous regional anesthesia or general anesthesia.
  • Able to understand the study information and provide informed consent.
  • Able to complete the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale assessments and cognitive tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to complete the recovery or cognitive assessments.
  • Deafness or hearing impairment that prevented completion of the assessments.
  • Bispectral Index monitoring could not be applied or used because of technical or surgical reasons.
  • Expected duration of surgery of less than 30 minutes or more than 4 hours.
  • Allergy to nuts or soybeans in participants scheduled to receive general anesthesia.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Substance abuse.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: BIS-Guided General Anesthesia
Participants scheduled for general anesthesia were randomized to anesthesia guided by visible Bispectral Index monitoring. The anesthesia team adjusted anesthetic delivery using a target BIS range of 40 to 60. General anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with a volatile anesthetic and remifentanil according to the study protocol.
Verfahren: BIS-Guided General Anesthesia
General anesthesia was guided by visible Bispectral Index monitoring. Anesthetic delivery was adjusted to maintain a BIS value between 40 and 60. The protocol included propofol for induction and remifentanil with a volatile anesthetic for maintenance.
Aktiver Komparator: Clinically Guided General Anesthesia
Participants scheduled for general anesthesia were randomized to anesthesia guided by routine clinical signs. BIS monitoring was connected and recorded throughout anesthesia, but the BIS display was concealed from the anesthesia personnel and was not used to guide anesthetic delivery. The anesthetic regimen otherwise followed the same study protocol as the BIS-guided group.
Verfahren: Clinically Guided General Anesthesia
General anesthesia was guided by routine clinical indicators of anesthetic depth. BIS monitoring was recorded, but its values were concealed from the anesthesia personnel and were not used to adjust anesthetic delivery. The anesthetic regimen otherwise followed the same protocol as the BIS-guided group.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Participants With Cognitive Recovery at 48 Hours
Zeitfenster: 48 hours after surgery
Cognitive recovery was assessed using the cognitive domain of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS). The domain included orientation, forward digit recall, backward digit recall, word recall, and word generation. Each participant's postoperative performance was compared with that participant's preoperative baseline using the PQRS recovery criteria. A participant was classiMed as cognitively recovered when all applicable cognitive subtests met the recovery criteria. The outcome was reported as the number and percentage of participants cognitively recovered
48 hours after surgery

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Participants With Cognitive Recovery at Other Postoperative Time Points
Zeitfenster: 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Cognitive recovery was assessed using the Mve PQRS cognitive subtests: orientation, forward digit recall, backward digit recall, word recall, and word generation. Postoperative performance was compared with each participant's own preoperative baseline using the PQRS recovery criteria. The outcome was reported as the number and percentage of participants cognitively recovered at each time point.
20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Participants With Overall Postoperative Quality of Recovery
Zeitfenster: 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Overall recovery was assessed using the applicable domains of the PQRS (physiological recovery, nociception, emotional recovery, cognition, activities of daily living, and overall patient perspective). Participants were classified as having achieved overall recovery when recovery criteria were met in all applicable PQRS domains, based on comparison with the participant's preoperative baseline where applicable. The outcome was reported as the number and percentage of participants achieving overall recovery.
20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Meeting PQRS Physiological Recovery Criteria
Zeitfenster: Immediately after emergence and at 20 and 40 minutes after surgery
Physiological recovery was assessed from the PQRS physiological domain, which incorporates systolic blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, oxygen requirement, airway maintenance, agitation, level of consciousness, and ability to follow a simple command. Recovery was determined according to predefined PQRS physiological recovery criteria. Participants were classified as physiologically recovered when all applicable physiological recovery criteria were met. The outcome was reported as the number and percentage of participants meeting PQRS physiological recovery criteria.
Immediately after emergence and at 20 and 40 minutes after surgery
Postoperative Pain Severity Assessed With PQRS
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Pain was rated using the PQRS nociceptive-domain pain item on a five-category scale: 1, no pain; 2, mild pain; 3, moderate pain; 4, severe pain; and 5, worst imaginable pain. Lower scores indicated less pain. The outcome was reported as pain severity score at each postoperative assessment.
Baseline and 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Participants Meeting PQRS Emotional Rcovery Criteria
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Emotional recovery was assessed using separate PQRS ratings for depression or sadness and anxiety or nervousness. Each item ranged from 1, not at all, to 5, extreme symptoms, with lower scores indicating better emotional status. Recovery was determined according to PQRS emotional recovery criteria by comparison with the participant's preoperative baseline. The outcome was reported as the number and percentage of participants meeting emotional recovery criteria.
Baseline and 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Nausea, retching, and vomiting were assessed using the PQRS nociceptive-domain nausea and vomiting item. Scores ranged from 1, no nausea, retching, or vomiting, to 5, continuous retching or vomiting. Lower scores indicated fewer symptoms. Nausea and vomiting severity scores were assessed and summarized at each postoperative time point.
Baseline and 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Participants Meeting PQRS Activities of Daily Living Recovery Criteria
Zeitfenster: Baseline and 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Activities of daily living were assessed through the participant's ability to stand, walk, eat and drink, and dress without assistance. Each activity was rated as 1, unable; 2, able with difficulty; or 3, able with ease. Higher scores indicated better function. Recovery was determined according to PQRS activities of daily living recovery criteria by comparison with the participant's preoperative baseline. Participants were classified as recovered when all applicable activities met recovery criteria. The outcome was reported as the number and percentage of participants meeting activities of daily living recovery criteria.
Baseline and 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
Patient-Reported Overall Recovery and Satisfaction Assessed With PQRS
Zeitfenster: 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery
The PQRS overall-perspective domain assessed the perceived effect of surgery on the participant's overall perspective of recovery and satisfaction with anesthesia. Items were rated on five-category scales, with lower scores indicating less negative impact or greater satisfaction. Recovery was determined according to PQRS overall-perspective recovery criteria. The outcome was reported as the number and percentage of participants meeting overall-perspective recovery criteria at each postoperative assessment.
20 minutes, 40 minutes, 24 hours, 48 hours, 14 days, and 90 days after surgery

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Region Örebro County

Ermittler

  • Studienleiter: Pether Jildenstål, PhD, Professor, Department of Anesthesia and intensivecare University Hospital Örebro

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

23. Januar 2015

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

10. Juni 2024

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

10. Juni 2024

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

7. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

14. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

20. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

20. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

14. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Januar 2015

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 2014-004024-22
  • 2014/378 (Andere Kennung: Swedish Ethical Review Authority)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Individual participant data will not be shared because the original participant consent and ethics documentation did not include a prospective plan for external sharing of participant-level data. Study data are coded and access is restricted to the authorized research team. Results will be reported in aggregated form. Any future request for data access would require separate review and approval by the study sponsor, data controller, and relevant ethics and data-protection authorities.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Postoperatives Delirium

Klinische Studien zur BIS-Guided General Anesthesia

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Montenegro

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

3
Abonnieren