- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT06080477
Mejora de los resultados de salud mental de los pacientes con psicosis en Malawi mediante la rehabilitación comunitaria (ENHANCE)
Mejora de los resultados de salud mental posaguda para pacientes con psicosis en Malawi mediante rehabilitación comunitaria impartida por enfermeras: ensayo piloto ENHANCE
The overall aim of the proposed study is to determine the feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and preliminary effectiveness of the adapted nurse-led, community-based rehabilitation treatment model for community-dwelling individuals living with psychosis in Blantyre, Malawi using a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Psychosis exacts a heavy morbidity and mortality toll worldwide, but especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Psychotic disorders are one of the most common presenting complaints for individuals admitted to specialty mental health services in many LMICs. Psychotic disorders typically have onset in early adulthood and a chronic course, meaning patients suffer from many years of poor functionality, disability, and lost productivity. Indeed, psychotic disorders remain among the 15 leading causes of disability globally. The chronicity and severity of psychotic disorders exert a heavy burden on family as relatives frequently have to assume caregiver roles in LMIC where access to formal mental health care is limited.
Despite the significant toll of psychosis in LMICs, treatment options are extremely limited and focus heavily on acute, time-limited inpatient stabilization. This focus fails to consider the demonstrated need for long-term post-acute outpatient treatment and community-based rehabilitation to improve outcomes and prevent relapse. Contextual community factors such as reliable continued access to mental health care, stigma and its negative impact on medication adherence, inadequate support, and family conflict are key risk factors for subsequent relapse upon discharge into the community. Research has recommended the need for community interventions to minimize medication non-adherence and limit relapse and readmission.
Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) directly addresses the need for a concerted approach to post-acute community-based care for people with psychosis in low-resource settings. CBR is a general evidence-based approach for the long-term treatment and support of individuals with a broad range of disabilities in resource-constrained settings that is particularly well suited to address the needs of those with psychosis. CBR aims to improve the quality of life of individuals living with disability by supporting medical care engagement, addressing functional goals, and encouraging social inclusion within their families and communities. CBR is amenable to delivery by a range of personnel and involves collaboration between caregivers, community members, and available public sector services to facilitate the rehabilitation of patients.
Accordingly, in this protocol the investigators will pilot-test an adaptation of the evidence-based Community-Based Rehabilitation (CBR) treatment model specifically to address the needs of community-dwelling individuals with psychosis in Malawi. Specifically, investigators will complete a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and preliminary effectiveness of the adapted CBR treatment model. This work will provide a critical advance in establishing the evidence base for community-based treatment models for people living with psychosis outside of the context of acute inpatient stabilization so as to enhance rehabilitation, functioning, and quality of life.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Blantyre, Malaui
- Queen Elizabeth Central Hosptial
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria for PWLE:
- Current outpatient at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital psychiatry clinic
- Age 18 or older
- Diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder or clinical presentation of symptoms of hallucinations, delusions or thought disorder that persisted for longer than one month and are accompanied by significant functional impairment
- Resident in Blantyre District
- Not planning to relocate out of Blantyre District in next 12 months
- Has a primary caregiver willing to participate in the study
- Has current elevated symptoms or poor functioning as demonstrated by one or more of:
Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale score ≥58
WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 score ≥35
Clinical Global Impression Severity score ≥2 (at least mildly ill)
Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers:
- Is a current caregiver for an eligible and consenting patient participant.
- Age 18 or older
- Resident in Blantyre District
- Not planning to relocate out of Blantyre District in next 12 months
Exclusion Criteria for PWLE:
- Not a current outpatient at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital psychiatry clinic
- Not Age 18 or older
- No diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder or clinical presentation of symptoms of hallucinations, delusions or thought disorder that persisted for longer than one month and are accompanied by significant functional impairment
- Not a resident in Blantyre District
- Planning to relocate out of Blantyre District in next 12 months
- Does not have a primary caregiver willing to participate in the study
- Does not have current elevated symptoms or poor functioning as demonstrated by one or more of:
Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale score ≥58
WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 score ≥35
Clinical Global Impression Severity score ≥2 (at least mildly ill)
Exclusion Criteria for Caregivers:
- Is not a current caregiver for an eligible and consenting patient participant.
- Not Age 18 or older
- Not a resident in Blantyre District
- Planning to relocate out of Blantyre District in next 12 months
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Adapted ENHANCE Intervention
Nurse-delivered community-based treatment model for people living with psychosis in the community, coordinated with the usual outpatient care |
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive community-based rehabilitation (CBR) delivered by the Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH) clinical team of psychiatric nurses. The ENHANCE CBR intervention will consist of nurse-delivered home visits over approximately a 12-month period with decreasing intensity, with approximately weekly visits for an initial phase of 2-4 months; biweekly visits for an intermediate phase of 4-6 months; and monthly for a final transition phase of 3-4 months. The exact schedule and duration of each phase will be individualized by the nurse to the participant based on the participant's initial presentation and their response during the intervention. The intervention team will deliver intervention content with the participant and/or family members and caregivers as appropriate to the module. |
|
Comparador activo: Enhanced usual care
Continue with usual outpatient care, enhanced with additional feedback and clinical recommendations to the outpatient treatment team |
Participants randomized to usual care will continue to receive their standard clinical care at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH) as previously. The clinical team will be provided a summary of the results of the eligibility assessment, specifically an interpretation of the scores on the symptomatology and disability scales with any relevant clinical recommendations. These individuals will receive no home-based services. |
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Approached to Meet Enrollment (Recruitment Feasibility)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline
|
This measure is the ability to successfully enroll people with lived experience (PWLE) in the pilot intervention. Feasibility will be evaluated by measuring the number of participants approached in order to accrue the final sample. |
Baseline
|
|
Proportion of Participants Retained in the Study (Retention Feasibility)
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
Feasibility will be evaluated by measuring the proportion of participants retained in the study (participants enrolled at baseline who are still enrolled in the trial through 12 months). |
12 months
|
|
Number of Participants Who Found the Intervention Helpful (Intervention Acceptability)
Periodo de tiempo: Conclusion of study, Month 12
|
A subset of intervention participants were asked if they were willing to participate in a qualitative interview. The 12 who agreed to participant were asked a series of qualitative questions including whether or not the intervention was helpful or unhelpful as a measure of satisfaction to inform intervention acceptability. The number indicating "helpful" as their response are reported. |
Conclusion of study, Month 12
|
|
Number of Intervention Participants Who Completed All Intervention Phases (Intervention Attendance Fidelity)
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
The total number of participants who completed all three intervention phases, out of the number of all intervention participants. This outcome does not apply to Enhanced Usual Care and no data were collected. |
12 months
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Functioning
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
Level of functioning will be evaluated using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0 12-item version). The WHODAS 2.0 measures general disability related to multiple domains (i.e., understanding and communicating, getting around, self care, getting along with people, life activities, work/school, participation in society). Total scores on each item range from 1 (no disability) to 5 (extreme/cannot do), with higher scores indicating more impairment. Total scores on the scale range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating more impairment. |
12 months
|
|
Quality of Life Based on Short-Form 8 Measure
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
Quality of life will be evaluated using the Short Form-8 (SF-8). The SF-8 is a shorter, 8-item questionnaire that covers the same eight domains as the full SF-36. The 8 items are scored using normed scoring that ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of better quality of life. |
12 months
|
|
Change in PANSS Total Score From Baseline
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline,12 months
|
Change in psychosis symptoms from baseline were evaluated using the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale total scores (PANSS). Total scores range from 30 to 210 and include the total sum of all three sub-scales, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Scores reported are the change in symptoms relative to baseline. |
Baseline,12 months
|
|
Psychosis Symptom Response
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
Psychosis symptom response will be defined as the number of participants with a ≥20% reduction in symptoms from baseline as measured using the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) total score. Total scores range from 30 to 210 and include a sum of all three sub-scales, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. |
12 months
|
|
Psychosis Symptom Remission
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
Psychosis symptom remission was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS). Each PANSS item was scored on a scale from 1 to 7 with 1 = "absent" and and 7 = "extreme" with higher values indicating worse symptoms. Remission was defined as the number of participants who responded as having absent or minimal symptoms on items G5, G9, N1, N4, N6, and P1-3 in the PANSS. |
12 months
|
|
Clinical Improvement
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
Clinical improvement will be evaluated using the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score (CGI-I). Clinical improvement will be measured as the number of participants with a score of 1 ("very much improved") or 2 ("much improved"). The CGI-I is a 1-7 scale, designed to evaluate improvement through a comparison with the initial assessment of the patient at baseline. Possible ratings range from "very much improved" (score of 1) to "very much worse" (score of 7). |
12 months
|
|
Internalized Stigma
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
Internalized stigma will be evaluated using the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Inventory (ISMI). A total score is calculated by taking a sum of the responses on the items (range=10 to 40). Higher total scores indicate greater internalized stigma. |
12 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Brian Pence, PhD, MPH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 23-1665
- R34MH131234 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC).
Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD
9 to 36 months following publication
Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD
The investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an IRB, IEC, or REB, as applicable, and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .