Un estudio aleatorizado que compara tres dosis de fentanilo nebulizado en adultos mayores
A Randomized Study Comparing of Three Doses Nebulized Fentanyl in Older Adults With Severe Musculoskeletal Pain at the Emergency Department
This clinical trial compares three different nebulized fentanyl dosages for older persons experiencing severe musculoskeletal pain at the emergency department.
The main objective is:
Does the effectiveness of nebulized fentanyl at dosages of 2 mcg/kg, 3 mcg/kg, and 4 mcg/kg at 30 minutes differ in older patients who report to the emergency room with pain from musculoskeletal injuries?
Secondary outcome are:
- Incidence of adverse effects after drug administration at minutes 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120
- Incidence of receiving other pain relief treatments (rescue therapy) in minutes 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 Participants will receive an explanation of the study and possible side effects, which may take approximately 5-10 minutes, without affecting the primary treatment of the patients. Consent will be obtained in this study, along with signing or fingerprinting as evidence in the consent form.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Participants will receive nebulized fentanyl for pain reduction at the pre-determined randomized dose, then researchers will follow up assessments of pain levels, vital signs, and any side effects at various intervals.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- Fase 3
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Bangkok
-
Bangkok, Bangkok, Tailandia, 10300
- Faculty of Medicine,Vajira Hospital
-
Bangkok, Bangkok, Tailandia, 10300
- Jiraporn Sri-on
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age more than or equal 65 years old.
- Presented with musculoskeletal pain within 3 days.
- Pain score on verbal numeric rating scale ≥ 5.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients need immediate intervention.
- Patients need acute rescue for acute coronary syndrome, respiratory failure, and stroke.
- Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min, Cirrhosis stage III, IV (present with ascites and varices).
- Trauma >2 organ.
- Comorbidities of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Take MAO inhibitors within 14 days.
- History of opioid used within 8 hours.
- History of alcohol or drug abuse.
- History of fentanyl allergy.
- Patients with difficulty to communication (e.g. altered mental status, severe dementia (define by 6-items cognitive screening > 12, language barrier).
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Doble
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador activo: Nebulized fentanyl 2 mcg/kg
The researcher prepared fentanyl (the researcher informed the in-charge nurse to open the medicine cabinet and double-checked the dosage with the in-charge nurse). The dosage was 2 micrograms per kilogram of body weight (calculated based on the patient's actual weight in kilograms). The medication was contained in a nebulizer. It was then mixed with normal saline (0.9% normal saline) to a total volume of 5 milliliters and administered via nebulization. |
After the enrollment process, the main research assistant will take a brown envelope containing the randomization and hand it to the principal investigator in numerical order. The principal investigator will then open the envelope to determine the group assignment for the patient, revealing which fentanyl nebulization dosage group (2 mcg/kg, 3 mcg/kg and 4 mcg/kg) the patient will be placed in. In this study, participants will be divided into three groups as previously described. We evaluate pain score at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 minutes after receiving nebulized fentanyl by a train research assistance who is blind from the treatment dosage.
Otros nombres:
|
|
Comparador activo: Nebulized fentanyl 3 mcg/kg
The researcher prepared fentanyl (the researcher informed the in-charge nurse to open the medicine cabinet and double-checked the dosage with the in-charge nurse). The dosage was 3 micrograms per kilogram of body weight (calculated based on the patient's actual weight in kilograms). The medication was contained in a nebulizer. It was then mixed with normal saline (0.9% normal saline) to a total volume of 5 milliliters and administered via nebulization. |
After the enrollment process, the main research assistant will take a brown envelope containing the randomization and hand it to the principal investigator in numerical order. The principal investigator will then open the envelope to determine the group assignment for the patient, revealing which fentanyl nebulization dosage group (2 mcg/kg, 3 mcg/kg and 4 mcg/kg) the patient will be placed in. In this study, participants will be divided into three groups as previously described. We evaluate pain score at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 minutes after receiving nebulized fentanyl by a train research assistance who is blind from the treatment dosage.
Otros nombres:
|
|
Comparador activo: Nebulized fentanyl 4 mcg/kg
The researcher prepared fentanyl (the researcher informed the in-charge nurse to open the medicine cabinet and double-checked the dosage with the in-charge nurse). The dosage was 4 micrograms per kilogram of body weight (calculated based on the patient's actual weight in kilograms). The medication was contained in a nebulizer. It was then mixed with normal saline (0.9% normal saline) to a total volume of 5 milliliters and administered via nebulization. |
After the enrollment process, the main research assistant will take a brown envelope containing the randomization and hand it to the principal investigator in numerical order. The principal investigator will then open the envelope to determine the group assignment for the patient, revealing which fentanyl nebulization dosage group (2 mcg/kg, 3 mcg/kg and 4 mcg/kg) the patient will be placed in. In this study, participants will be divided into three groups as previously described. We evaluate pain score at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105 and 120 minutes after receiving nebulized fentanyl by a train research assistance who is blind from the treatment dosage.
Otros nombres:
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Efficacy in pain reduction following nebulized fentanyl administration at different dosages.
Periodo de tiempo: 30 Minutes
|
Efficacy in pain reduction following nebulized fentanyl administration at dosages of 2 mcg/kg, 3 mcg/kg, and 4 mcg/kg in elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with musculoskeletal pain, using verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) VNRS score ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating more severe pain. Ten indicates the worst pain, and zero indicates no pain. |
30 Minutes
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse events following nebulized fentanyl administration at different dosages.
Periodo de tiempo: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 Minutes
|
Adverse events following nebulized fentanyl administration at dosages of 2 mcg/kg, 3 mcg/kg, and 4 mcg/kg in elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with with musculoskeletal pain |
0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 Minutes
|
|
Events of rescue therapy following nebulized fentanyl administration at different dosages.
Periodo de tiempo: 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 Minutes
|
Events of rescue therapy following nebulized fentanyl administration at dosages of 2 mcg/kg, 3 mcg/kg, and 4 mcg/kg in elderly patients presenting to the emergency department with musculoskeletal pain |
30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120 Minutes
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Supavit Punyapatipan, M.D., Faculty of medicine, Vajira hospital
- Investigador principal: Jiraporn Sri-on, M.D., Faculty of medicine, Vajira hospital
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Moriarty O, McGuire BE, Finn DP. The effect of pain on cognitive function: a review of clinical and preclinical research. Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Mar;93(3):385-404. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
- Herr KA, Garand L. Assessment and measurement of pain in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2001 Aug;17(3):457-78, vi. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0690(05)70080-x.
- Vlaeyen JWS, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain. 2000 Apr;85(3):317-332. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00242-0.
- By the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria(R) Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria(R) for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2052-2081. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18372. Epub 2023 May 4.
- Chang HY, Daubresse M, Kruszewski SP, Alexander GC. Prevalence and treatment of pain in EDs in the United States, 2000 to 2010. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 May;32(5):421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
- Chakour MC, Gibson SJ, Bradbeer M, Helme RD. The effect of age on A delta- and C-fibre thermal pain perception. Pain. 1996 Jan;64(1):143-152. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00102-6.
- Pergolizzi J, Boger RH, Budd K, Dahan A, Erdine S, Hans G, Kress HG, Langford R, Likar R, Raffa RB, Sacerdote P. Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone). Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
- Teasell R, Dittmer DK. Complications of immobilization and bed rest. Part 2: Other complications. Can Fam Physician. 1993 Jun;39:1440-2, 1445-6.
- Tongbua S, Sri-On J, Thong-On K, Paksophis T. Non-inferiority of intranasal ketamine compared to intravenous morphine for musculoskeletal pain relief among older adults in an emergency department: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2022 Mar 1;51(3):afac073. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac073.
- Labroo RB, Paine MF, Thummel KE, Kharasch ED. Fentanyl metabolism by human hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P450 3A4: implications for interindividual variability in disposition, efficacy, and drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos. 1997 Sep;25(9):1072-80.
- Grape S, Schug SA, Lauer S, Schug BS. Formulations of fentanyl for the management of pain. Drugs. 2010;70(1):57-72. doi: 10.2165/11531740-000000000-00000.
- Rosenblum A, Marsch LA, Joseph H, Portenoy RK. Opioids and the treatment of chronic pain: controversies, current status, and future directions. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Oct;16(5):405-16. doi: 10.1037/a0013628.
- Farahmand S, Shiralizadeh S, Talebian MT, Bagheri-Hariri S, Arbab M, Basirghafouri H, Saeedi M, Sedaghat M, Mirzababai H. Nebulized fentanyl vs intravenous morphine for ED patients with acute limb pain: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):1011-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.051. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
- Sabri A, Szalas J, Holmes KS, Labib L, Mussivand T. Failed attempts and improvement strategies in peripheral intravenous catheterization. Biomed Mater Eng. 2013;23(1-2):93-108. doi: 10.3233/BME-120735.
- Yalcinli S, Akarca FK, Can O, Sener A, Akbinar C. Factors affecting the first-attempt success rate of intravenous cannulation in older people. J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jun;28(11-12):2206-2213. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14816. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
- Puntillo F, Giglio M, Varrassi G. The Routes of Administration for Acute Postoperative Pain Medication. Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):909-925. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00286-5. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
- Thompson JP, Thompson DF. Nebulized Fentanyl in Acute Pain: A Systematic Review. Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Oct;50(10):882-91. doi: 10.1177/1060028016659077. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
- Hess DR. Nebulizers: principles and performance. Respir Care. 2000 Jun;45(6):609-22.
- Bartfield JM, Flint RD, McErlean M, Broderick J. Nebulized fentanyl for relief of abdominal pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Mar;10(3):215-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01993.x.
- Miner JR, Kletti C, Herold M, Hubbard D, Biros MH. Randomized clinical trial of nebulized fentanyl citrate versus i.v. fentanyl citrate in children presenting to the emergency department with acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):895-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.036.
- Singh AP, Jena SS, Meena RK, Tewari M, Rastogi V. Nebulised fentanyl for post-operative pain relief, a prospective double-blind controlled randomised clinical trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;57(6):583-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.123331.
- Li L, Liu X, Herr K. Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults. Pain Med. 2007 Apr;8(3):223-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00296.x.
- Singh V, Gillespie TW, Lane O, Spektor B, Zarrabi AJ, Egan K, Curseen K, Tsvetkova M, Beumer JH, Sniecinski R, Shteamer JW, Switchenko J, Harvey RD. A dose-escalation clinical trial of intranasal ketamine for uncontrolled cancer-related pain. Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Apr;42(4):298-310. doi: 10.1002/phar.2669. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
- Imai K, Morita T, Yokomichi N, Mori M, Naito AS, Yamauchi T, Tsukuura H, Uneno Y, Tsuneto S, Inoue S. Association of the RASS Score with Intensity of Symptoms, Discomfort, and Communication Capacity in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients Receiving Palliative Sedation: Is RASS an Appropriate Outcome Measure? Palliat Med Rep. 2022 Apr 8;3(1):47-54. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2021.0087. eCollection 2022.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 219/66 FB
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .