Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

The TRAIN Study: A Concussion Prevention Strategy in Middle Schools

30 novembre 2021 mis à jour par: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Popular Opinion Leaders as a Sports Concussion Prevention Strategy in Middle Schools-The TRAIN Study, a Randomized Control Study

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a theory-driven intervention (TRAIN concussion education) to improve parental concussion-related attitudes, beliefs, intentions, confidence in knowledge, and self-efficacy.

Participants: 180 parents of United States middle school aged children whose children have been engaged in organized sports within the past 2 years.

Procedures: The study is a single-blind (participants) randomized control trial. The investigators will randomize eligible parents into two groups: (1) control (standard concussion education); and treatment (standard concussion education AND TRAIN concussion education) to evaluate the effectiveness of the TRAIN concussion education intervention.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

A convenience sample of participants will be recruited from parents of United States middle school aged children whose children have been engaged in organized sports within the past 2 years. Interested parents will contact study stuff, who will ensure eligibility criteria are met.

Upon this, and completing the written informed consent process, participants will be assigned a unique identifier and randomized (simple) without replacement to one of the two study arms (control vs. treatment), using a predetermined random number generator in Excel.

Participants in the control group will receive standard concussion education materials focused on concussion prevention in youth sport. Participants in the treatment group will receive the same standard concussion education materials AND the TRAIN concussion education module. The TRAIN education module is grounded in a theoretical structure inclusive of the original intervention tenants of the Popular Opinion Leader (POL) and Diffusion of Innovations frameworks, and within the context of the socioecological model.

Participants will complete a self-administered online pre-test survey, which includes assessments of concussion-related attitudes, beliefs, intentions, confidence in knowledge, and self-efficacy. After completion of the pre-test survey, participants will complete their assigned intervention (TRAIN concussion education module + standard concussion education materials versus standard concussion education materials only).

Upon completion of their assigned intervention, participants will complete the online survey again to obtain post-test measures (post-test survey). Participants will also be scheduled to complete individual semi-structured interviews.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

103

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, États-Unis, 27514
        • University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult with a child/children enrolled in a United States middle school
  • Adult whose child has participated in organized sports in the past 2 years

Exclusion Criteria:

• Adult without a child/children enrolled in a United States middle school

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Standard Concussion Education
Participants will receive standard concussion education materials (online training) focused on concussion prevention in youth sport.
Participants will receive a standard concussion education module.
Expérimental: TRAIN Concussion Education
After receiving the standard concussion education materials (online training), participants will receive an additional module, the TRAIN concussion education module.
Participants will receive the TRAIN concussion education module.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Concussion-Related Beliefs Change Score
Délai: Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Participants are asked 6 questions concerning beliefs related to concussion risk, symptoms, and management. These items are added together to compute an overall score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 6 to a maximum 24, where a higher score indicated more favorable beliefs. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Concussion-Related Attitudes Change Score
Délai: Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Participants are asked 20 survey items identifying an individual's attitudes about a certain behavior (e.g., seeking care). Each item is added together to compute an overall attitude score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 20 to a maximum of 140, where higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Confidence in Concussion-Related Knowledge Change Score
Délai: Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Participants are asked 2 questions concerning confidence in knowing and recognizing concussion symptoms. These items are added together to compute an overall score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 2 to a maximum 8, where a higher score indicated better confidence in concussion knowledge. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Concussion-Related Intentions Change Score
Délai: Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Participants are asked 4 questions assessing intention to engage in or talk with others about concussion prevention. The items are totaled to compute an overall behavioral intention score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 4 to a maximum of 16, where a higher score indicates a better likelihood to engage in favorable behaviors related to concussion prevention. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Concussion-Related Self-Efficacy Change Score
Délai: Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)
Participants are asked 8 questions assessing their self-efficacy regarding engaging in or talking with others about concussion prevention. The items are totaled to compute an overall self-efficacy score. Scoring scale ranges from a minimum of 8 to a maximum of 32, where a higher score indicates higher self-efficacy. A change score will be computed post score-pre score.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post intervention approximately 7-30 days after intervention completion)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Zachary Kerr, PhD, MPH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

17 mai 2021

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

15 octobre 2021

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

30 octobre 2021

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

7 avril 2021

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

7 avril 2021

Première publication (Réel)

12 avril 2021

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

15 décembre 2021

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 novembre 2021

Dernière vérification

1 novembre 2021

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Délai de partage IPD

9 - 36 months following publication

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Commotion cérébrale, cerveau

Essais cliniques sur Standard Concussion Education

3
S'abonner